Cisco Routers :: RV220W Machine Can't Send Or Receive Any Traffic To WAN Side
Aug 22, 2011
I have a RV220W (running fw version 1.0.2.4) that i am trying to configure for a client. They are set up on Comcast with 13 available IP's. I should note that this netowrk is now currently running without issue using a Cisco Pix 506e. Unfortunately, the Pix is almost impossible to configure using the GUI now as I have to load a 4-year old version of Java now just to get the PDM to load. But I digress.I've set up the RV using the identical settings as the Pix on bth the LAN and WAN side. When I do, computers on the LAN side can all reach the Internet ok. However, once I enable one-to-one NAT for an internal server, that machine can't send or receive ANY traffic to the WAN side. I've even tried setting access rules enabling ANY traffic in both directions, and that has no effect. Either I'm missing something, or this is just one more bug in this product.
Even though it was a bit of a step down going from the Pix to the RV220W, it was done for the ease of setting up VPN's as I was ready to purchase a second one for a new satellite office opening in a few weeks. It looks like we will be switching vendors on the router side as my faith in Cisco is waning at this point.
’m somewhat new to Cisco routers this is my first attempt at getting one to work. I work in an environment with multiple locations, most are using the Cisco Model: 2911/K9 or the Model: 2921/K9 routers running IOS Version 15.0.We just added a new small office and all I had in the way of a router was a Cisco C1841-IPBASE-M router, running IOS Version 12.4.When setting up the C1841 I kept the configuration pretty much the same as the others allowing for the differences in the OS. I can remote into the 0/0 (outside port) from over the network, I can ping to that port without fail, but I can’t send or receive traffic from the 0/1 (inside port).
Yesterday, I installed the N450 DB and it was probably the easiest install I've ever had to do. One problem though, I can now no longer send or receive email thru Outlook Express 6. Keep getting this message 'The host 'mail' could not be found. Please verify that you have entered the server name correctly. Account: 'mail', Server: 'mail', Protocol: POP3, Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Socket Error: 11001, Error Number: 0x800CCC0D'.
My ISP waits a definite host name from me to return my white IP address via DHCP. Can I set this parameter in RV220W router? I don't find such parameter in IPv4 WAN configuration page.
I sold a rv220w to a customer. I've configured it but it seems that the router doesn't allow anonymous smtp. I've configured outlook on a computer with authentification request and it's working fine.
There is a software on a computer that I'm unable to change the authentification and it's not working ( Not able to send message ) I've search in the router and I've disabled these rule : "Block Anonymous ICMP Messages".
I'm having problems connecting to the VPN. I can access the web portal, but cannot connect SSL VPN on my Mac 10.7, or a virtual windows 7 machines. I've read a lot of forum posts about the mac problem, but for some reason the Windows 7 machine won't connect SSL VPN on windows 7 x64, Chrome, FIreFox.
I tried downloading QuickVPN and set up a user account, but it just sits on the machine at the "Connecting" screen. My primary users will be running Windows 7 Professional x64.
I'm trying to setup an ASA and a UC540 side by side, to utilize the ASA for data networking and the UC540 for voice. This 'should' work fine, I just seem to be having an issue where the ASA seems to be blocking traffic from the voice network as it passes through.So here is the LAN setup:ASA: 1.1.1.1UC540: 1.1.1.2The UC has a voice vlan 10.1.1.1/24 and a service module at 10.1.10.1/30My PC uses the ASA as its default gateway, 1.1.1.1The ASA then has static routes to the UC networksRoute 10.1.1.1/24 1.1.1.2Route 10.1.10.1/30 1.1.1.2Ping from PC to the UC networks works fine. However, ping from the UC networks to PC fails. ASA logs show traffic being denied due to not having an established connection or something.My guess is that the traffic is being blocked because the egress and ingress paths are different? Traffic from the PC goes to the ASA, then gets routed to the UC and it works. However in the other direction, traffic from the UC is going directly to the PC and bypassing the ASA, because its a directly connected network and doesn't have to route through the ASA to get to the PC. The reply traffic from the PC DOES go through the ASA following its route table, thus the issue of the ASA not seeing the established connection?Same-security inter and intra interface is enabled.So I think I see the issue, I just don't know how to fix it. Is there something I can configure on the ASA to allow for this? My only other option would be to configure a /30 on a new vlan to handle the routing between the UC and ASA or something, but that seems like its going to make this simple setup way too complicated with extra networks, vlans, trunks, etc.I am running ASA version 8.4.5?
I have now the sa`s stablished between SRP527w and cisco 857, but If i ping from a host of Cisco side to a host of SRP side I get only rx traffic on the tunnel, the stats keep tx at 0 and ping is not answered.My tunnel is to send some voice call into IPSEC tunnel keeping DSCP bits, It comunicate SRP voice vlan with Cisco lan.
I have on SRP 2 vlans: 1 Vlan for data on ports 1,2 and 4 1 voice vlan on ports 1,2,3,4.
I connect a netbook to port 3 and I can connect to internet but I cant reach by ping the other side of the tunnel?Maybe traffic from voice vlan is being natted with data vlan ip address?I need all traffic must go into the tunnel without being natted, on cisco side I have a policy to avoid nat but don know if SRP have any problem about it too.All gateways are ok ?
I found this guide in order to send all traffic from RV042 branch office to the RV082 in the central office: [URL]
But that guide is for v2 hardware. I tried and did not work, so I wonder if there is newer info for v3 hardware (firmware v4.2)
I have a RV042 in a brach office connected via working VPN Tunnel to a RV082 central office. I want to route all traffic from the brach office to the RV082 in the central office.
I can receive but not send faxes. When I try to send an operator comes on and says please enter the number you are trying to reach. I plugged in another machine and it does the same thing.
Mail in yahoo alwaysworked until recent Sunday . Now can receive email but not send in yahoo Yet a sent copy is saved in my sent box. but my recepients do not get the mail
I recently migrated keeping my original email address. All went well, except I am unable to receive emails from one of my contacts. I can send to this individual successfully, but when the contact tries to respond the reply kicks back to him telling him that there was a delivery notice failure. Email addresses have been verified by both of us and both are accurate
At random times, my internet will "drop" connection and will not download any packets, but I am still able to send packets. My Local Area Connection icon continues to say I am connected, my modem is fully functional, and my cables are good. I can get my internet back up and running for 10 minutes or so by disable and re-enabling my Network Connection. If I simply try the "repair", it gives me an error at the "Refreshing IP" step.I have done a full system scan for viruses and I am clean. My drivers are fully updated, I have disabled my firewalls, and still no luck. During the times when it is down, I can successfully ping my modem through CMD, but I get the time-out error if I ping a site, my default gateway, the DHCP Server, or the DMS Servers.I have made no changes to any major settings on my computer, nor has there been any recent additions/removals of any software.
Just setup two RV220Ws with a IPsec VPN connection. All working well. However, I have a question regarding how to force ALL traffic from a VLAN to go thru the VPN.IPsec from site A (EU) to site B (USA) working good. On Site A I have a dedicated VLAN that needs to have ALL traffic (internet included) be sent thru the VPN tunnel. The main purpose of this is to have internet presence as if in the USA. This is necessary to access some sites available only in USA specially for the kids -their web sites will not display content because they're not in the USA at the moment. How do I accomplish this? I tried to setup a Static Route for the VLAN but you cannot setup a 0.0.0.0 destination route.
I have following issue with RV220W - the router seems to be dropping parts of traffic coming through it. The unit is brand new, the firewall is turned off, there are about 20 computers and 15 VOIP phones connected to it via Zyxel GS1910-48; all IPs are set to static DHCP records, in the last 3 hours the router rebooted about 3 times, then I turned on the log in. The router is producing insane number of warnings, as you may see from the log attached. I found this thread [URL] but no answer regarding this issue.
Wed May 15 13:03:10 2013(GMT) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] cvm_ipfwd_cache_flow: Failed to allocate flow info buffer Wed May 15 13:03:10 2013(GMT) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] WARNING:cvmx_ptr_to_phys() passed a NULL pointer Wed May 15 13:03:10 2013(GMT) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] cvm_ipfwd_cache_flow: Failed to allocate flow info buffer [Code]....
I just received my rv220w and perhaps I haven't got enough experience with cisco routers. How can I restrict traffic between different VLANs?
For example: Hosts in one VLAN shall only be allowed to access a web server in another VLAN. All other traffic should be blocked. I've created two VLAN with Inter VLAN Routing enabled. But it seems there's no way to install a firewall rule between VLANs.
On the Linksys E4200, the Internet wired connection side, I gave static IP address which is in the same network range as that of LAP2.When tried to ping from LAP1 to LAP2, ping doesnot happen. Any settings by which I can ping from LAP1 to LAP2.
I can connect to my mom's wireless network but now all of a sudden I can't get any pages to load. All I get is this page cannot be displayed screen. My computer shows I'm connected with an excellent signal but I can't get any pages to load, I can't even send and receive my e-mail.
I have a new problem with my dell inspiron n5010 laptop. I use windows7 32bit already and I didn't have any problem with that (Bluetooth), but now I use windows7 64bit and install all update drivers successfully and my Bluetooth working but after 1 day or shorter my Bluetooth not working although It is installed on my laptop and I can see it's Icon in system tray and I see in control panel and device manager that is Installed on my laptop successfully and all Bluetooth setting is checked and It is OK and also I can receive file from other device to my laptop but I can't send, because I don't have Bluetooth Icon in right-click (send to). If I reinstall the Bluetooth driver It works 1 day or shorter again! and after it don't working again! I reinstall my windows7 64bit again and again and install all drivers successfully again but this problem appear all the time. I am sure my drivers are last version and up to date. how can I solve this problem and see Bluetooth choise in Right-Click when I want to send a file. Note that I can receive files but I can't SEND!
We are upgrading from a Pix 515e to a ASA 5510 with CSC SSM. We cannot send outbound email or receive any email from the outside world. I have placed a call with Cisco Support with no luck. [code]
i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
example: Im using different vlans on my rv220W. Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
This is what i need: - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...
I've been having this problem on my desktop and it's really annoying when i try to play online games that need a constant connection.I have Windows XP and i'm using a wireless connection via a wireless USB adapter. The problem is that the internet is running fine but at random intervals it starts to not send or receive any packets. This will usually cause my to disconnecting during a game causing other players inconvenience. After I d/c the internet will usually take 5-30 seconds to start sending and receiving packets again and regain connection.
So i have a dell latitude e6400 laptop running windows XP. Now whenever I connect to my home wireless network, it will connect fine but randomly it will stop sending or receiving data. Therefore i cannot connect to any websites and i get a connection error. I check my connection though and it is running through an excellent connection.
i configured cisco asa 5520 as cisco ezvpn server and cisco 891 as ezvpn client .the configurtion is working fine.i am using client mode on the ezvpn client side.but my quesion is , is it possible to communicate to ezvpn client side internal ip from the ezvpn server side?and one more thing what is the benefit of network extension mode on the client side and how it will work what are possible changes need to do in the server and the client side.
A company I work for has a number of CSM modules (WS-X6066-SLB-APC) installed in 6513 chasis switches. The CSM modules are running version 4.2(14)These CSM modules are configured to load-balance a number of vservers via serverfarms, each serverfarm containing multiple real servers.
The company is facing a problem with what seems to be related to return code checking. Every once in a while a server will suddenly not receive any traffic for 5 minutes. This always occurs right after the server has sent a HTTP 503 return code. However we cannot see in the CSM logs that the CSM module has actually disabled the real server. For other serverfarms which are running regular HTTP and/or ICMP health checks to real servers we can clearly see in the CSM logs when a real server has been temporarily disabled due to health check failures.
The return code checking is set to disable a real server for 300 seconds after the CSM has received five HTTP 503 responses from the real server. If we check the real server log however we cannot find more than that single 503 return code right before the server stops seeing any incoming traffic unless we move back at least hours in time.I have tried to figure out what time frame those 5 return codes must be received within for them to count towards the maximum allowed return codes, but nowhere in no documentation can I find any information about this time frame.For all I know the CSM could keep track of every incoming 503 forever, until the maximum of five 503's is reached, and then the server is disabled for 300 seconds.
I just got my dad's old notebook (VAIO VPC F223FB) which is better than my older one. So, I did a backup and then managed to clean install a Windows 7 Professional x64.At first I had a problem with the drivers, because the internet wasn't connecting and the USB ports weren't detecting my External Drive. So, I tested other USB port and got it. Installed the drivers and I could connect to the wireless network. But it doesn't detect the ethernet cable! And I want it detecting because then it's faster. I already tried downloading the Ethernet Controller driver. At first, I downloaded through Sony's support site but it didn't recognize the driver. Now, it recognizes but still doesn't connect it. And when I tried Solving Connection Problems, it said the network gateway was accessible but Windows can't receive Internet network traffic.
My E1500 enters a state where the LAN-side (broadcast, etc.) works, but the WAN-side (internet connection) just goes away. If I go unplug and replug the E1500 the internet connectivity comes back.When this happens, the wireless indicator on my desktop (Dell with Intel wifi) says I have an internet connection, but I clearly don't.
I currently have 90 remote locations that have PIX501's. They are all running 6.3 on them. All of these locations are creating an IPSEC VPN to my ASA 5520 (8.4) at the data center. Web access at the remote locations is currently being handled with ACL thru split tunnels. This is getting increasingly not fun as I have to reach out and touch them one at a time whenever I have to allow more access to the net. Code...
I would like to keep my split tunnel (if possible) for ports 443 and 21. I allow access to "any" on those ports and have no plans to change it.
Can I send port 80 down the VPN tunnel to the Proxy/Web Filter and then return the results to the Remote Client.
I am monitoring 2 or more source interfaces which are running 1G traffic on each interface. Destination is 10G interface.There are 2 kinds of traffic running through the source interfaces: icmp and regular IP traffic. I am only interested in capturing icmp traffic. How can I achieve my goal?I don’t have any vlan traffic at all. Router is c6500.
We have one machine running an application accessible remotely. We have cisco877 router, and static ip to access the application remotely. We recently done an update of out application software which has changed the access port/link to application.
since we update the software We can access the application internally through local ip but is not accessible through WAN with static ip, as the port no has changed.
I not having much knowledge of networking don't know what changes should be made in router so it direct the traffic of static ip to the machine running the web application, as before.
I tried looking for clue in router through its SDM Express interface, but no joy.
I cannot get my server to send outgoing traffic through my network. I.e. If i try to connect to any of my services i get a very weak connection. Now, i can still CONNECT, i just don't get any data flow. I cant even PING the server internally, it just times out. Now, regardless of whether i use my internal IP/external domain, i get the same issue. I logged onto my computer and tried a speed test the download was normal (around ~20mbit) but the upload times out.
Here is the fun part, if i connect to the server using a switch, everything works fine! Is it my router or some stupid configuration issue? Router is a WRV54G (I hate this thing). Server is running windows 2008 and has a virtual machine.
