Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C2960S-48FPS-L / Pinount Poe (802.3af) And Poe+ (802.3at) For Switch?
Feb 12, 2012
The pinout of poe and poe+ (802.3af) and (803.3at) of these models of Cisco switches?
WS-C2960S-48FPS-L 48 Ethernet 10/100/1000 PoE+ ports; 740W PoE capacityWS-C2960S-48LPS-L 48 Ethernet 10/100/1000 PoE+ ports; 370W PoE capacityWS-C3750-48PS-S 48 Ethernet 10/100 ports with IEEE 802.3af and Cisco prestandard Power
Pin goes where the power for Poe (802.3af) and poe+ (802.3at) for this model Cisco
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 14, 2013
I'm trying to configure a stack between two WS-C2960S-48FPS-L but does not working.The switch port is always Down.I tried to change de module and cables.I tried to make a loop in one of two switches and the ports always down.
IOS: 12.2(55)SE5
#show switch stack-ports
Switch # Port 1 Port 2
-------- ------ ------
1 Down Down
View 15 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2012
I was looking at WS-C2960S-48FPS-L (740 Watts) and WS-C2960S-48LPS-L (340 Watts) models today, I'm not sure that I understand it right,
Does WS-C2960S-48FPS-L model support all 48 ports POE+ (30Watts)? Does that mean each port will get 30 Watts on this switch?
Does model WS-C2960S-48LPS-L support 24 ports with POE and 24 ports with POE+?.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2013
We have several of these WS-C2960S-24PS-L running 12.2(55)SE5 C2960S-universalK9-M and need to upgrade to a better.IOS since we have a sitution where CPU would get to 100% but we have only a few ports connected.Also we have several of WS-C3750-48P running 12.2(55) SE6 C3750-IPBASEK9-M.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
I have a got a requirement where a 24 Port Switch should have 4 SFP's and all 4 should be used at a time, So I've chosen " WS-C2960S-24TS-L"
The transeiver should be GLC-LH-SM, so kindly let me no whether I would be able to use all 4 ports at a time or not.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
I have configured about 20 of these switches now, and notice in the port listings a TE1/1//1 TE1/1/2 and GI1/1/1 GI1/1/2 uplink port. There are only two uplink SFP+ ports. I now have a reason to install with a 1Gb uplink to the Core. I am using a GLC-LH module at each end. I did configure the TE1/1/1 port for the uplink. Does not work though..Do I need to configure the two GI1/1/1 and 1/1/2 ports for uplink, remove the TE configuration for the uplink to work? Using the UNIVERSAL code with a LANBase license.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2013
After insertion of SFP module in the Switch i have messages bellow and the switch hangs after couple of minutes it restarts
[Code]....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2010
Does GLC-GE-100FX is supported on the WS-C2960S-24TD-L. I don't see this switch listed under the compatibiilty matrix.URL,But the datasheet for the 2960S says this:"The Cisco Catalyst 2960-S with SFP+ does not support the GLC-FE-100BX, GLC-FE-100FX, or GLC-FE-100LX."But it provides no reference for the GLC-GE-100FX,The easy answer is, no the 2960S-24TD doesn't support it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2012
I have a Cisco WS-C2960S-48TD-L with 12.2(55)SE2.This is a standalone switch, not in stack, and with no order it reboots itself looking for a new master election. On logging i have nothing, but connected with console cable i see the following after 2 minutes of not showing anything:
Waiting for Stack Master Election...
...
The switch reboots and:
...
*Mar 1 00:00:12.289: Read env variable - LICENSE_BOOT_LEVEL =
[URL]
After searching online i have no seeing nothing about disable the feature of the stack so i configure the priority for the "switch 1" to 15 and configure it the switches 2, 3 and 4 to no provision, although this switches don´t exist:
SW_ACCESS(config)#switch 1 priority 15
Changing the Switch Priority of Switch Number 1 to 15
Do you want to continue?[confirm]
New Priority has been set successfully
[URL]
With this new configuration the switch has rebooted again.Why on a standalone switch the stack is rebooting my system?Is it any feature to disable the stack?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2012
We have the following stack configuration:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image------ ----- ----- ---------- ---------- 1 28 WS-C2960S-24TS-L 12.2(55)SE3 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M 2 28 WS-C2960S-24TS-L 12.2(55)SE3 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M 3 52 WS-C2960S-48TS-L 12.2(55)SE5 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M * 4 52 WS-C2960S-48TS-L 12.2(55)SE5 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2012
I want to connect WS-C2960S-48TD-L switch to WS-X6708-10G-3CXL module in Cisco WS-C6503-E switch. WS-X6708-10G-3CXL is C6K 8 port 10 Gigabit Ethernet module with DFC3CXL which requires X2 module. on the otherhand, WS-C2960S-48TD-L requires SFP+. Now is it possible to interconnect these two switch interfaces if I use LIU in between. or does WS-X6708-10G-3CXL module supports CVR-X2-SFP+ to use SFP+ transceivers.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2011
I just upgraded several of my C2960S-48FPD-L from 12.2(55)SE to 12.2(58)SE and now almost every time I try to SSH to it the switch reboots and gives me these trace backs ...
07:58:52 CST Thu Apr 14 2011: Unexpected exception to CPU vector 200, PC = 1EADA28
-Trace back= 0x1EADA28z 0x1CDC324z 0x1EA5520z 0x1CDC35Cz 0x1CDD0E0z 0x1CDF0C4z 0x1CE06CCz 0x1CE07F8z 0x1D67348z 0x1D611BCz
Writing crash info to flash:/crashinfo_ext/crashinfo_ext_3
07:58:56 CST Thu Apr 14 2011: Unexpected exception to CPU vector 1100, PC = 121BB98
-Trace back= 0x121BB98z 0x12250FCz 0xFA7540z 0xA807B8z 0xA75DF4z 0xA78080z 0x94B708z 0x9717C0z 0x918DD8z 0x936520z 0x9344BCz 0x9345FCz 0x93484Cz 0x1D67348z 0x1D611BCz
=== Flushing messages (07:58:56 CST Thu Apr 14 2011) ===
Buffered messages: (last 4096 bytes only)
0x00000005 R6 = 0x01224F44 R7 = 0x02A23C6C
000089: *Feb 28 18:03:13.577 CST: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: R8 = 0x00000080 R9 = 0x00000000 R10 = 0x00000000 R11 = 0x00000071
000090: *Feb 28 18:03:13.577 CST: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: R12 = 0x00034855 R13 = 0x00000280 R14 = 0x01CE0778 R15 = 0x00000000
000091: *Feb 28 18:03:13.577 CST: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: R16 = 0x00000000 R17 = 0x00000000 R18 = 0x00000000 R19 = 0x00000000
[ code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2012
I am looking for a reasonable switch but it has do do inter-VLAN Routing. I know I could go with a 3560/3750 with IP Services but I am also thinking the 2960S with IP Base IOS might do?
I have looked up the IP Base IOS and it does list IP Routing but how to actually configure inter-VLAN Routing on a 2960S with IP Base?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2013
I have been trying to enable L3 intervlan routing on C2960S Switch with ip routing command and that was the output from the Switch: [code]
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2012
Is there a CLI-command to see the serial number of the flexstack module installed in a C2960S.
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2011
We have a 2960 stack of 4 WS-C2960S-24PS-L switches.Sometimes, at random, the stack crashes and reboots. I have downloaded the crashinfo file and can see the following error.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2012
We have two switches WS-C2960S-24TS-L running in stack with running IOS c2960s-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.We have connected two checkpoint devices on Gi1/0/24 and Gi2/0/24 with a simple configuration:
interface range GigabitEthernet1/0/24, gi2/0/24
switchport access vlan x
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
On the devices log we get the following message:
%SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host 0000.0000.fe21 in vlan x is flapping between port Gi2/0/24 and port Gi1/0/24
The mac-address 0000.0000.fe21 is not found on any checkpoint interface. "Show mac-address int gi1/0/24 or gi2/0/24" does not show the correct mac-address of the checkpoint interface connected to the port, but instead shows 0000.0000.fe21.Is there a bug in the IOS, something wrong with the switch config or does it have something to do with the checkpoint config?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
I have a customer with a stack of two switches C2960S-24TS-L that are running 12.2(58)SE2 universal K9, we see that the CPU load increase over time, to 95% and stays there reload solves the problem.the process that akes a lot of CPU is also the SNMP ENGINE, I see that it is running 30 minutes on 95% and then 10 minutes on 35%, this is the only stack were we see this problem. Is there also a SNMP bug in this version ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2013
Does GLC-GE-100FX is supported on the WS-C2960S-24TD-L. I don't see this switch listed under the compatibility matrix.URL
But the datasheet for the 2960S says this:
"The Cisco Catalyst 2960-S with SFP+ does not support the GLC-FE-100BX, GLC-FE-100FX, or GLC-FE-100LX." But it provides no reference for the GLC-GE-100FX The easy answer is, no the 2960S-24TD doesn't support it, any clarification if possible.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2012
is it possible to connect UCS FI directly to C2960S using Twin Ax Cable (3M long) ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
I have a very simple setup containing 3 C2960S switches:switch 1: central switch, acting as router between VLAN 1 en VLAN 2switch 2+3: edge switches, connected via 1 link to central switch, both on VLAN 2,Clients connect to switch 2 and 3 using dhcp, switch 1 uses dhcp relay to forward requests from VLAN 2 to the dhcp server on VLAN 1. So far so good.Now I want switch 1 to add option 82 to the dhcp requests so the dhcp server can see whether the request came through switch 2 or switch 3. I tried turning on dhcp option 82 support on switch 1 by doing.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2012
WS-C2960S-24PD-LCatalyst 2960S 24 GigE PoE 370W, 2 x 10G SFP+ LAN Base
Can I use the above said switch for 1 Gig Uplinks using SFP.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2013
I have three new 2960 switches as listed in the title. I configured them as follows:
192.168.1.215 host: whse-c
192.168.1.216 host: whse-b
192.168.1.217 host: whse-a
Switches B and C flow into A before continuing on into the server room switch (distance issues).All three switches are configured for ports 21-24 at 1000 and set as cisco switches. all other ports are undefined as they have a myriad of desktops, printers and non cisco access points flowing into them. side question - should i configure them as access points where applicable even if they are non cisco? I am replacing three netgear switches that currently are in place and have no known issues other than they are old and the fans may fail soon.hooked up .217. was able to get to it from the network. Hooked up 215 and then 216. All the sudden I lost the ability to tap into the switches, any of them. (I think I had done 215 at that point too, before adding 216. I found out later it took the network to its knees as internet was lost, and the MPLS stopped functioning.
I undid the changes and put the netgears back in service and all was right with the world again. At first I thought it was a bad host name as I had used whse-a on switch C in error. I changed that after this issue.Later that day I put 215 in place. checked it from the network and could get to it just fine. Then I put 216 in service. I lost connection to 215. I could no longer get to the internet from my pc and the MPLS went down again. This time I just unhooked 216. 215 is still in place and working on the network at the moment and not causing issues. (btw these switches are not even in my path from my pc to the internet, just on the same network) tomorrow I am going to try 217 again while 215 is still on the network and see if there are any issues adding that swtich. if I can do so, and there are no problems, is this an indication of a faulty switch? what further testing can I do, have I missed something in setup? If this brings the network down again, why cant i add two of these switches to each other/on the same network path (B and C were not even connected to each other yesterday evening when it went down again).
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2012
How many Switches can be stacked with WS-C2960S-48FPD-L at a max..
As per my Knowledge it is 4 and as below..
Switch 1 to Switch 2
Switch 2 to Switch 3
Switch 3 to Switch 4
Switch 4 to Switch 1
If yes then, is it mandatory to do the "Switch 4 to Switch 1" stack. why am I asking this is because this stack requires a long cable and the cable which comes with the Switch is only 0.5M.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2013
I receive a question from a future customer about this future if its supported on " WS-C2960S-24PS-L":configuring 2 dhcp server on this swith ( 1 dhcp for voice vlan , and 1 for Data Vlan).I did some search , but i didnt find the answer .i have to advice a customer before ordering the switch.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2012
My company is beginning to have a lot of sites were we are stacking 3 to 4 C2960S-48 switche.This is making "show running-config" very very long because of the 4 x 48 interfaces.I can’t find a CLI command that show me the running-config of a ranges of interfaces. If I for example would like to see running-config for switch 3 (interfaces 3/0/1-52)The Show Running-config will show all the interfaces (for the two first swtiche = 104 interfaces), which take a time before I reach to switch 3.I miss a CLI command like: show Running-config switch 3, or module 3, or show running-config interface range x/x/x-x ?I’m well aware of the CLI command show running-config interface x/x/x, but this will only show me one interface.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2011
I need to configure these qos settings in a C2960S. [code]How I calculate the buffer allocation needed? [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2012
I just received three WS-C2960S-24TS-Land three WS-C3560E-48TD-S switches that i entered the Express Setup on as usual. On two of each type of switch i found the default network that is used to facilitate the Express Setup was 10.0.1.1 and the others used an IP range of 10.0.2.1, i realized this is a small negligible at best difference though i need to provide management with an answer as to why there is a difference between the two and can’t find anything online as to why there is a difference or something that proves there should be a difference. All the documentation I find sounding Express Setup notes that the IP range will be 10.0.1.1 not 10.0.2.1
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2012
Are there any differences between the autoqos commands on a WS-C2960S switches (or in any other series)? Follow the commands:
- auto qos trust
- auto qos voip trust
I was checking the documentation on this link:
URL
And couldn't find any great difference between the two commands, as far as I could see they'll set the Ingress and Egress queues the same way.
Are there any differences between those two commands (auto qos trust and auto qos voip trust)? If so, when should I use one and the other?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2012
I want to know what is the best way to black traffic inside the same VLAN, this VLAN is a user VLAN, it means that I am talking about access layer.I wanted to use private vlan, but C2960S doesn't support this feature. Any other way to prevent any to any traffic in the user vlan, this vlan only have to speak at the Layer 3.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2011
I have a stack of 4 Cisco WS-C2960S-48FPS-L switches running c2960s-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE1 code. One of our network monitoring tools is indicating discards on a certain port on the switch. Upon further investigation I am seeing the Total output drops values change in a very odd manner.
The numbers seem to go from 573 to 1146 to 1719 then back down to 573 and it starts the same pattern over: [code]
The port utilization is quite low, the highest I've seen over the past 7 days is 3.5% with a polling period of every 30 seconds using Statseeker. Yet the discards are bouncing all over the place.
I've searched though the bugs for 12.2(58)SE1 and didn't see anything.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2012
find out which types of fiber optic that i can connect to three types of switches. the setup that i have that there are:8 access switches (WS-C2960S-24TS-S), in each one there is two SFP connections.2 aggregate switches WS-C3750X-24T-S, in each one there is four SFP connections.and one core switches that has SFP card WS-X4624-SFP-E? Note that the fiber optic that we have coming from filed are multimode.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2012
Our network administrator restricts all our new 1Gb switches to only 100Mb, to which he claims it will increase overall performance. Preventing devices from bottlenecking the network. (that is, only restricting the main switch ports, not the uplinks)For example we have a new building with 2x WS-C2960S-48TS-L connected together with FlexJack and then a 1Gb Fiber connection back to our core switch.
This building is on it's own subnet and there is little broadcast traffic. I don't see the point other than it hinders the potential speed we could use. Labs are set up in this building and 1Gb is MUCH faster when it comes to imaging and software deployment.
View 8 Replies
View Related
