One Site Not Accessible?

Mar 9, 2012

Ok so one site i used to use regularly has for the last few month been either incredibly slow or totally inaccessible. Its a perfectly sedate site just a social forum, its this one. www.pandemoniumcarnival.com/ which is accessible to all my friends but seemingly not to me...So far i have changed DNS (to open DNS and Google, thinking my isp had blocked it for some reason)Tried Firefox (my usual browser) chrome, IE ...flushed all the settings etc in each no cookies etc. Tried "In Private Browsing" etcOddly i can get to the site if i use a site called "Hide my ***" a proxy server thing. But even then its not fully functioning due i think to the proxy setting (?)

View 8 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco VPN :: 5510 Site To Site VPN Access To Servers With Overlapped Remote Site

May 18, 2012

I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only  My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5520 Requirement To Terminate Site-to-site VPN From Remote Site

Jun 17, 2012

We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 877 / How To IPsec Site To Site Vpn Port Forwarding To Remote Site

Jun 13, 2012

The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
 
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.  
 
Building configuration... 
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5505 - Site To Site Connected But Cannot Ping Remote Site

Oct 11, 2011

cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510.  I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 / Site To Site Vpn With One Site Always Initiate A Tunnel?

Feb 7, 2011

I have ASA 5505, i configured site to site vpn between central site and remote site and is working. Now the problem is we use remote site for troubleshooting purpose, so we need to create a tunnel from remote site to central site. I need to configure such a way that remote site can craete a tunnel to central site, but central site not able to create a tunnel, it just respond to remote site.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 Site To Site Connection / Remote Site?

Mar 6, 2011

i have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Site To Site With Dynamic IP In One Site

Jan 27, 2012

i want configure VPN between backoffice which have ASA5510 firewall with static IP and site which have cisco router 1861 with dynamic IP.
 
how i can configure the site to site between them?

View 2 Replies View Related

WAN Miniport (IP) - My Lan Systems Are Not Accessible?

Feb 22, 2011

i found WAN Miniport (IP) - in my windows xp and at the same time my Lan systems are not accessible.

View 1 Replies View Related

Computer Not Accessible From Server By Name?

Mar 19, 2011

I'm working on a small network (1 server, 6 workstations, stand-alone, not connected to the main Company Network) "reinstalling" a Workstation. Re-imaging from semi-generic Norton Ghost image (4 of the 6 Workstations run the same programs with different addresses). I then had to reset the IP, the Computer Name, and then the Domain (I did it in that order).

I'm using Windows Server 2003 as the domain controller, and the Workstation is Xp Pro Sp 2.

The Workstation is using the same IP, Name, User as before, and they were working with the server previously (a program had corrupted prompting the reinstall).

The problem is that if I open windows explorer and type in the Workstations IP (\000.00.0.1) I get access to the computer. But if I go there and type in the Workstations Name (\Computer01) I get a "you may not have permission to use this network resource" error.

If I go to the work station, and try the same thing except with the Server's IP (\000.00.0.100) and Name (\Server01) I get access.

This Workstation controls an I/O device that is used by a program running on the server (most of the time, not while I'm doing the install of course) and the program uses the Workstation's Computer Name to access it.

As far as I can tell all the settings on this Workstation match the 3 that are running the same programs, but I could have missed something.

I'm a bit stumped by this, I don't normally deal with the Server side of the computers. I usually just set up the workstations to whatever Name/IP the Net-admins give me. But my bosses put me in charge of this little network, mainly because the Net-admins din't want to deal with it.

View 2 Replies View Related

Network :: Getting Message - PC Is Not Accessible?

Jul 8, 2012

I was trying to connect my computers on a home network so that I can access either one via the other.When I try however I get the message:

"***-PC is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions.

long failure: user account restriction. Possible reasons are blank passwords not allowed, logon hour restrictions, or a police restriction has been enforced.

That is the message from computer 1 to computer 2.

Computer 2 gives me the message:

Windows cannot access \***-PC

Check the spelling of the name. Otherwise, there might be a problem with your network. To try to identify and resolve network problems, click Diagnose.

View 2 Replies View Related

Windows 7 C Drive Is Not Accessible In XP?

Aug 31, 2012

I can not access shared windows 7 c drive in windows xp. how can i view these system

View 3 Replies View Related

Router Ip Address Is Not Accessible?

Jan 31, 2013

I have a linksys router and i'm having quite a big issue. it's been since 2010 that I bought it and have no problems up until recently. I was playing/ going through all the security settings just to what all there was to secure my router. I noticed an ip setting and I 95% sure I did something which changed it; and now i am unable to access my router settings. Whenever I type the old ip address (192.168.1.1 or any of the few other ip addresses) it gives error page and says this page is non existent or it gives me a link to click on with the failed ip address to do a google search. My question is, is there any way that I can reset the router (like a system restore on a computer),

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 / K9 Unable To Ping Over Site To Site IPSEC

Jul 12, 2012

I am trying to set up a site to site ipsec connection. AT site A, I have Vlan's 652-10.55.216.0/24, Vlan653 -10.55.217.0/24, Vlan 654-10.55.217.0/24 and Vlan655-10.55.219.0/24 and at site B, Vlan650-10.55.214.0/24 and Vlan651-10.55.215.0/24.The problem is that I am unable to get any associations when i do a "sh crypto isakmp sa"/"sh crypto ipsec sa" on either router at each site.I am also unable to ping by pluging in a laptop into the site at each site. Laptop at site A is set to access vlan 655 and laptop at site B is set to acess vlan 651. I can ping all the devices from one end to the other.I have turned on debug crypto isakmp, debug crypto ipsec, debug crypto ipsec errors but dont get anything at all as output.I have attached the sh run for each router Cisco (1941/K9) and switch (Catalyst 3750) at each site.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5525 - Configure Site-To-Site IPsec VPN To 3 Peers

Nov 21, 2012

I have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: ASA 5510 - Site To Site IPSEc VPN Configuration Access List

Sep 12, 2011

I configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
 
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27

My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2901 / 2921 / 5505 ASA - Router Versus Firewall Site To Site VPN?

May 30, 2013

I would like to know both Cisco 2901 or 2921 router and Cisco 5505 ASA can build site to site VPN.
 
1) what is the different to build site to site VPN between router and firewall ?

2) which is the best choice if using in site to site VPN connection ? 

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5510 Site-to-Site VPN Internet Access From Branch Office For Group

Mar 6, 2013

Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office.  The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5505 Connection To Mapped File Shared Dropping On A Site-to-Site VPN

Nov 27, 2011

We've just deployed a site-to-site VPN using a 5505 ASA on the client's site and a checkpoint Nokia FW on our site. Everything seems to be fine except that the user's connections to their file shares seem to be intermittently dropping. One minute the connection to the shares is there, next thing it's lost. There is no logic to it because no two users are experiencing issues at the same time, as a matter of fact even on the same PC where a user has access to 3 shares on 3 different servers, one could be showing as connected whereas the other two be dropping. [code]
 
As you can see the Duplex and Speed are set to auto, I've rectified this since then and I'm keeping a close eye on the output errors, and collisions. However, I'm afraid that this did not rectify the issue and the users are still experiencing intermittent connection dropping to their file shares over the VPN!

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 / Site To Site VPN Using Public Addresses On Local Network

Jul 28, 2011

I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
 
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 Implicit Deny Access Rule Blocking Site-to-Site VPN?

Apr 22, 2012

I've setup a site to site vpn on an ASA 5510 using ASDM (as I have many times before) and the tunnel appears to be up but I am not able to pass traffic.  When I run the packet tracer from my inside network to the remote destination network, it shows that it is blocked by the implicit deny ip any any rule on my inside incoming access list.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 Site To Site RTP Traffic Is Hitting Deny All Rule?

Aug 13, 2012

Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.

Currently the rules are as follows
 
 Incoming External
allow ip any any
allow tcp any any
allow udp any any
default deny

 [code].....
 
It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 - AnyConnect Users Cannot Access Remote Office Over Site-to-site

Jul 15, 2012

we have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.

Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4

Site A internal: 192.160.x.x     External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x     External: 66.66.666.54(all)

I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?

Here is my NAT config:

nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Remote Client Cannot Connect To Local Network Or Site To Site ASA 5510

Jul 21, 2011

I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.

I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2911 - Site-to-site IPsec Vpn / Unable To Ping Remote Network

Apr 3, 2013

I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
  
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5

[Code].....

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 8.2(1) / ASDM 6.2(1) - Site-to-site Connection Creation Broke AnyConnect Access

Feb 7, 2012

ASA = 8.2(1)
ASDM = 6.2(1)
 
Recently I used the wizard to create an IPsec site-to-site connection, which went very smoothly; however, I now noticed that when I connect via Anyconnect 2.5.0217 I cannot get to local and subnatted resources on the network.
 
I rolled back to saved config file, which was taken before the site-to-site vpn was created, but that did not work as well.What should I check to see why I can no longer get to different subnets after the site-to-site vpn connection.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Identity NAT Configuration For Remote Access VPN And Site-to-Site

Mar 9, 2011

I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .

i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
 
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 - ISP Site To Site Failover With Single Remote Peer Address

Apr 16, 2011

I have a ASA 5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.
 
Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.
 
how we immplement the same on ASA 5510.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco :: ASA 5505 Site To Site RTP Traffic Is Hitting Deny All Rule?

Aug 14, 2012

Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.

Currently the rules are as follows

Incoming External
allow ip any any
allow tcp any any
allow udp any any
default deny

[code]....

It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.

View 3 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: WRVS4400N Site To Site VPN Drops After Time?

Mar 6, 2008

I have a new WRVS4400N configured with a site to site VPN to connect to my office.  At the office, we're running a Cisco PIX 515E.  I have successfully established an IKE preshared key and the tunnel is listed as Up.  I can successfully connect through the VPN tunnel into the office network through the tunnel and all seems good.  After some period of time, the tunnel apparently goes into a bad state.  Access to the office network is no longer available.  When looking at the VPN status screen, the Linksys indicates that the tunnel is up.  However, I cannot ping any resources on the office lan.  If I disconnect and connect the site to site VPN tunnel, it connects and comes back up successfully.  It seems like there is some sort of timeout taking place here.  I am running the 1.1.03 firmware.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Adding Multiple Site To Site VPNs In ASA 5510

Oct 10, 2012

I have a ASA 5510 at our corporate HQ that has one site to site VPN. I need to add 6 additional site to site VPN's to this ASA for our remote branches. How can I add them without affecting the existing site to site VPN?  The 6 site to site VPN's will all have the same settings however these settings are different from the existing site to site that I already have set up. How can I set it up so the 6 additional VPN's use their own crypto map and all use the same settings?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: SRP527W Site-to-Site VPN Not Hiding Internal Addresses?

Jun 11, 2013

We recently purchased an SRP527W router because of its capability to configure site-site VPN tunnels. The configuration of IKE and IPSEC is working and the tunnel comes up but the problem is that the router is passing our internal IP addresses through the tunnel. The remote end we are connecting to requires us to hide all traffic behind one IP address which would ideally be our external static IP address from our ISP.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: AES-128 IPSEC Site-to-Site VPN Multiple Crypto Maps For One Peer

Jan 28, 2013

With à customer we have à site to site VPN connection. In this tunnel there is one subnet routed with a 3des-sha encryption / hash. Now the want to add a new subnet in this tunnel, but with a AES-128 / MD5 encryption / hash. Is it correct if we make a new crypto map with a higher seq. number?

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved