Can a 2504 wlc use a vlan ids of 190X? I have found that it supports 512 vlans but I have not found any restrictions in the id used.Vlan id 190X is distributed by the isp (they have the ASAs in their central site) so if it is not supported I must prepare a vlan transfer between switches.
View 4 RepliesI found 20Mhz bandwidth enable option in 2504 controller.But what about 40 Mhz .The access points(1142) are dual band...I hope it should support in 2504 controller also.If there is no option of 40Mhz
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 10Mbps connection link which I will like to reduce to 5Mbps on a 6509 switch as indicated in the config below. [code] After applying the service policy on the vlan interface, i got this "match vlan is not supported for this interface". I actually tried the rate limit command but I cant see the effect using the speedtest.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 1921 Router, a Cisco Catalyst 2960 and a Cisco Catalyst 2970 and I want the router to be able to assign ip-addresses by what VLAN a device is active on.
VLAN1: 10.0.0.0/24
VLAN2: 10.0.1.0/24
The router is connected to the Catalyst 2960 and there on to the Catalyst 2970 so the VLAN1 and VLAN2 is active on the to switches and the Router.is it possible?
We are installing a 2504 with management on VLAN2. The management port is on interface 1 which is attached to a layer 3 3750. From other VLANs in the network we cannot manage the 2504 controller with the web manager. We are running the latest code, 7.2.103.0, since we are using 3600 APs. We have a TAC case open, but spent 3 hrs with them and they can't figure out the problem. TAC did some debugging and saw that the 2504 is ARPing for the address of the PC on the other VLAN instead of sending the packet to its default gateway. How to get success with the management interface on a VLAN and managing the controller from another VLAN?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIt seems like the 4-ports switch in the 2504 can only one port can be used for management VLAN at a time ? I need all 4 ports to be untagged in the managment VLAN.
View 7 Replies View RelatedMy problem, in a nutshell, is that clients do not get an IP from an external DHCP server when connected to a guest VLAN.
My current setup is:
Native VLAN 1 (192.168.2.x)
2008 DHCP Servers
2504 WLC
[Code].....
The guest WLAN just uses WPA and a PSK and is set to interface vlan101 There rest of the 2504 config is default.
The ports that the WLC and APs are connected to are tagged on the correct VLANs. (is that even necessary for the AP now?)
Ive changed the interface config around a hundred times now with no luck. No matter what a client will not get an IP.
Could this be due to the 2504 and ASA both acting as DHCP relays? Ive tried setting the IP of the DHCP on the dynamic interface to many different things with no luck.
I was searching a lot , but I couldn't find any good example, how to configure DHCP server for our wireless clients on Cisco Autonomous AP. I'm looking for example how to configure Dot 11 radios and BVI interfaces.
I have no problem to configure DHCP server on BVI 1 and VLAN 1 ( native VLAN ) interfaces, but there is a problem with other BVI's and VLANs. Maybe this feature isn't supported? Maybe DHCP server feature is supported to work just with default BVI and native VLAN?
I created a wlan just for our wireless IP phones.I assigned an interface I created which in turn was set to a specific port on company 2504 WLC. Connecting switchport is set to trunk. Right now I can't ping the voice wlan interface.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?
View 18 Replies View RelatedHow do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See [URL])?
View 1 Replies View RelatedBetween our hosting and a customer we have an extended vlan, traveling on a fiber, between two cisco 3560 switches.The thing is, that we want to create one or more vlans inside that extended vlan, in some way if possible?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.10.50.0/24
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.20.50.0/24
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.
We have 6509 VSS with FWSM Module and we have created two context on it, one is INTERNALL CONTEXT othe is EXTERNALL Context? We have spanned various VLANS in switches and FWSM context level. All VLAN Gateways are configured in context level.
Activity description : We had planned migration of these devices into a new Datacenter, it was a planned activity. During migration of devices from one Dc to a new DC we broke the VSS and kept the primary running and removed the secondary switch and migrated this secondary to new DC and powered this device ON in the new DC and checked all the config was very much fine but this device was OFF network as secondary was brought to new DC just to limit the downtime during the primary switch movement.
During the activity ( Primary switch movement )We powered off the Primary switch and mean time before shifting into new Data center We had brought up secondary switch which was already existing in the DC was put live in the network and it was working fine without any issues.
Later we had moved Primary into new data center and tried to put into VSS with the secondary , during this period the secondary device into went into RECOVERY MODE and primary device was not responding and devices went off network and immediatly we removed the VSL link and brought up primary into production network without secondary online in the network ( Without VSS just stand alone switch ) network started working, but bringing up the primary we found that some of the VLANS in the FWSM was deleted and some VLAN had misconfiguration ( example : say original VLAN ip 10.200.112.1 has become 10.300.13.1 ) also some of the access list as well as SVI was deleted making configuration mismatch.
Wanted to know while syncronization b/n primary and secondary switch in VSS if we pull out VSL link would create this type of issues.
I have set up 2 DHCP pools and 2 VLANs (1 *the native* for data / 1 VLAN for voice). When I use the command "switchport voice vlan 20" the port disapear from the show vlan brief list. When I use the "switchport access vlan 20" it shows up in the show vlan brief in the correct VLAN and gives the phone an IP. I assume that using the access instead of the voice is wrong and the phones would not configure correctly. But when I use the access the phone goes to the next step and tells me the TFTP files are not found. Why does the port disapear from the VLAN list?
View 8 Replies View Relatedi need to solves this little problem on 2960S lan BASE but i dont know if it is possible.
Uplink port config for gi 1/0/28 is:
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk alloved vlan 10,11
but on interface gi 1/0/1 i want to have data from vlan 10 tagged as VLAN 20.
At this time i have solved this issue very primitively
I have set up gi 1/0/2 as int mode acces, acces vlan 20 and i have connected gi 1/0/2 with gi 1/0/3 with eth cable. int gi 1/0/3 is switchpor mode acces, switchport acces vlan 10
I have a 3750G switch in my production network that only has VLAN 1 on it. All ports are in a default state and VLAN 1 is disabled. The switch is passing traffic but shouldn't having the default VLAN shut down cause the ports not to pass traffic? If I start to create VLANs will that cause the switch to stop passing traffic?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm wanting to setup a Virtual Office scenario. Everything is working fine except for 802.1x...I can get the 881 to authenticate things connected to it, but I don't have the options of guest-vlan or auth-fail vlan.Idea is if the users takes the router home and someone, either accidentally or on pupose, connects an unauthorized Laptop, they stay off the Corp network but can get to the internet still.I found this link on Cisco's site: [URL]That link shows them configuring a guest vlan right on the fa0-3 ports of an 881W. I dont have that option on mine. I can only configure 802.1x on the vlan interface. I have 802.1x working, for things that connect to vlan1, but I would like to have a "fallback" setup.
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#int fa1
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot1?
dot1q
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot1
[code]....
I am trying to setup a L2tpv3 VLAN-to-VLAN tunnel.My setup has two Cisco 890 router with Cisco IOS Software version 15.0(1) M4. These routers are connected directly on FastEthernet port 8.
One linux machine is connected on FastEthernet port 0 on each router. The two linux machines are on same vlan. I am trying to establish a vlan-to-vlan tunnel between the routers and send traffic between the linux machines.
I followed the case study 11.4 from [URL] and configured the l2tp-class and pseudowire-class. However, the vlan interface configuration is different on 890 router.
I configured a vlan interface as follows.
(config)#vlan 200
(config)# interface FastEthernet 0
#shutdown
#switchport access vlan 200
(config)# interface vlan 200
I don't see the 'xconnect' command in this context. What's wrong with my configuration?
We have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
Client -> vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7 -> vlan 1 - ASA 5505 -> ISP
The Layer 2 Design:
Client -> Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43 -> Eth0/1 ASA5505 -> ISP
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:
switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:
One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue.
Here are the relevant config:
ASA Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
Client Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable
[code]...
i'm going mad on following problem. I'm trying to get 2 networks seeing each other while one of the network is a non VLAN network and the other one is a VLAN network.They should use the same interface so i added VLAN e0/0.122 to the interface e0/0.Send a ping from my asa to both gw-IP's made me happy at first. In second in figured out that i cannot reach any client in the other network. For testing purpose i created an permit acl to any/any for both networks, but the packets still get dropped by the default implicit rule. (deny any/anyMaybe i'm to stupid for this
View 10 Replies View RelatedI am trying to set up a Vlan on an SF-302-08 small business switch. I would like two Vlans both with internet access but the two cannot communicate with each other. I am not really sure how to go about setting this up as its all fairly new to me. I have successfully set up the Vlans and the ports on each VLAN cannot communicate with each other however the internet access will only work when plugged into either VLAN but wont work on both together
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've been given the task to clean-up our network config, and have walked into a disaster zone.We have a 4510R on site with everyone using the default VLAN, VLAN 1.I have created 4 new VLANS, VLAN100, VLAN150, VLAN200, VLAN250 I have assigned interface addresses to each VLAN and configured Inter VLAN routing.I can route to and from each new vlan with no problem, i.e VLAN250>VLAN100 VlAN100>VLAN200 etc but I can't route to VLAN 1(Default VLAN) from any of them, I can ping the interface on VLAN 1 from any VLAN , but any hosts are unreachable. On the flip side , from VLAN 1 I can route to all of the VLANS.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have some problem in my small network.I have 2 SF-300 48 port switches and connected to 847 router for intervlan routing. I configure 7 vlan in SW1 and uplink to SW2 with trunkport.
The problem is that if i used default gateway for users ip address of interface (vlan interface) is ok. I bring two adsl modem and connected to vlan1 and vlan2 for internet access. When i connected this two modem vlan 1 and vlan 2 are not going to access other vlan 3,4,5,6,7 and wise versa.
vlan1 users getting default gateway from adsl modem ip, how i can permit this two vlan should to access other vlan 3,4,5,6,7 and 3,4,5,6,7 should access to internet also.
[URL]...
I have a Netgear GSM7248R switch with 5 different Vlans including th management Vlan. Each of the vlans are connected to my layer 3 switch for routing. I want to access the management vlan form any of my Vlans so my layer two switch can be detected by my snmp manager.
View 3 Replies View RelatedIf the "GLC-SX-MM" is offical supported on "SPA-5X1GE-V2" ?My customer tested it and it seems to work but now i need an offical statement In the data sheet there is no entry of the requested SFP. url...
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 7206VXR with NPE-400. The IOS version is 12.4(24)T3. I installed a SA-VAM in the router in slot 6 but getting the following on the console.
AP-Pune-RT#Feb 23 11:16:34.484: %PA-3-NOTSUPPORTED: PA in slot6 (Unknown (type 650)) is not supported on this chassisFeb 23 11:16:34.484: %PA-3-DEACTIVATED: port adapter in bay [6] powered off.Feb 23 11:16:34.584: %PA-2-PABRIDGE: Failed to config bridge for PA 6Feb 23 11:16:35.384: %PA-4-IMPROPER_REMOVAL: Improper removal for slot 6.Feb 23 11:16:35.384: %PA-3-DEACTIVATED: port adapter in bay [6] powered off.Feb 23 11:16:35.468: %CRYPTO-4-PKT_REPLAY_ERR: decrypt: replay check failed connection id=975, sequence number=677864
Is the SA-VAM not supported in the Router 7206VXR?
I have an issue with Cisco 3560V2-24-PS which it indicates not supported in DFM. I can see the device working properly when I do snmpwalk and snmv3 test and device credential test. In fact I can see chassis view of this device.
IP Address = 10.10.1.60
DNS Name = DISTRI_SW02
Device Status = Unknown
Device Type = N/A
Aliases = N/A
Containments = N/A
But in LMS 3.2 supported device it indicates as supported. Current version of the switch is 12.2(58)SE2 which is higher than the minimum requirement 12.2(50)SE1. I tried to downgrade/upgrade IOS and still no luck.
As per information in the creent DFM (see below), it is supposedly supported 59.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1023Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24PS SwitchDFMDeviceUpdates19.0 Below is the current version of the LMS modules;
Products Installed Showing 1-9 of 9 records Product Name Version With Patch Level Installed Date 1.Campus Manager5.2.110 Oct 2012, 13:11:57 GMT+08:002.CiscoView6.1.910 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:003.CiscoWorks Assistant1.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:004.CiscoWorks Common Services3.3.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:005.Device Fault Manager3.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:006.Integration Utility1.9.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:53 GMT+08:007.Internetwork Performance Monitor4.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:53 GMT+08:008.LMS Portal1.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:53 GMT+08:009.Resource Manager Essentials4.3.110 Oct 2012, 13:17:50 GMT+08:00
Also my current device update.Showing 1-9 of 9 records Product Name Device Type Count 1.Campus Manager02.CiscoWorks Common Services03.CiscoView7614.CiscoWorks Assistant05.Device Fault Manager9366.Internetwork Performance Monitor07.LMS Portal08.Integration Utility09.Resource Manager Essentials812 I already downloaded all the patches online and all device updates were also updated.
There is support of devices not manufactured by cisco?For example satellite modems.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhich is the most stable, less processor intensive and VPN supported IOS for 2611xm. Currently I am using 12.4(15)T7 C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M. But this image is causing lot crashes. My router uptime never crossed 4 hrs. It is crashing very frequently. Any issue with this image in 2611."
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have one NAM 2204 upgraded to 5.1.2 version, but in Monitor - Traffic Summary - TOP N VLAN appears only VLAN 0, Why?
View 1 Replies View RelatedAfter upgrading to 7.2 on my 5508 WCS, the 1310 APs will no longer join. After a call to TAC they said the 1300 and 1400 APs are no longer supported on WCS. Is there any plan to add them back as supported in future releases?I was thinking I could downgrade my backup 5508 and change the APs to autonomous. Or is there some easier way to make them autonomous?
Also, as a low cost outdoor AP, I guess I am reduced to putting 1262s in a NEMA box with outdoor antennas. The 1552s are way too expensive for the quantity I need. Is there some other inexpensive outdoor AP that will replace 1300-1400 series?
Recently I purchased AIR-WLC2112-K9, but when I logged in I saw that system shows only 6 APs supported (I made print screen in addition). I'm running IOS v. 7.0.116.0 and I saw that there was some problems with earlier versions of IOS, but not this one.
View 5 Replies View Related