We have several of these WS-C2960S-24PS-L running 12.2(55)SE5 C2960S-universalK9-M and need to upgrade to a better.IOS since we have a sitution where CPU would get to 100% but we have only a few ports connected.Also we have several of WS-C3750-48P running 12.2(55) SE6 C3750-IPBASEK9-M.
View 3 RepliesThe pinout of poe and poe+ (802.3af) and (803.3at) of these models of Cisco switches?
WS-C2960S-48FPS-L 48 Ethernet 10/100/1000 PoE+ ports; 740W PoE capacityWS-C2960S-48LPS-L 48 Ethernet 10/100/1000 PoE+ ports; 370W PoE capacityWS-C3750-48PS-S 48 Ethernet 10/100 ports with IEEE 802.3af and Cisco prestandard Power
Pin goes where the power for Poe (802.3af) and poe+ (802.3at) for this model Cisco
I have a got a requirement where a 24 Port Switch should have 4 SFP's and all 4 should be used at a time, So I've chosen " WS-C2960S-24TS-L"
The transeiver should be GLC-LH-SM, so kindly let me no whether I would be able to use all 4 ports at a time or not.
I have configured about 20 of these switches now, and notice in the port listings a TE1/1//1 TE1/1/2 and GI1/1/1 GI1/1/2 uplink port. There are only two uplink SFP+ ports. I now have a reason to install with a 1Gb uplink to the Core. I am using a GLC-LH module at each end. I did configure the TE1/1/1 port for the uplink. Does not work though..Do I need to configure the two GI1/1/1 and 1/1/2 ports for uplink, remove the TE configuration for the uplink to work? Using the UNIVERSAL code with a LANBase license.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAfter insertion of SFP module in the Switch i have messages bellow and the switch hangs after couple of minutes it restarts
[Code]....
Does GLC-GE-100FX is supported on the WS-C2960S-24TD-L. I don't see this switch listed under the compatibiilty matrix.URL,But the datasheet for the 2960S says this:"The Cisco Catalyst 2960-S with SFP+ does not support the GLC-FE-100BX, GLC-FE-100FX, or GLC-FE-100LX."But it provides no reference for the GLC-GE-100FX,The easy answer is, no the 2960S-24TD doesn't support it.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco WS-C2960S-48TD-L with 12.2(55)SE2.This is a standalone switch, not in stack, and with no order it reboots itself looking for a new master election. On logging i have nothing, but connected with console cable i see the following after 2 minutes of not showing anything:
Waiting for Stack Master Election...
...
The switch reboots and:
...
*Mar 1 00:00:12.289: Read env variable - LICENSE_BOOT_LEVEL =
[URL]
After searching online i have no seeing nothing about disable the feature of the stack so i configure the priority for the "switch 1" to 15 and configure it the switches 2, 3 and 4 to no provision, although this switches don´t exist:
SW_ACCESS(config)#switch 1 priority 15
Changing the Switch Priority of Switch Number 1 to 15
Do you want to continue?[confirm]
New Priority has been set successfully
[URL]
With this new configuration the switch has rebooted again.Why on a standalone switch the stack is rebooting my system?Is it any feature to disable the stack?
We have the following stack configuration:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image------ ----- ----- ---------- ---------- 1 28 WS-C2960S-24TS-L 12.2(55)SE3 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M 2 28 WS-C2960S-24TS-L 12.2(55)SE3 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M 3 52 WS-C2960S-48TS-L 12.2(55)SE5 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M * 4 52 WS-C2960S-48TS-L 12.2(55)SE5 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
We have existing stack of 3 units of WS-C3750-48TS-S ( 100 mbps ports with Gigabot uplinks). with IOS as follows, Can we add WS-C3750G-48PS-S in this same stack (this is 48 Gigabit ports)?
View 2 Replies View Relateda) I have three C3750-X switch stack together as my SAN switch and running on the new 15.0 release which is 15.0(1) SE.
b) Recently the master switch rebooted without any explanation. Create ticket with TAC and got an answer that it is due to a bug with ID: CSCtr31957.
My question is, which release that should i choose either the 15.0(1) SE3 or the latest 15.0(2)? Will it affect any of my configuration if i change to 15.0(2)?
Finally, what is the best practice to upgrade IOS in a stack whether to upgrade it 1 switch at a time or do it to all at once?
Our client having one c3750 with ipbase license switch.They are connected server and end switches to that switch.Our customer want to increase the speed to accessing the server at that time I am told to use etherchannel.Customer happy about this and implement the etherchannel configuration.Now i need to configure etherchannel upto 4 physical link.server are connected on port no Ge1/0/10,they want to bind four phical link GE1/0/10-13.how to configure etherchannel in this switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there a way I can downgrade the firmware on a C3750 v2 switch 24TS-S v07 to 12.2(35) SE5. I have added this new switch to an existing stack but the FW is not compatable. I believe the answer is to upgrade the rest but I cannot afford any down time as they are used to run a CCTV securiy network 24/7. I have included details below to assist with my problem. Switch 4 is the one with a version miss match.
LNB-SWI3750-CTR-01#show verCisco IOS Software, C3750 Software (C3750-IPBASE-M), Version 12.2(35)SE5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Copyright (c) 1986-2007 by Cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Thu 19-Jul-07 19:15 by nachenImage text-base: 0x00003000, data-base: 0x01080000
ROM: Bootstrap program is C3750 boot loaderBOOTLDR: C3750 Boot Loader (C3750-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(25r)SEE4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
LNB-SWI3750-CTR-01 uptime is 19 weeks, 3 days, 22 hours, 46 minutesSystem returned to ROM by power-onSystem image file is "flash:c3750-ipbase-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipbase-
[code]....
I want to connect WS-C2960S-48TD-L switch to WS-X6708-10G-3CXL module in Cisco WS-C6503-E switch. WS-X6708-10G-3CXL is C6K 8 port 10 Gigabit Ethernet module with DFC3CXL which requires X2 module. on the otherhand, WS-C2960S-48TD-L requires SFP+. Now is it possible to interconnect these two switch interfaces if I use LIU in between. or does WS-X6708-10G-3CXL module supports CVR-X2-SFP+ to use SFP+ transceivers.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhy I cannot ping vlan when no port connect to switch.
View 3 Replies View RelatedAfter powering up a WS-C3750-48PS switch, Normal POST LED flashing of lights does not happen, instead the switch is stuck in SYST Mode on the front panel. My attempt to hold down the mode button upon powering up for 15 sec fails to reboot the switch. I cannot console to the switch. Is this switch unrecoverable? Should I RMA with TAC?
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs there an official Cisco-Page with the always-up-to-date recommended NX-OS-Releases for the Nexus 5000, just as there is URL
If there is no such page: What Release can be recommended?
We got new N596 & N2232 this week, and are using L2-LAN only, no L3,no FCoE- or FC-Ports. The command 'vPC orphan-ports suspend' is the newest feature used, so 5.0(3)N2(1) would be the oldest possible release.
Before I install 5.1(3)N1(1a) and then have to do a distruptive downgrade to 5.0(3)N2(2b), I'd like to be assured that the new one is already recommended as mature enough.
I am currently trying to setup a GRE tunnel on a cisco 861. As part of a configuration template provide by an outside source I am recommended to use a sub-interface on the router but the recommended configuration does not work.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 8 switches (different models) configured in stack:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image------ ----- ----- ---------- ---------- 1 28 WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2(55)SE C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M 2 26 WS-C3750-24P 12.2(55)SE C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M 3 30 WS-C3750X-24P 12.2(55)SE C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M 4 30 WS-C3750X-24P 12.2(55)SE C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M* 5 12 WS-C3750G-12S 12.2(55)SE C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M 6 30 WS-C3750E-24PD 12.2(55)SE C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M 7 30 WS-C3750E-24PD 12.2(55)SE C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M 8 30 WS-C3750X-24P 12.2(55)SE C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M
Now I'm have IOS ver. 12.2(55)SE but from time to time I'm experiencing strange system freezing. It means that all systems connected to the stack are working very, very slow. It hapens ones, sometimes twice a month and takes 5 minutes. I didn't find anything strange in logs (neither on switch nor router). I would like to install other IOS version. Could you recomend me the most stable version for this stack (built from these different models) ?And the secound question: - Is it possible to copy SE1 manualy to every switch and reload one by one manualy. Will they join the stack and work fine after reload or maybe there will be a IOS mismatch ?
I just upgraded several of my C2960S-48FPD-L from 12.2(55)SE to 12.2(58)SE and now almost every time I try to SSH to it the switch reboots and gives me these trace backs ...
07:58:52 CST Thu Apr 14 2011: Unexpected exception to CPU vector 200, PC = 1EADA28
-Trace back= 0x1EADA28z 0x1CDC324z 0x1EA5520z 0x1CDC35Cz 0x1CDD0E0z 0x1CDF0C4z 0x1CE06CCz 0x1CE07F8z 0x1D67348z 0x1D611BCz
Writing crash info to flash:/crashinfo_ext/crashinfo_ext_3
07:58:56 CST Thu Apr 14 2011: Unexpected exception to CPU vector 1100, PC = 121BB98
-Trace back= 0x121BB98z 0x12250FCz 0xFA7540z 0xA807B8z 0xA75DF4z 0xA78080z 0x94B708z 0x9717C0z 0x918DD8z 0x936520z 0x9344BCz 0x9345FCz 0x93484Cz 0x1D67348z 0x1D611BCz
=== Flushing messages (07:58:56 CST Thu Apr 14 2011) ===
Buffered messages: (last 4096 bytes only)
0x00000005 R6 = 0x01224F44 R7 = 0x02A23C6C
000089: *Feb 28 18:03:13.577 CST: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: R8 = 0x00000080 R9 = 0x00000000 R10 = 0x00000000 R11 = 0x00000071
000090: *Feb 28 18:03:13.577 CST: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: R12 = 0x00034855 R13 = 0x00000280 R14 = 0x01CE0778 R15 = 0x00000000
000091: *Feb 28 18:03:13.577 CST: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: R16 = 0x00000000 R17 = 0x00000000 R18 = 0x00000000 R19 = 0x00000000
[ code]....
I am looking for a reasonable switch but it has do do inter-VLAN Routing. I know I could go with a 3560/3750 with IP Services but I am also thinking the 2960S with IP Base IOS might do?
I have looked up the IP Base IOS and it does list IP Routing but how to actually configure inter-VLAN Routing on a 2960S with IP Base?
I have been trying to enable L3 intervlan routing on C2960S Switch with ip routing command and that was the output from the Switch: [code]
View 6 Replies View RelatedIs there a CLI-command to see the serial number of the flexstack module installed in a C2960S.
View 13 Replies View RelatedWe have a 2960 stack of 4 WS-C2960S-24PS-L switches.Sometimes, at random, the stack crashes and reboots. I have downloaded the crashinfo file and can see the following error.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure a stack between two WS-C2960S-48FPS-L but does not working.The switch port is always Down.I tried to change de module and cables.I tried to make a loop in one of two switches and the ports always down.
IOS: 12.2(55)SE5
#show switch stack-ports
Switch # Port 1 Port 2
-------- ------ ------
1 Down Down
We have two switches WS-C2960S-24TS-L running in stack with running IOS c2960s-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.We have connected two checkpoint devices on Gi1/0/24 and Gi2/0/24 with a simple configuration:
interface range GigabitEthernet1/0/24, gi2/0/24
switchport access vlan x
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
On the devices log we get the following message:
%SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host 0000.0000.fe21 in vlan x is flapping between port Gi2/0/24 and port Gi1/0/24
The mac-address 0000.0000.fe21 is not found on any checkpoint interface. "Show mac-address int gi1/0/24 or gi2/0/24" does not show the correct mac-address of the checkpoint interface connected to the port, but instead shows 0000.0000.fe21.Is there a bug in the IOS, something wrong with the switch config or does it have something to do with the checkpoint config?
I have a customer with a stack of two switches C2960S-24TS-L that are running 12.2(58)SE2 universal K9, we see that the CPU load increase over time, to 95% and stays there reload solves the problem.the process that akes a lot of CPU is also the SNMP ENGINE, I see that it is running 30 minutes on 95% and then 10 minutes on 35%, this is the only stack were we see this problem. Is there also a SNMP bug in this version ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes GLC-GE-100FX is supported on the WS-C2960S-24TD-L. I don't see this switch listed under the compatibility matrix.URL
But the datasheet for the 2960S says this:
"The Cisco Catalyst 2960-S with SFP+ does not support the GLC-FE-100BX, GLC-FE-100FX, or GLC-FE-100LX." But it provides no reference for the GLC-GE-100FX The easy answer is, no the 2960S-24TD doesn't support it, any clarification if possible.
is it possible to connect UCS FI directly to C2960S using Twin Ax Cable (3M long) ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a very simple setup containing 3 C2960S switches:switch 1: central switch, acting as router between VLAN 1 en VLAN 2switch 2+3: edge switches, connected via 1 link to central switch, both on VLAN 2,Clients connect to switch 2 and 3 using dhcp, switch 1 uses dhcp relay to forward requests from VLAN 2 to the dhcp server on VLAN 1. So far so good.Now I want switch 1 to add option 82 to the dhcp requests so the dhcp server can see whether the request came through switch 2 or switch 3. I tried turning on dhcp option 82 support on switch 1 by doing.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWS-C2960S-24PD-LCatalyst 2960S 24 GigE PoE 370W, 2 x 10G SFP+ LAN Base
Can I use the above said switch for 1 Gig Uplinks using SFP.
I have three new 2960 switches as listed in the title. I configured them as follows:
192.168.1.215 host: whse-c
192.168.1.216 host: whse-b
192.168.1.217 host: whse-a
Switches B and C flow into A before continuing on into the server room switch (distance issues).All three switches are configured for ports 21-24 at 1000 and set as cisco switches. all other ports are undefined as they have a myriad of desktops, printers and non cisco access points flowing into them. side question - should i configure them as access points where applicable even if they are non cisco? I am replacing three netgear switches that currently are in place and have no known issues other than they are old and the fans may fail soon.hooked up .217. was able to get to it from the network. Hooked up 215 and then 216. All the sudden I lost the ability to tap into the switches, any of them. (I think I had done 215 at that point too, before adding 216. I found out later it took the network to its knees as internet was lost, and the MPLS stopped functioning.
I undid the changes and put the netgears back in service and all was right with the world again. At first I thought it was a bad host name as I had used whse-a on switch C in error. I changed that after this issue.Later that day I put 215 in place. checked it from the network and could get to it just fine. Then I put 216 in service. I lost connection to 215. I could no longer get to the internet from my pc and the MPLS went down again. This time I just unhooked 216. 215 is still in place and working on the network at the moment and not causing issues. (btw these switches are not even in my path from my pc to the internet, just on the same network) tomorrow I am going to try 217 again while 215 is still on the network and see if there are any issues adding that swtich. if I can do so, and there are no problems, is this an indication of a faulty switch? what further testing can I do, have I missed something in setup? If this brings the network down again, why cant i add two of these switches to each other/on the same network path (B and C were not even connected to each other yesterday evening when it went down again).
I was looking at WS-C2960S-48FPS-L (740 Watts) and WS-C2960S-48LPS-L (340 Watts) models today, I'm not sure that I understand it right,
Does WS-C2960S-48FPS-L model support all 48 ports POE+ (30Watts)? Does that mean each port will get 30 Watts on this switch?
Does model WS-C2960S-48LPS-L support 24 ports with POE and 24 ports with POE+?.
How many Switches can be stacked with WS-C2960S-48FPD-L at a max..
As per my Knowledge it is 4 and as below..
Switch 1 to Switch 2
Switch 2 to Switch 3
Switch 3 to Switch 4
Switch 4 to Switch 1
If yes then, is it mandatory to do the "Switch 4 to Switch 1" stack. why am I asking this is because this stack requires a long cable and the cable which comes with the Switch is only 0.5M.