Cisco :: Router 2921 Base Load Supports Natting
Nov 13, 2012If Cisco Router 2921 base load supports NAtting? I am looking to order a Router and want to make sure the new 2900 routers support Natting.
View 2 RepliesIf Cisco Router 2921 base load supports NAtting? I am looking to order a Router and want to make sure the new 2900 routers support Natting.
View 2 RepliesHow to install IP base liecense and Unified communication liecense in 2921 router?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'd like to know if is it possible to load lan base image on Cisco Switch 2960 TC-S. This model (WS-C2960-48TC-S) come with lan lite image and it's the same (phisically) of the 2960 TC-L (lan base image).If I try to upload the lan base image on flash of 2960 TC-S will works?? ..or the switch goes damaged?
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoes 3650-X IP Base support Static Load Balancing or i should upgrade to ip service SW ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe are using 18 numbers of 3560X -Lan base series switches in our network(Access layer). We have 400 users and created vlans in access switches. we are planning to purchase Two numbers of 4900 M as Core layer switch and for redundancy. The uplink would be on 10 gig copper cable (CAT 7) between the access layer switches and core switches. I like to know whether 4900M can take the load of 18 access switches.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have deploy a Cisco ISR 2921 to connect two ISP for internet access, Link 1 is fix public IP, link 2 is xDSL.And we configure dual link load-balance, the configure just like the famous DOC "[URL]" name:"dual internet links NATing with PBR and IP SLA". Inside network to internet is ok, and traffic was load-balance, Dual link can be redundancy. But there has some issue we don't realize.Most people interesting how the inside traffic load-balance outside, but ignore the traffic from outside issue.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a internet router 2921 .my isp is providing 100 mbps internet link with static public ip network .I am using a default static route to the isp wan ip .I am planning to upgrade 100 mbps to 114 mbps .Unfortunately my isp doesnt have gig port in their side .So they are ready to provide two 57 mbps line .Isp agreed they will route my public ip networks in both the links .
As a result i have two 54 mbps link with same network with two wan networks .My question is whether two default static route to both wan ip will carry out the load sharing correctly ?
Eg :
172.24.66.0 255.255.255.252 -first link my fa0/1 172.24.66.1
172.24.66.4 255.255.255.252 -second link my fa0/2 172.24.66.5
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.6
1)For 3650X I found some contradiction in the Q&A about feature set LAN Base vs IP Base:
LAN Base: Can I do static IP routing ?
LAN Base: SVI => is this for intervlan routing ?
2)For 2960, there are 2 flavors (LAN lite and LAN BASE) Q: Can I do static routing on one of these flavors ?
I have a WS-C3750X-12S-S (IP Services) that I THINK I'd like to downgrade to LAN Base so I can stack it with a WS-C3750X-48T-L that is already LAN Base..
View 4 Replies View Relatedcan we upgrade 2960 switch from Lanbase IOS to IPbase
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe are using Cisco 1941 Router as CPE where we wanted to trap CPU, Memory & ISYSTEM MIB. The same we are achiveing using SNMPV2 but when we tried using SNMPV3, there is no response for these MIBs.
We tried to configure SNMPV3 using below Link but still there was issue. There was response fr [URL]
Wanetd to know SNMPV3 MIB are supported for Cisco 1941 Router IOS Code universalk 15.2(3)T1 & Data License. When we tried using Cisco IOS MIB Locator, we are not able to see any MIB for SNMPV3. whats is that mean. Does this Platform + IOS Support SNMPV3 or not.
Below is the Snapshot from Cisco IOS MIB Locator for said image.
[Code]......
I have a small network of about 12 Mac's running OS X, about 20 or so iOS devices and a OS X Server. Currently i have a Cisco SRP547W which works fine when we're all wired in, however we have connection issues when trying to access the server over Wi-Fi. I'm lead to believe that this could be a result of the lack of support for Bonjour within the router. What might be a solid alternative?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI work for a non-profit agency and a donor gave us a generous donation of used Cisco equipment. One of the items is a SM-VAM2+. We tried it in a 7206VXR chassis with a NPE-G2 running 12.4(24)T6 and the router keeps barking that the SM-VAM2+ is not supported in the chassis. We have done searches on the Cisco web site and Google and there is no information regarding the SM-VAM2+ at all (all of the references are for the SA-VAM2+).
The question is if the SM-VAM2+ is supported on the 7206VXR with another version of IOS or what router supports the SM-VAM2+?
Is there a wireless router available that will support a free dynamic DNS provider such as [URL], without the need for custom firmware?
I have a device that requires DDNS, and I do not want to mess with firmware updates. I've already bricked a router trying to do that. So I'm looking for a replacement router that requires little to no modifications to use a free DDNS provider.
Which routers support SNMP? I need to track usage coming through our network/router. Our internet co claims we are using at least double what our computer tracking software says. We currently have the E3000.
View 5 Replies View RelatedMy 2691 Router has already 2 serial cards WIC-1DSU-T1 installed, When i install the 3rd serial card and reboot the router, it detects the 3rd card installed but 3rd card has no light.
When i do sh ver it shows 3 cards installed.
When i install this 3rd serial card to other Router then light shows on card and it works fine
So i am thinking if 2691 Router only supports 2 serial cards?
I'm looking for a device which will allow me to forward all internet bound traffic through a L2L IPSec tunnel from branches to a central hub and internet connection.
I've recently purchased a RV120W(as a test branch device) which i've tried to get working with the ASA5505 at the central site. I can get the VPN to come up but can't manage to get the internet bound traffic through it. Reading up on the issue, it looks like full tunneling or IPsec wildcard forwarding isn't supported on the RV120W and RV220W devices [URL] The source mentions that the RV0xx series supports this feature, however one of my requirements is wireless on the device.
Any device which supports this rather than just the standard split tunneling, alternatively a workaround which will allow me to use RV120Ws at branch sites? Would an SRP521 support what i'm trying to achieve?
The ASR1000 router supports hot-swap modules and network interfaces?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have Cisco 2651XM and currently running old IOS c2600-is-mz.123-26.bin (IP PLUS) which I used the NAT protocol. I was wondering can I use IP-BASE on this router and I am not sure if this feature set has NAT protocol.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Linksys WRT54GL Router. I'm open to getting another router if it won't suit my needs.Which firmware should I install?Which version/build of the firmware?Any additional modifications I should make to the firmware?
Requirements:Connect an external hard drive to the router, so that any devices connected to the router can access files from the hard drive.Run an FTP server (with SSH) on the router, so files on the external hard-drive can be accessed from anywhere.Run VPN, so that certain computers can access the hard drives over VPN.Run a BitTorrent client on the router with the files stored on the external hard drive.
I would like to ask for a cisco wireless router that supports captive portal. I notice that WAP321 supports this but what other additional units should be added in order to accomplish this. Client wants the user to authenticate first and also to see who logs in.
View 0 Replies View RelatedNeed basic wireless configuration for a SOHO Cisco 1811W router? I just need the wireless to connect to the base wired LAN - with both WEP and MAC authentication. And - can the MAC auth. parameters be configured via CLI and not have to use either SDM or CP? I can access the router via SDM - but the Wirless Application will not fire up - and CP doesn't work at all.
View 18 Replies View RelatedI need a router to connect to our ISP by BGP and in a future to a second ISP. Our ISP is going to provide us about 300.000 route entries by BGP. So router 2921 would be enough??? or should i go to a higher model?We are going to have 100Mbps with this ISP and probably in 3 months we'll have to double it. Also we'll need IPv6 support.I saw router performance [URL]f and it's has 480.000 PPS and 245 Mbps but for 64 bytes lenght packages. If the packets are bigger the throughput should be best I suppose... 1500 bytes about 5,5 Gbps. In the case you consider the model is sufficient, the flash or RAM should be increased?
View 4 Replies View RelatedFirst I'm sharing a network via bridging from my dads house. Everything works perfect. I'm using a router at my house with no problems. At his house he as a modem hooked to net gear router and the acer will not connect to internet via wifi. So I bring the thing up to my house and it connects fine via wifi. The acer will connect using a eithernet cable at his house but not wifi.
I was wondering if the acer is getting confused cause his router is hooked to a modem?I've tested and tryed everything under the sun and nothing seems to work.I know theres nothing wrong with the wifi software or hard ware in the acer cause it connects fine And surfs the web via wifi at my house but not at my dads.
I was wondering if it is at all possible to set up a DIR-655 as a wireless base station for any router (specifically a netgear wrg614 v10). I've read that the DIR-655 can be set up as an access point, but with my current situation it's not currently possible.If this is not compatible with this specific netgear router, is there any other solution besides having to purchase a dedicated access point?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a LAN with multiple VLANs connected through Catalyst 3750 with IP Base image. In IP Base the router only supports PIM stub multicast (no PIM multicast routing),But I have an ASA connected to the internal router and to the internet router.Asa supports PIM multicast routing and can act as PIM RP. With this configuration, is there a way to configure an internal multicast network? That is a multicast server in one internal vlan (VLAN 1) and multicast clients in VLAN 2. Both VLANs connected to the C3750 router.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have purchased a number of 2911 routers.We got Base & security license as we wanted to enable encryption. However we probably wont use the security.We are replacing 2811 routers.Unfortunately the 2811 routers have FXS ports with 2 - 4 POTS handsets - I completely forgot about these ports when I was ordering.Now I have VIC3-FXS cards which are ok in the 2911 but unfortunately I cant get them to work.I am missing PVDMs (well adapters anyway), and even if I got them the router wont take any commands relating to voice due to the license.Is is possible to 'rehost' the security and turn it into a UC ?I am new to these 2911 and Licensing.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there a recommended number of GRE tunnels that Cisco 2921 ISR router with default configuration (512MB DDR2 ECC DRAM) can support?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am installing a security license on Cisco 2911 Router for the first time. It already has a temporary license installed on it which is expiring soon. Cisco has already mailed me the procedure for installation. I want to know if i need to uninstall the previous license before installing the new one.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe recently acquire a cisco 2921/K9 router to interface 2 networks
Network 1 : 169.254.XXX.XXX/16 on GigabitEthernet0/0 interface
Network 2 : 192.168.1.XXX/24 on GigabitEthernet0/1 interface
On the network 1 side there is a multicast source (169.254.200.200 destination : 225.0.0.1) on the network 2 side there is 1 receiver which is not multicast capable(old) but i want it to receive the multicast stream for the moment we configure the ip multicast-routing and each interface each interface with ip pim sparse-dense-mode then configure the GigabitEthernet0/1 in order to join the multicast group (using ip igmp static-group 225.0.0.1) and wireshark confirm that the multicast stream on the network 2 side from 169.254.200.200 -> 225.0.0.1 of course the receiver don't the stream, but if i force a "multicast to unicast" process inside the router it shall be ok.. after many hour of internet browsing i found 2 solution :
- NAT, [URL]
- multicast service reflection (Cisco documentation)
The NAT example don't work ,what is the best way to do this task.
I need to configure cisco router 2921 for snmp v3,
View 5 Replies View RelatedI just purchased thie Cisco 2921 router and have all the configuration completed except the Firewall and NAT. We have 4 supnets at our location on the router each with a DHCP handed from the router to our network. Any examples for the Firewall and Nat configurations?
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe have a 2300 RPS with single 1150WAC power supply (C3K-PWR-1150WAC) which is connected to one 2921 Router. But it is not backing the rotuer.
Router 2921 running IOS
c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-2.T1.bin
I am getting the following logs:
*** External Redundant Power Supply is present, but type is unknown or not supported.***
%ENVMON-1-POWER_WARNING: : RPS Online Insertion and Removal is not supported.
Do we required any configuration to be done on Router end.
Note: The RPS is backing 2960 Switch.