Which is the most stable, less processor intensive and VPN supported IOS for 2611xm. Currently I am using 12.4(15)T7 C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M. But this image is causing lot crashes. My router uptime never crossed 4 hrs. It is crashing very frequently. Any issue with this image in 2611."
I am having an issue with my Cisco VPN Client. I am new to VPN setup, so this is probably something easy I am missing. I have a 2611XM router acting as my internet gateway for my local lan, and my VPN Server. I am doing all my testing from a company laptop with a mobile broadband card. The VPN will connect, but anytime I ping anything within the inside network, it comes back with the public IP of the outside interface. I have NAT overload configured so everything on the inside network can access the internet, which it looks like might be causing my problem.
When i remove the nat overload on my fa0/1 interface, the vpn will connect to any resource on the inside.
I've set up a simple lab network of two cisco routers 2611XM and to each router I've attached a computer (host). I have set up a dhcp ip addresses for each host. I've set up a correct routing as well on each router. There are 3 networks: 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.3.0/24 The first network between the first host and first router, second is between two routers and third is between the second router and second host. If I use first host (192.168.1.20) I can ping to any ip address (192.168.1.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.2 (router 2), 192.168.3.1 (router 2)) except the second host ip address which is 192.168.3.20. When I sit on the second host (192.168.3.20) i can ping to 192.168.1.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.2 (router 2), 192.168.3.1 (router 2) but i can't ping to the first host which is 192.168.1.20. I've even tried with attaching a switch to a router and assign it an ip address of 192.168.1.3 and the ping was echoing to it.
I am in a test environment using an ASA 55005 and a Cisoc 2611xm router. ASA is running version 8.4 and router is running is ios12.4. My VPN tunnel comes up but I am unable to ping between remote hosts. I used the ASDM and SDM for the configuration. Attached is a copy of both configs.
I have a Cisco 2611XM (MPC860P) that i use at home, purchased it when i enrolled in my CCNA certification.
It never occured to me that i had an issue with this router. I have 10Mbps uplink at home, and sometimes its really slow, when i talked to my ISP, we did a lot of troubleshooting to see why we had high latency, but as it turns out, the issue is My Router.
I only have a few machines inside my local LAN so i never even thought this could happen. When i download a file using the 10Mb/s connection, the CPU load goes in less than 1 minute to 99%.
I thought it might be the IOS version of it, and upgraded it to a newer version, with the same results. Here is an output of it:
router1#show processes cpu sort CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/67%; one minute: 45%; five minutes: 13% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
If the "GLC-SX-MM" is offical supported on "SPA-5X1GE-V2" ?My customer tested it and it seems to work but now i need an offical statement In the data sheet there is no entry of the requested SFP. url...
I have a Cisco 7206VXR with NPE-400. The IOS version is 12.4(24)T3. I installed a SA-VAM in the router in slot 6 but getting the following on the console.
AP-Pune-RT#Feb 23 11:16:34.484: %PA-3-NOTSUPPORTED: PA in slot6 (Unknown (type 650)) is not supported on this chassisFeb 23 11:16:34.484: %PA-3-DEACTIVATED: port adapter in bay [6] powered off.Feb 23 11:16:34.584: %PA-2-PABRIDGE: Failed to config bridge for PA 6Feb 23 11:16:35.384: %PA-4-IMPROPER_REMOVAL: Improper removal for slot 6.Feb 23 11:16:35.384: %PA-3-DEACTIVATED: port adapter in bay [6] powered off.Feb 23 11:16:35.468: %CRYPTO-4-PKT_REPLAY_ERR: decrypt: replay check failed connection id=975, sequence number=677864
Is the SA-VAM not supported in the Router 7206VXR?
I have an issue with Cisco 3560V2-24-PS which it indicates not supported in DFM. I can see the device working properly when I do snmpwalk and snmv3 test and device credential test. In fact I can see chassis view of this device.
IP Address = 10.10.1.60 DNS Name = DISTRI_SW02 Device Status = Unknown Device Type = N/A Aliases = N/A Containments = N/A
But in LMS 3.2 supported device it indicates as supported. Current version of the switch is 12.2(58)SE2 which is higher than the minimum requirement 12.2(50)SE1. I tried to downgrade/upgrade IOS and still no luck.
As per information in the creent DFM (see below), it is supposedly supported 59.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1023Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24PS SwitchDFMDeviceUpdates19.0 Below is the current version of the LMS modules;
Products Installed Showing 1-9 of 9 records Product Name Version With Patch Level Installed Date 1.Campus Manager5.2.110 Oct 2012, 13:11:57 GMT+08:002.CiscoView6.1.910 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:003.CiscoWorks Assistant1.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:004.CiscoWorks Common Services3.3.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:005.Device Fault Manager3.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:52 GMT+08:006.Integration Utility1.9.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:53 GMT+08:007.Internetwork Performance Monitor4.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:53 GMT+08:008.LMS Portal1.2.010 Oct 2012, 11:27:53 GMT+08:009.Resource Manager Essentials4.3.110 Oct 2012, 13:17:50 GMT+08:00
Also my current device update.Showing 1-9 of 9 records Product Name Device Type Count 1.Campus Manager02.CiscoWorks Common Services03.CiscoView7614.CiscoWorks Assistant05.Device Fault Manager9366.Internetwork Performance Monitor07.LMS Portal08.Integration Utility09.Resource Manager Essentials812 I already downloaded all the patches online and all device updates were also updated.
After upgrading to 7.2 on my 5508 WCS, the 1310 APs will no longer join. After a call to TAC they said the 1300 and 1400 APs are no longer supported on WCS. Is there any plan to add them back as supported in future releases?I was thinking I could downgrade my backup 5508 and change the APs to autonomous. Or is there some easier way to make them autonomous?
Also, as a low cost outdoor AP, I guess I am reduced to putting 1262s in a NEMA box with outdoor antennas. The 1552s are way too expensive for the quantity I need. Is there some other inexpensive outdoor AP that will replace 1300-1400 series?
Recently I purchased AIR-WLC2112-K9, but when I logged in I saw that system shows only 6 APs supported (I made print screen in addition). I'm running IOS v. 7.0.116.0 and I saw that there was some problems with earlier versions of IOS, but not this one.
we just purchased 2 asa 5585-40's and tried to add them to our lms 3.2 system and we were informed by cisco tac that they were not supported in lms 3.2. since we don't having funding for an upgrade, any work around within lms that could allow me to add the devices so i can use lms for syslog and to fetch the firewall configs on a regular basis, instead of having to setup a seperate syslog server and having to tftp the config's everytime i make a change.
Service policy output command is not supporting on Vlan interface of Cisco 2900 Router.I am having one HWic 4ESW Card and configured VLAN interface. But Service policy output command is not supporting.Same config is supporting in the Cisco 2800 Router.
I have a pair of physical ASR 1002 routers, called ASR-1 and ASR-2. I setup HSRP on both ASR-1 and ASR-2 on both g0/0/0 and g0/0/1 interfaces, nothing complicated, just straight forward HSRP.
Now Cisco TAC told me that HSRP is NOT supported between physical ASR routers. WTF!
Furthermore, they told me that HSRP only supported within a single ASR because of multiple routed processors. In other words, you can setup HSRP with a single physical ASR but not with two physical ASR routers.
HSRP can not supported with two physical ASR routers?
I have checked on Cisco.com and as per a module support document for ISR's G2, the NM-1CE1TI-PRI module is not supported on new ISR's. Grateful if more clarification could be obtained about the above.
Will be router not detect the module when inserted in the chassis?
My problem with ASR 1006 as i tried to use the feature IRB ( integrated routing and bridging ) but i find that this feature is not supported i assume it may be a problem with IOS version or may be i made he configuration not in the proper way
so i am asking to try this feature on ASR 1000 series and work with it as I test this feature on other routers and it work just fine.
Can a 2504 wlc use a vlan ids of 190X? I have found that it supports 512 vlans but I have not found any restrictions in the id used.Vlan id 190X is distributed by the isp (they have the ASAs in their central site) so if it is not supported I must prepare a vlan transfer between switches.
I have a 6509 and a 6506- same IOS version and flavor, same hardware, etc. One supports rate limiting on the VLAN interfaces, the 6509 says "not supported due to hardware". What is the difference here? Im very confused on this since I was under the impression the chassis were the same- just in size.
Is 'mls qos' supported on Cisco 877? I want to implement bandwidth limiting on a specific IP using access-lists on a class-map.If yes, what version and software do I need (ip base, adv security, etc)?
working through a lab and can't seem to configure frame relay on subints. I assume it's not supported but this seems basic; am I doing something wrong?
Why does my 3750x-12s switch say it's not supported in CNA??? I upgraded to CNA 5.7.1 and still says unsupported. This device is supported or I'm just missing something.I use CNA heavily to manage our MANY vlans.
This is a feature that I have researched for by looking at ISRs G2 data sheets and cisco.com website.The number of users that can be supported or the recommended number of users per router chassis/model is not mentioned anywhere.However this is mentioned in the Cisco 880 ISR data sheet. What are the number of users that can be supported or the recommended number of users on Cisco 1900/2900/3900 ISRs?
We are trying to migrate from 1g to 10G, couldn't find any module on 6509-E which supports 10G on SFP+ ...I can see X2 and Xenpacks .. but not SFP + .what exactly this Xenpack means ?
On googling I came across documents that say OTV (Overlay Transport Virtualization) is supported on Cat 6500. Any authentic information whether OTV is supported on Cat 6500, especially with Sup-720B? FYI, Cisco Feature Navigator does not mention it.
We are planning to configure the ipv6 PBR on our 7606 routers. We have configured the route-maps successfully .but when we tried to apply those on interfaces we are facing an problem .
when we trying to give command # ipv6 policy route-map <route map name> . we are unable to find policy command option in the command list.
IOS Version : c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE3.bin.
I have a question about VSS support. Is Cat4506E(Sup7E) supported in VSS mode? Any requirement and doc related to Cat4506E in VSS mode for the references?