Protocols / Routing :: How To Change IP To Specific State And City
Jan 19, 2011I wanted to change ip address to certain region and more specifically a city. How would I go about doing this?
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Protocols / Routing :: Forcing Use Of Specific Outbound Port?
Jan 24, 2013force something such as a Telnet client to use a particular outbound port when opening the TCP connection?
View 3 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: How To Change My Ip
Apr 12, 2011How can i actually change my ip...tryed those cmd things but nothing works. Ineed to change ip somehow.
View 1 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Can You Change Your IP Address
Sep 17, 2011So I want to watch some videos on justin.tv, but for some reason I have been IP blocked. I actually went on their support forums and the guy basically said "I picked up a bad IP address", so I didn't do anything wrong, I just got unlucky.
View 3 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Change MTU On Public Network?
Aug 24, 2011I'm trying to connect an Xbox 360 to my University's wireless network using a bridged connection between the wireless adapter and the LAN adapter. I can connect to the internet on the Xbox, but not Xbox LIVE. I get an error message stating that my MTU setting must be 1364 or higher. I obviously cannot access the router settings because they are the schools routers and I do not have administrative privileges. So, Is there some other way to modify MTU settings without that access?
View 1 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Change Assigned External Ip Address?
Mar 30, 2011How can I change my external IP address which is assigned
View 1 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Change Ip Address Without Changing Internet Connection?
Jun 11, 2011How i can change my ip address without changing my internet connection??
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow To Change Network Media State
Apr 22, 2011need to know how to change media state from disconnected to connected
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 861W Fast Ethernet Continual State Change
Jul 11, 2011I am having some issues with a 861W router connected to a cable modem. Traffic is passing fine but my SNMP monitoring tool is showing continual changes to the ifLastChage mib. [code]
View 8 Replies View RelatedDifference Between Open And Vendor Specific Protocols?
Nov 28, 2012What is the difference between open protocols and vendor specific protocols?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: AS 65100 - Change Local Preference For A Specific Network
Oct 12, 2012As you can see at the picture below i have 2 routers connected via two fastethernet links. Both routers running BGP. R1 (AS 65100) and R2 (AS65000).
R1 got a loopback interface with the IP address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 R2 got two loopback interfaces 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 and 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255.
Let's say that i want the host 3.3.3.3 to go over fa0/1 to reach 1.1.1.1 and rest of the network to go through fa0/0. What can I do to make this possible?
I know how to set Local Preference on an interface... but then all networks will take that specific path.
route-map LP_FA0/1 permit 10 set local-preference 200 neighbor 192.168.2.1 route-map LP_FA0/1 in
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7513 PSU In TBD State?
Oct 23, 2012I would like to request assistance from all the gurus here for an issue i have with a Cisco 7513MX PSU. There probably arent many people who are aware of 7500 chassis as they are quite old.Isse: PSU 1 failed in chassis and we tried to replace it. Once replaced, we are getting the following output for it:
1#sh env all
Arbiter type 2, backplane type 7513MX (id 2)
Power supply #1 is TBD (id 0), Power supply #2 is 1200W AC (id 1)
We have been researching on the internet for answers but unfortunately due to the age of this model, there is very limited information available. We did find information which suggested to have BOTH PSU 1 & 2 with same revision. Right now the chassis is running only on PS2, we dont want to take down the chassis just to confirm the revision number on the PSU and there is no way to see that on the CLI. What we can do is get another pair of same revision PSUs, insert PSU1 first THEN take out PSU2 and then insert the same revision as PS1 in PSU2 slot but the moment we insert PSU1 in we get that TBD state which is not normal status and raises our doubts about putting the same revision PSUs with the method above, there is a chance that after we insert PSU1 in, the moment we take out PSU2, the chassis might not run on PSU1 due to its abnormal state.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: N7K M1 Interfaces Stuck In Initializing State
Jul 12, 2012We did an upgrade from NX-OS 5.1.5 to 5.2.4 and found all M1 line card interfaces were stuck in initializing state for long time.'show module' status says ok. And we cannot execute shut/no shut command under the interface. N7K-M108X2-12L & N7K-M148GT-11 are the two M series cards. Only option was to downgrade back for the time being.
N7K01# sh int e1/1 | in down
Ethernet1/1 is down (initializing)
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Link State Propagation
Aug 7, 2011I have two Cisco 6500 switches connected via fiber, this is my small network. One end goes to a provider, and the other end goes to a server. My IT department wants some sort of link state propagation since the provider keeps going down, but the IT team is unaware until they contact me.
We provide a Layer2 point-to-point circuit, access ports at the ends. We use V LAN's to transport the traffic. Please let me know if there is anything I could do to support link state propagation.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 5510 / VPC Member Ports In Suspended State
Apr 18, 2012indicate why my ethernet ports are in suspended state for some reason, i need an indication why this may be and what i can do to fix this issue. configuration below. I have a 7010 which i'm using to connect to two 5510's. I have one vPC connecting the two 5510's to the 7010. I have a vPC domain configured between the 5510's. and no issues at all. My Nexus 7010 port channel members are suspended for some reason.
Nexus 7010
vpc domain 100
role priority 100
peer-keepalive destination 192.168.1.2 source 192.168.1.1 vrf vpc-keepalive
!
interface Ethernet 3/1
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Err-disable Port State Recovery
Jan 25, 2012I am testing 2960 24 S with storm-control and Errdisable Port timer interval 60s , connected HUB on fa0/17 to make traffic / loop.After Strom Control detection the interface goes down thats ok after 60s they will try to recover the interface and going up although the loop is still there.For my understanding if the interface detect still a loop on that interface they will disable the port again for 60s and will check again. [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Port Goes Into Error Disable State 3750
Jun 29, 2012We have a number of 3750 stacks used as access layer switches connecting Siemens VOIP phones and then a PC that connects to the phone.
For example if I plug PC A to the phone that connects to port 13 I pick up an IP addressand all works as predicted now if I plug in PC A to any other VOIP phone that connect to another port on the same switch it goes in error disable state ITs like the switch is holding my PC mac address and locks it down with the port which in my case is Gi2/0/13.
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/13
switchport access vlan 726
switchport mode access
[Code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G / (int Fa1/0/26) Connected To Switch / Goes In Err-disable State
Mar 30, 2013I am cascading one new switch 3750G (int Gi1/0/1) with an existing 3750G (int fa1/0/26) switch.. But the interface fa1/0/26 goes in err-disable state even after NO SH.. also i have diable Spanning treebpdu guard and disable spanning tree portfast. But still the issue is not resolved.
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Faulty State In New Module Inserted In 4500
May 18, 2010We inserted a new module with 48 rj45 ports in a 4500 with just one supervisor module. We have two 4500, and we tried the new model in the other 4500 and it´s working properly and giving a OK status. Furthermore, the module´s LED status is green. We saw that there are 8 ports (from 17 to 24) that are in faulty state, so probably this is the cause for the faulty state for the module.
We tried already a Hw reset, replace/insert again the module...
We are almost sure that it can be a Hw failure. We are getting the following results different commands:
show module :
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
7 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4548-GB-RJ45 JAXXXXXXXH
M MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
[Code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6513 Switch Giving Module 11 In Power Down State
Apr 7, 2012After a power problem at our data centre we find Module 11 of our Cisco 6513 Core Switch in PWR Down state.Show Module 11 returns: Status: PWRDownShow Power Status Module 11 returns: OperStatus Off (Module Reset due to an exception or user request).The command:
Power enable Module 11 was issued and returned the following: %PM_SCP-SP-1-LCP_FW_ERR: System resetting module 11 to recover from error: Linecard received system exception. Errcode = 2509000001.%OIR-SP-3-PWRCYCLE: Card in module 11 is being powercycled Öff (Module reset due to exception or user request%C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: Power to module in slot 11 set off (Module Reset due to exception or user request),We have restarted the switch twice. The module is currently not passing traffic causing downtime to services.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Cannot Get VLAN In Spanning Tree Forwarding State
Dec 9, 2012We have a pair of 6500 switches, each having a trunk going to each access switch. We set the spanning tree priority on Core1 so it is the root bridge for all VLANs. We have two different types of access switches:
-3550 setup as VTP client and ISL
-2960 setup as VTP transparent and dot1q.
Pruning is disabled but we use "switchport trunk allowed vlan" to restrict which VLANs go through each trunk. When we need to permit a VLAN through a trunk, we simply run "switchport trunk allowed vlan add <VLANID>" on the access switch and both core switches. If it is a 2960 in VTP transparent mode, we must set the VLAN to active. Once this is done, a "show int trunk" will reflect the new VLAN in "Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned" for Core1.
I recently went through this process to add VLAN 250 on a 3550 access switch, but the VLAN is not listed in STP forwarding state and not pruned. I tried removing the VLAN from the trunks and redoing it, but there is was no change. I tried adding VLAN 257, but the same behavior happened. I then tried trunking the same VLANs to a few other access switches. Three other 3550s experienced the same behavior, but I was able to trunk the VLAN to a few 2960 switches. At this point, I figured it might be related to some kind of limitation of VTP or the 3550 switches. I provisioned a new 3550 with the same IOS and settings (VTP client, ISL). To my surprise, all VLANs configured were in STP forwarding state and not pruned.
Running show spanning-tree on the core and access switch shows VLAN 250 as designated FWD. I confirmed we are not hitting the limits in "show spanning tree summary totals" on the Core or Access switches. I also confirmed we are not hitting the virtual port limit by running "show vlan virtual-port slot x."My next action might be to shut/no shut the uplink to Core1 from the access switch, but I'm not sure if that will fix it and even if it does, I have no clue what caused the issue.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2950G - Putting Fa0/2 In Error-disable State
Mar 28, 2012I have a Catalyst 2950G when I activate the switchport port-security, but I want to empty the black list of mac address because every time I connect a device, the port is automatically désacative, here is the port configuration:
!
interface FastEthernet0 / 2
switchport access vlan 17
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 51
[code]....
I tried the following commands to clear the blacklist mac address of that port, but the problem is still relevant:
# Clear mac-address-table dynamic int fa0 / 2
# clear port-security all int fastethernet 0/2
# clear errdisable interface fa0 / 2 vlan
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Sup VS-S720-10G Traffic Forwarding In Active And Hot State
Jan 24, 2012I have catalyst 6500s with two VS-S720-10Gs, one is in Active and one is in Hot state. Both Sup cards have two 10G uplink ports. How does the traffic forwarding works in this case on the uplink ports? Do these uplink ports actively forward traffic or it is only the uplinks ports on Active that forward traffic? I see CDP neighbors on both Active and Hot SUPs uplinks ports - it indicates that packets are flowing on both cards.
I want all uplink ports on both SUPs to actively forward traffic. Does it work? What is the config for this?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C3750E-24PD Incorrect License State Shown On 1 Switch
Mar 9, 2012Recently on two switches, both being same cisco WS-C3750E-24PD, running with same IOS c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin got noticed that the license state of one switch is showing incorrectly as shown below [code] I will not be able to execute any changes/modifications on switch as of now.
View 9 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Switch Port Auto-state Exclude Command Not Working In 4500
Jun 3, 2013I have configured a SVI in my 4500 ( Sup 7-E 10GE,,,,,,and,,,,,cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.02.00.SG.150-2.SG.bin) switch and it is showing Down Down, because there were no active switch port in the vlan, I added one switch port to this vlan but this port also in the down state, so i added the SWITCH PORT AUTO STATE EXCLUDE command under this port, even after this also the SVI never came up, So i added one systen to the port so both the switch port and the SVI came up...So why SWITCH PORT AUTO STATE EXCLUDE command have no effect in this model of the switch..
View 4 Replies View RelatedRouters / Switches :: Rate Limit On Specific Port From Specific Range?
Jul 1, 2012Is it possible to enable an absolute value rate limit using QOS on a HP ProCurve 5406 switch for a particular IP range on a specific port? Is there a way to configure our HP 5406 with an absolute rate limit on "WAN" port for that server's IP range? I would like to limit it to only being capable of sending 1Mbps worth of traffic over the head end at once.Everything in the documentation points towards priority queues, which as far as I can tell, isn't really what I want.Baring accomplishing this goal using rate limiting is there a better way to prevent our services from accidentally saturating this connection?i thimkong about somthing like that:
class ipv4 rate-limit-port-A1
match ip 10.136.0.0/16 any
exit
policy qos port-a1-ratelimit
class servers-to-be-slowed action rate-limit kbps 1000
exit
interface A1 service-policy port-a1-ratelimit inI'm not sure about this.
Cisco Routers :: RV082 - Route Specific Ip Address To Specific WAN Port
Oct 25, 2011I use a router RV082 with load balancing. My problem is when I try to access a specific site, I get the error message that my IP address changes and I can not use 2 ip address. I want to specify an ip range to always use the same WAN port.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: ASA 5520 / Define Specific IKE Proposal For Specific L2L Tunnel?
May 24, 2011ASA 5520 running 8.0.4
ASDM v.6.1
Need assistance understanding how in ASDM/Configuration/Site-to-Site VPN/Connection Profiles/ "Any Entry" I can specify that I only want to offer an IKE Proposal of pre-share-aes-256-sha?
The IKE Proposal field has a number of possible options including: pre-share-aes-256-md5, pre-share-3des-md5, pre-share-aes-256-sha, pre-share-aes-192-sha, pre-share-3des-md5, pre-share-aes-sha and pre-share-3des-sha.
I am able to pick a specific IPSec Proposal w/o issue but when I attempt to do the same for the IKE Proposal, and click OK the choice does not "stick" but rather returns to the entire list as defined above.
Cisco WAN :: 2801 / Assign Specific IP To Specific Host By MAC
Dec 18, 2012I have a Router 2801 with the run conf :
!
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.63
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.192 192.168.1.254
!
[code]....
I want to assign a specific IP to a specifig host by MAC .. for example i want the ip 192.168.1.10 to be assign to the host "client1" by mac.I've been creating a new dhcp pool static:
!
ip dhcp pool static
host 192.168.1.10 255.255.255.0
hardware-address xxxx.xxxx.xxxx
client-name client1
!
but the "client1" is still taking other ip.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5510 Routing Specific Traffic To Inside Router
Nov 7, 2012I have an ASA 5510, with Ethernet0 connected to Internet via a T1 line, Ethernet1 connected to LAN1, and Ethernet2 connected to LAN2. LAN1 & LAN2 are independant, but share the Internet connection, via the T1 line. On LAN2, I have another router that connects to the Internet, via a Comcast line. I wish to route some of the traffic on LAN2 (10.38.77.0) to the other Router, on LAN2 (10.38.77.12) (connected to the Comcast line). I have entered the following lines:
route inside2 10.11.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.38.77.12 1
route inside2 10.252.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.38.77.12 1
route inside2 172.22.6.0 255.255.255.0 10.38.77.12 1
I can trace the routes from the ASA 5510 (1st hop is to 10.38.77.12), but not from anything else on LAN2.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Filter A Specific Host(s) From OSPF Routing Table On A ASA 5550 (ABR)?
May 22, 2013I am attempting to filter a specific host(s) from my OSPF routiing table on a ASA 5550 (ABR) using LSA prefix lists. However, when I look at the other routers in that area, I notice that ALL LSA type-3's are being removed (10 hosts are now missing from the routing table). I have verified the filter is working on the ABR, but I can't figure why ALL hosts/routes that were coming into the area are now being filtered instead of the specific one that I want to filter out.
Here is the config on the ABR:
prefix-list pdm_pl_000 seq 10 permit 206.253.180.137/32
!
!
router ospf 1
network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
network 10.150.10.0 255.255.255.0 area 10
network 10.150.252.0 255.255.255.224 area 10
[code]....
The 206.253.180.137 host is actually coming from Area '3'. Am I doing something that is removing all type-3 LSA's?
Why WAN Protocols Like Frame-relay / HDLC And PPP Are Called Layer2 Protocols
Aug 20, 2011why the WAN protocols like Frame-relay, HDLC and PPP are called Layer2 protocols?What is the address scheme they use?
View 5 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Hosted VPN / IP Forwarding / Routing And Bridging?
Apr 5, 2011I have got a PC at work (Windows XP Pro SP3) that is on two networks with the IPs 10.20.30.167, subnet 255.255.255.0 (internet enabled) and 10.0.0.20, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). On the 10.0.0.X network there is a gateway with the IP 10.0.0.200 allowing access to another network; 192.168.60.X, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). I have added the route on my work PC to access the 192.168.60.X network via this gateway and I can access all PCs on all three networks from this PC.Now, I am using LogMeIn Hamachi so that I can access the networks at work from home. The PC at work is the 'gateway' PC on the Hamachi network. When installing Hamachi it created a new network connection and bridged this connection with my 10.20.30.167 network adapter to allow access to the 10.20.30.X network from an external PC when connected using the Hamachi VPN connection. I have manually configured my Hamachi connection on my PC at home to the IP 10.20.30.169, subnet 255.255.255.0, with the default gateway set to 10.20.30.167. I can ping all computers on the 10.20.30.X network from my PC at home.
I then added a route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X to go via 10.20.30.167 (the 'gateway' on the Hamachi network). I also enabled IP forwarding on the 'gateway' PC (my PC at work). I can not ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X network from my PC at home apart from 10.0.0.20 (the other NIC in the Hamachi gateway PC) and 10.0.0.30 (another PC on the 10.20.30.X network that is also on the 10.0.0.X network).Now, with IP forwarding enabled on the Hamachi gateway PC I would assume after adding the route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X traffic to go via 10.20.30.167 that I would be able to ping all PCs on the 10.0.0.X network...I also tried adding a route on my home PC to send all traffic for the 192.168.60.X network via 10.20.30.167 which has a route via 10.0.0.200 to the 192.168.60.X network, but this also did not work.I then tried adding the 10.0.0.20 network adapter into the network bridge that the Hamachi connection made, also keeping both IPs (10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20) on this network bridge by adding them into the 'IP Settings' in the 'Advanced TCI/IP Settings'. I also added the 10.0.0.200 gateway for good measure. I still cannot ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X or 192.168.60.X networks from my PC at home.
I have also added the route to the 10.20.30.X network on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to go via 10.0.0.20 and tried pinging a PC on the 10.20.30.X network but this also has not worked. Also setting the default gateway on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to 10.0.0.20 does not allow this...Surely bridging the networks 10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20 on my work PC would allow another PC on the 10.0.0.X network to access the 10.20.30.X network after adding the route or setting 10.0.0.20 as the default gateway?
