I am on the lookout for free dynamic DNS for top level domain name.There seem to be quite a few free dynamic DNS providers for third level domain but I am having trouble finding one for top level domain. I am almost on the verge of actually mapping the top level domain to a CNAME of a third level domain with dynamic DNS but I really don't want to do that.
View 3 RepliesI am on the lookout for free dynamic DNS for top level domain name such as example.com
There seem to be quite a few free dynamic DNS providers for third level domain but I am having trouble finding one for top level domain. I am almost on the verge of actually mapping the top level domain to a CNAME of a third level domain with dynamic DNS but I really don't want to do that.
What's the best free dynamic DNS provider?
I found a ton of them on the internet but I'm not sure which ones are safe.I'm trying to use my home NAS as an ftp server that can be accessed remotely.
I am using several SG300-28 Switches with firmware version 1.1.2.0.I have dynamic VLAN enabled. As RADIUS server I am using free radius 2.1.12.Authentication is only based on the MAC address. (I configured that on the switches)On the switches I created three VLANs. VLAN100 for the authenticated clients, VLAN200 for Management interface and VLAN300 as Guest VLAN. After a wrong authentication the clients should be put into this Guest VLAN immediately (I configured this on the switches). I am using Windows XP and Windows 7 clients in my network. I did not configure any EAP settings because I just wnat to use the MAC address.
In most cases the dynamic VLAN assignment and authentication is working fine. The switch log says that the client is authenticated and the same I can see on free radius log. But in some (rare) cases the client is rejected. The CISCO log says "MAC aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff was rejected on port ge17" but when I look at the free radius log then this MAC address was successfully authorized.
The problem is that the client gets an IP address based on the Guest VLAN300 but after that the switch seems to "switch" the VLAN on the port and then the client is authenticated correctly on the right VLAN but the client does not request a new IP on the new VLAN. If I unplug and re-plug the LAN cable in most cases the client get the correct VLAN and the correct IP. This is happening randomly on nearly all my PCs.
Do I have to set some timers higher ? I don't think it is a problem between switch and RADIUS but a problem between communication of the host and the switch.
what ios for 827-4v from 12.4 can i use for IPSEC+ddns?i tested some from 12.4 but normally working only 12.3(26)GD, but i want ddns feature? some from 12.4 is working with tracebacks, other is not loading - with error (loadprog: error - program section linked to illegal address)
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs there any easy way to tell what networking level my laptop is capable of? Its an older IBM, T30.Wireless works fine but I'm thinking of upgrading the router and want to make sure the laptop will connect using the faster N network speed.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have a 7206VXR with an NPE-G1 processor. We're running the standard stuff on it, but here are the highlights.We just enabled netflow on it to send the data to an external source for analysis and the overall CPU level increased, but not significantly. About what should we expect for the overall CPU level? At this point, it's averaging close to 40% during peak hours.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5505 that has two inside security level 100 interfaces and an outside interface.On the inside interface we have corporate domain subnet with DC and 30 hosts. On the inside2 interface I have few servers that runs specific application important for our business needs, and dumb terminals that are connected to them.I have a laptop user that periodically needs access from our corporate vlan1 to one of the servers on inside 2 vlan via remote desktop or some other remote viewer client,so he can view reports etc.I have enabled same-security-traffic intra-interface command and added nat exempt command pointing specific laptop host machine to that specific server.
Now my main concern is regarding security. This user carries his laptop home, browses the web, puts USB memory, and you can imagine how this machine is susceptible to all kind of malicious software. Inside2 vlan is very important and until now it has been a very secure environment.This is no longer the case since all traffic between this inside sec level 100 vlan host and corresponding inside2 sec level 100 server is now allowed because of the enabled same level interface traffic and nat exemption rule. Do I have another solution that would allow communication based on just a tcp port number for this host? Something like port forwarding from outside to inside Vlan interface?
We have wireless in the house, the router, etc is down in the basement where my office is. Is there any way to increase the strength to the main level of the house? Our house is standard size, but it seems to weaken upstairs.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5520 8.2(5) with ACS 5.1, I made the configutation of Authentication and is working well, now how I can configure the authorization and get into the privileged level 15 mode directly.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have cisco ACS 5.2 and external identity source as RSA secure ID.Currently when the RSA user login to AAA Network devices, User id & passcode prompt coming after giving the credential its going to user exec mode.Then after "enable" command again asking for Passcode giving passcode then user able to logged in successfully.
I need RSA users to get direct privlege level15 (privlege mode) ? no need to ask enable password ?
I checked this for local ACS users it is working and loca users getting directly privelege mode access...
I have 2 dmz interfaces(dmz1 and dmz2) with security level 50. I am able to ping the hosts on dmz2 from dmz1. I am running a service on a dmz2 host on port 82 but i am not able to access that service from dmz1. Also, i have an inside interface at security lever 99 which is able to access that service.
Also, i have defined the following command to allow same security level communication.
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
We have more than 50 devices handling by PI 1.2 (testing) I like to know how to do configuration archiving with user who doesn't have write privilege.
I tried like this.
username john privilege 6 password cisco privilege exec level 6 show running-config
(result) show run --> blank
I tried this user with one of switch in PI 1.2. It did not do configuration backup
username inout password inout username inout privilege 15 autocommand show running-config
(result) once logged in, it automatically showed running-config. However when I tried with PI 1.2 with this user (inout). I couldn't do configuration back.
reference [URL]
create certain user with read-only privilege while PI 1.2 is able to do configuration archiving ?
On a Cisco ASA 5520. I have 2 interfaces that are the same security level. I need hosts on 1 of these interfaces to be able to get to a specific IP and port on the other but I DON'T want to blanket enable 'same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" I have added an ACL inbound on the interface allowing the desired traffic and inbound on the other for return traffic and it simply doesn't work.
interface GigabitEthernet0/3.175
vlan 175
nameif Test175
security-level 30
ip address 172.30.175.1 255.255.255.0
[code]....
We have an ASA5520 firewall, IOS 8.0(4), running in routed mode with an operational Cisco 2821 router to ASA-5520 L2L IPsec VPN.:All Internet searches explain how to enable a L2L IPsec VPN from the LOWER security-level interface to a HIGHER security-level interface- and this is how our setup is configured and it is operational and working fine.:We now have a need to setup another L2L IPsec VPN tunnel on the same firewall BUT this time traffic will be arriving on the HIGHER security-level interface destination is to a LOWER security-level interface.:Is it possible to enable a L2L IPsec VPN tunnel between a HIGHER security-level interface to a LOWER security-level interface?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have issue with traffic passing between same security level interfaces. I want to control traffic between same security level interfaces with ACL. Even no restriction, traffic does not go through. [code]
I tried to access server from THREE network to web server at FOUR network I have no response. In sh xlate output it shows "PAT Global 10.124.104.254 (28889) Local 10.124.103.1(2922) " I am not sure what else should I do. I add both same-security-level commands and it is the same.
Quote from the RV180 manual; 'By default, all access from the insecure WAN side is blocked from accessing the secure LAN, except in response to requests from the LAN or DMZ.'
Does this mean a general access-rule for the firewall blocking all inbound (WAN --> LAN) data is not required?
In the bottom screenshot how to determine the coverage level, I couldn't find any explicit documentation on that .
View 3 Replies View RelatedIn official information for SG300-28p noise level is 40.6 dB, but in fact its too noisy. Is it possible to change speed of fans? I use only 8 PoE ports.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are using WiSM WLCs and WCS to control a variety of 1131,1142 and 1252 APs utilising AP groups.
I've noticed on WCS that the power of certain APs is at a low setting, even though the APs surrounding them are also at a low setting. This is causing some gaps to appear on the heatmaps. I was under the impression that the WLCs would regulate the AP power to compensate for any gaps. Currently the global TX power level assignment method algorithm is set to automatic every 600 sec.
Now, obviously I could change this to fixed (not ideal as I may not want all my APs to run at max power all the time) or to on demand (also not ideal due to the increased admin).
Is there a way I can verify that the automatic power levels are adjusting as they should? Why are there gaps appearing in my heatmaps?
*NB It's not just the gaps on the heatmaps, I'm getting reports of dropping wireless signals from users hence me looking at the heatmaps and they just happen to correspond.
WLC version 6.0.199.4
WCS version 7.0.172.0
if there is a MIB available for the EHWIC-4G-LTE-V card that would allow me to monitor the current RSSI level?
If I issue the command "show cell 0/1/0 radio" on my Cisco2911 router, I get the following info. I'd like to monitor the "Current RSSI" level in Solarwinds.
Router>show cell 0/1/0 radio
Radio power mode = ON
Current RSSI = -67 dBm
LTE Technology Preference = AUTO
LTE Technology Selected = LTE
I'm trying to implement some best practices for ASA running on Software Release 8.2 and had a question about the default security-level behavior. Let's say I have 3 interfaces...
-inside (security-level 100)
-dmz (security-level 50)
-outside (security-level 0)
I have an ACL on the inside interface allowing http access to anywhere. Because of the ACL, the implicit higher to lower security level access is nullified. Correct?
I do NOT have any ACL on the dmz interface applied. So, would the servers in the dmz be allowed outbound access to the Internet due to the default higher to lower security level behavior?
I have a Cisco3800 with IOS Version 12.3(14)T2 and I have an HWIC-1GE-SFP module inserted on it.
I need to know if there is a command to verify optical power level in this module inserted in the Cisco 3800 router?
Something similar to the following command that I can execute in an Cisco ASR9K:
show controllers Te0/0/0/1 phy | i Rx
I have a 6509E switch with dual 6Kw power supply that is logging "Power supply 1 input has changed. Power capacity adjusted to 2671.20W" then will bounce back to normal at random times from 1sec to 10sec. Is there a command to check what each input level of the power supply to try to identify possibly which source is causing the problem? The power supply input lights remains green while this is occuring.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI can't seem to enable in ASA with a non-15 privilege level user configured in ACS 4.2 (tacacs).When I enable in IOS device, it enables and "show privilege" shows level 10 as expected. ACS should be configured correctly as it works fine with IOS. User is not set with explicit settings. Group is set with "max enable level" 15 and "shell exec priv level" 15. The enable password is set to the internal ACS PAP password. Works fine in IOS.When I enable in ASA, it fails to enable, and ACS log says "Tacacs+ enable privilege too low". I suspect that ASA tries to enable into level 15 explicitely. If I try to issue "enable 10" command in ASA it says: Enabling to privilege levels is not allowed when configured for AAA authentication. Use 'enable' only. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have an ADSM (version 5.2(3) ) . In ASA ( version 7.2(3)) we are working with routing, access restriction and configuring IPSEC vpn with integration to our AD. We need to get two diferent profiles: one for networking administrators, who are going to manage routing, acls and have the root for ASA, and the other profile is going to be for the vpn administrators. As I read from the ASDM 6.0 user guide is posible define command privilege level. So do you consider posible to define a particular level for all the command related with ipsec vpn (Create, Modify and Delete) and asociate that particular level with the user for vpn administration.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhether ISE-3315-K9 with ise version: Service Engine: 1.0.4.573 , supports the command level accounting
Bascially , we have integrated Cisco Switches with Cisco ISE for Device Authentication using Radius , we are able get the authentication logs on to the devices , but for any command changes or update done on Cisco devices we are not able to get the command accounting.
I have a customer with a 861 ISR.I want to block all the privilege 0 users from access the enable command
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=0, enable does not work
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=15, enable does work
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=0, enable does not work
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=15, enable does not work
I have issued the command:privilege exec level 15 enable Should block everyone except 15's from accessing the enable command SSH and TELNET are on the same vty:
line con 0
login authentication local_authen
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 3
[code]....
Basically TELNET is following the rules ( priv=0 not allowed to access enable ) but SSH is not following the rules ( both priv=15 and priv=0 cannot access the command ) is there a way from blocking somes users from login in completely?
I am running PI1.2 virtual appliance (on ESXi 5.0). i had some issues and open a ticket to TAC. the TAC engineer requested me to send him the below:
/opt/CSCOlumos/logs/failed_inventory_feature.log
/opt/CSCOlumos/logs/ifm_inventory.log
.
.
My question is how do we get to the shell of PI1.2? i know we can get to the shell of LMS4.2. do we have access to shell of PI1.2 virtual appliance?
I'm facing a problem with two vlans. Each vlan has internet access by NAT.
In each vlan there is at least one server, who should be accessible from the other vlan and vice versa.
The function "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" doesn't work, because NAT control is in place - so an expert.
Some experts told me it's not possible to route back out the same interface, and also not route back out the seperate subinterfaces as well.
I have two 3750x in a stack running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.bin with License Level: ipservices?I am planning to upgrade to c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin will this keep my ipservices licence or revert back to IPbase
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm setting up a large rambler house with a large footprint, and the only broadband connections are at opposing points of the house. Right now, I'm using two Linksys WRT54GS routers running Tomato in a WDS setup. A router, positioned in the middle point of the house, acts as a wireless access point so that the computer on the far end of the house can pickup the wireless signal. (One WRT54GS on its own doesn't have the power to go all the way across the house.)
I would like simplify things with a single, hi-power, hi-speed router at one end of the house. I know I can get better speeds with Draft N routers, but I need more signal strength as well. Are there any products currently available that can perform much better than my WRT54GS routers right now?
I need to go about 125 feet, through a number of walls.
currenly running a C6509E, with a WS-SUP720-3B running IOS level S72033-adventerprisek9_wan-MZ.122-22.SXH3. I want to install a WS-X6748-GE-TX blade and would like NOT to have to upgrade IOS at this time. Future migrations are planned. Can this be done?
View 6 Replies View Related