Cisco Switching/Routing :: 857w IP Cannot Ping Device
Jun 27, 2012
I have a spare Cisco 857w that I am playing around with to learn.I managed to reset it to default, upgrade the ios to 12.4 However for the llife of me I cannot ping this device.
I cannot ping and end node on my system from my Cisco 2911. I've tried to configure my computer to ping the device and I am able to. It seems the difference between using my computer and the 2911 is that with my computer I am able to set the default gateway as the end node's ip.
i have a device connected to 2960 switch. It is an access port and i could ping the device from other switches , also from outside the lan. But i am not able to ping the device from 2960 switch alone. I suspected and checked the arp table and it was showing as incomplete. I created the manual arp entry and tried pinging but no luck.
I need to replace an ADSL modem and have a spare 857W. Can I use this to act as a simple bridge between the ADSL PPPoA connection and the FW WAN port?
[ CISCO 857W ] ISP - PPPoA - BRIDGE - FW WAN
I have a block of Public IP's so the PPPoA Dialer 0 connection would get x.x.x.185/29 I would like to bridge this directly to the FW WAN port and set that to x.x.x.185/29 with a gateway of x.x.x.186/32.Currently I am using it in router mode with no NAT or FW and am losing a Public IP as I need to set the FW WAN as x.x.x.186 with a GW of x.x.x.185 I am setting BVI 1 as x.x.x.185/29 and Dialer0 as IP Unnumbered BVI 1.
I am missing something and i dont no what but i am trying to ping a pc on the same network but get a destination host is unreachable. Can any one think of anything that could be causing this, i can ping the default gateway and internet address's?
my trouble is I have a cisco 857w and I have never configured a wireless config for a cisco router before. Ok so i have had a go through the web interface (i know, last resort) and still no joy
Basically what im looking for is to have a visible (broadcast ssid) network with a password (WEP/WPA/WPA2, not picky) and it to be joined to the same vlan as the ethernet ports (VLAN 1).
I have an issue with a Cisco 857w. When I connect on via SDM I get a message saying "SDM has detected enabled debugs on the router. Because debugs degrade the performance of the router and of SDM, it is recommended that they be disabled". I've connected onto the router via telnet and ran the show debug command which indicates that dot11 debugging is on and when I run the command no debugging all it turns it off. I then do a copy run start and reboot the router and it comes back on. how I permanently disable it?
I'm trying to view the logs from a Cisco 857W router to a workstation running the Kiwi Syslog server. what I've done is the following:
Config term
Logging on
Logging source-interface BVI1
Logging Facility Local7 (or any other facility you want to allocate for this router.)
Logging [IP Address or Hostname of machine running Kiwi Syslog Server]
End
I see noting on the syslog server. Although I can see the log information on the router Also is there a command to stop the logging from generating or is this on by default.
I have a new 3560G to set up a small network for a remote site. I configured the vlan and an SVI as the gateway. The switch is also the DHCP server for the LAN. I configured Gi0/2 as L3 port, connecting to the nearest neighbor. My network runs EIGRP so i advertised the routes into the EIGRP process. The switch forms EIGRP neighbors and learns all routes in the enterprise network. The problems I'm having now are: 1. The switch learns all routes in my enterprise LAN and can ping devices in the enterprise LAN, but I can’t ping any interface on the switch from the enterprise LAN. 2.
I set this up and I can ping all the gateways but never the hosts. I was hoping I could make these links between 6500's a mix of L2 and L3. Check it out. They are connected in a linear fashion R1--->R2--->R3. I can ping from R1 to R3's SVI4 gateway but I can never ping a host on that SVI4. I was hoping that I could use the port-channels between 6500's as routed links or as trunk links depending on the type of traffic....thought it would ease the migration. I suppose I could always get rid of the port-channels and just make separate L2 and L3 links between the 6500's.
From My Router that connects to Cable modem i am unable to ping website 4.2.2.2I am able to ping all other websites fines.Same website i can ping from my pc and all other switches fine.Router has only 1 ACL thats for NAT.
I have a 3560E with 2 vlans that I want to route between. one device with 2 vlans and route between.Interfaces are configured as such:
int g0/11 switchport mode access switchport access vlan 10 int g0/12 switchport mode access switchport access vlan 11
[code]...
Laptops on each port with 10.10.10.2 and 10.10.11.2 configured on them. I can ping from 10.10.10.2 to 10.10.11.1, but not to 10.10.11.2.What do I have to configure to be able to get the 2 laptops to talk to each other?
I have a new 5505 that im trying to upgrade the IOS on. The 5505 and the laptop are connected via a 5 port switch.From the laptop i can ping the inside interface of the 5505, but i cannot ping the laptop from the 5505. As a result, my TFTP is failing.
I have interited an ASA5505 problem. We're trying to manage the ASA remotely - we can connect to the device remotely via IPSec, we can ping other devices on the LAN network, but cannot ping the inside interface of the ASA - nor can we telnet/ssh/http to it. We can, however, connect to another router that's on the LAN and then SSH into the ASA's inside interface.
My IP via VPN: 10.133.20.8 The ASA interface we're trying to connect to via SSH or ASDM: 10.4.209.254 A router on the LAN we can connect to 10.4.209.250
We can ping other LAN devices such as 10.4.209.75, .90, .150 - so it's not a NAT/Route/Split Tunnel issue.I've attached the ASA config.
I'm new to this cisco 5505 and I want to carry out a task as simple as a remote access VPN, in my case I did the wizard, with time on my test, I could connect to the VPN, but I can not ping any device internal network. [code]
I just found out that one of our 10 3750's has been assigned with an IP Address that is in conflict with a PC that has been in production long before this 3750 was deployed in our environment. Good thing it is servicing devices on a separate vlan. The conflict IP Address is assigned to the default vlan of the switch so we can connect to it from the core.If I change the IP Address of the switch, will it reboot and momentarily disconnect the devices connected to it?
I have a /28 subnet between my internal and external firewalls for L3 connectivity. On our internal firewall, I have a default route for internet traffic pointing to the external firewall (10.10.1.2).
We will be inserting a web filter appliance as indicated on the diagram. The appliance requires an IP address to be assigned to the LAN interface.
What is the best way to accomplish this with minimal impact? Will my default route on my internal firewall have to change to the IP of the web appliance if I address the web appliance on the 10.10.1.x subnet?Should I address the web appliance on the 10.10.1.x subnet to begin with, or create a vlan on the 2960 and a L2 interface on one of the firewalls?
[code] I can not ping IP 192.168.1.1 from SWH02. I observed there sth wrong when trunking over SDH. Because when I config int vlan 121 on another switch(SWH04) already trunking with SWH01, I can ping IP 192.168.1.1 from SWH04.
I could not ping 8.8.8.8 and access internet after creating the VPN. Below is my setup and router configuration: [code] From the router 1941, i could ping up to 58.185.149.141 but not up to 58.185.149.140. Since i cannot ping 58.185.149.140, i suppose i cannot ping 8.8.8.8. I am sure 58.185.185.140 is there as i use another PC which is connected directed to the office network instead of through the router 1941, it could ping 58.185.149.140.For your info, the g0/1/0 is connected to the PC while g0/1 is connected to the office network.
My FastEthernet 0/0 interface uses DHCP and got 172.16.2.126 /16. My Ethernet 0/0 interface is my internal interface, it has static 192.168.0.1 /24. On the Ethernet 0/0 interface, I have a PC attached, IP 192.168.0.150 /24.
The router's gateway is set to IP 172.16.1.1
My PC can ping 192.168.0.1 and can ping 172.16.2.126 (both interfaces of my router). My router can ping anywhere on the Internet. But my PC cannot ping 172.16.1.1. Firewall disabled, all security disabled.
I have a cisco 3825 router with two GE interfaces. GE0/0 is connected to a switch through ethernet cable. I have configured the GE0/0 interface with IP address. I have also configured static route for the local network. However, now I can only ping the GE0/0's own IP from the router. Here are the running-config:
hostname Router ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! !card type command needed for slot 2 enable secret 5 $1$4gxa$sykc0mcaxpCIrGc86i1ZE.
[code]...
The 10.1.52.1 is the current gateway on the 10.1.52.x LAN.
I was trying to add an Access Rule then Nat rule, they applied ok then i lost connection to my ASA 5510.I cant ping device ip, i cant connect via console , only can acess via Management port, i have pasted Running config. [code]
I have one specific trouble with Catalyst 3560CG switch and Stardom reserved industrial controller. Controller has 2 processors, one of them after(!) negotiation become main with IP 192.168.1.1, other one stays in reserve with IP 192.168.1.129. If main one shuts down, spare one becomes main with IP 192.168.1.1. This perfectly works with DLINK and MOXA level 2 switches, but fails with Catalyst 3560, because spare one cannot even connect to switch port. I don't know the exact reason of it, but i suspect, that it happens because of before negotiation both controllers have ip 192.168.1.1 (i know, that it is wrong and weird, but so it goes). First of them correctly connects to switch port, which goes up and passes pings. Second processor tries to connect to switch port, which goes several times up and very soon down, then processor lefts his tries to connect to anybody and become idle. The switch seems to some way check IPs of 1-st and 2-nd port packets, and shuts down 2-nd port. I have connected via hyperterminal and tried to disable some level 3 functions and checks of the switch, but this wasn't useful. how exactly(or at least approximately) should i configure a switch to make this bundle work?
I'm finding information about the RFC 2544 latency of the IE3000 device.Does it exist a document containg latency value measured in relation to packet dimension?
I have a 2811 ISR, a lab unit with almost nothing yet configured other than some IP networks on serial and FE interfaces to ping to other lab routers. And I have one HWIC-4ESW installed, and I amrunning IOS 15.2.I want to set the card as a single routable interface and just have the ports act like switch ports, which I imagine is the default design of these cardsI work a lot with Cisco 891 ISRs so figured it's the same here, assign an IP to interface Vlan1 and all is well. That was wrong, obviously more config is required.It seems there are a lot of differing answers out there, so far none what worked for me. The best looking one I could find said to assign an IP to the Vlan 1 interface, then go to each of the four FE interfaces on the switch module.
I am trying to test the MTU between two 3750 switches I have in the lab. I've set the MTU with the command "system mtu 9000" on both switches and rebooted.
The only connections on the switches are the gig ports connecting the two switches. Each interface is a member of vlan 1.
I am doing an extended ping. I set the datagram size to 2000. When the df bit is set the ping doesn't go through. If the DF bit is not set the ping goes through.
The debug ip icmp shows, 4d00h: ICMP: dst (1.1.1.1): frag. needed and DF set.
Why is fragmentation needed when the MTU is set to 9000?
GigabitEthernet1/0/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0015.2b7d.0d01 (bia 0015.2b7d.0d01) MTU 9000 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
I have 2 routers, one is an Apple AirPort Extreme with a static outside IP address, I also have a Cisco 871 with a static outside IP address. The Airport Extreme connects to a switch on the private network and has an IP address ending in .1. The Cisco 871 connects to the same Private network and it ends in .2. The 871 is setup as a VPN Server. now when clients connect to the VPN they can ping the VLan IP Address on the 871, but they can t ping any other hosts on the smae network. The hosts on the private network can ping the vlan on the 871.
1)Configured 3550 as layer 3 switch and create a default route to 192.168.2.254
2) Configured 2 static routes(for 2 vlan range traffic) and one default route to 192.168.3.254
3) ip pass through is not configured yet, still the public ip is configured at the isp router
1811 static route configs ------------------------------------ Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.254 Ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 Ip route 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 3550 static route config -------------------------------------- Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.254
Testing results 1)All lan communications are working fine(inter vlan also), ping to all servers from router is getting and ping to outside public ips are getting from router,but not getting ping from switch 3550 to 192.168.3.254 and any of the public ips(internet).
I am connecting a 2600 router to an ISP. Interface 0/0 is connected to the ISP using DHCP. Interface 0/1 is connected to the inside providing DHCP services to the inside. At least it should only be providing DHCP services to the inside. I also have a public static IP that is NAT to a private static IP. Everything is working except the computer on the static IP. From the router I am able to ping inside and out from each interface. I am able to ping both interfaces of the router from the computer on the static IP but I cannot ping outside the router. If I do a debug all I see a reject for the gateway of the static IP but it has “mobile IP” in the text string. Not sure what mobile IP is relating to. Networks are as follows:
0/0 DHCP 10.X.X.X 0/1 192x.x.x Static 75.X.X.X no ip dhcp use vrf connected ip dhcp excluded-address 192.X.X.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.X.X.2 ip dhcp pool CLIENT
I have several cabinets with top-of-rack N2K's attached to N5K's via FEX's. 9 cabinets with 2 switches each.
Recently I added 3 more cabinets to the mix, for a total of 12 cabinets with 2 switches each.
I can get into the new switches and see the FEX's and configure ports, etc. but no device I attach to the 'new' N2K's is pingable over the network. I can take the same device, same cable, and attach it to a legacy N2K talking to the same N5K's, and it immediately joins and is pingable over the network