Cisco Switching/Routing :: Enabling Gui On 881 Router?
Oct 25, 2011
I have an 881 router here in house and am attempting to enable the gui interface on the router.
I have tried the steps to enable http but have not had any success. Below is the IOS Version and the portion of the show config that reflects the http allow:
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(15r)XZ2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Cisco 881 (MPC8300) processor (revision 0x100) with 249856K/12288K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FTX1249Y16Q
after installation of demo versions of 2900-SEC-TEMP & 2911-2921-SSLVPN-TEMP & rebooting the 2911 router I do not have access SSL commands.Show license indicates that 2900-SEC-TEMP & 2911-2921-SSL-TEMP licenses are active but NOT IN USE.
I have two WS-C2960-24TC-L Switch with Software Ver 12.2(25r)SEE6 with image c2960-lanbase-mz.122-35.SE5.bin and 12.2(25r)SEE1 with image c2960-lanbase-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin currently on it.
I want to enable SSH connections on the switches and believe I need to import the cryto image onto the switch. I would like to upgrade it to new version that can also support ssh connection but not sure which image to download from cisco. The switches are now live.
System image file is "flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-35.SE5/c2960-lanbase-mz.122-35.SE5.bin" cisco WS-C2960-24TC-L (PowerPC405) processor (revision H0) with 61440K/4088K
I met a strange problem after enabling flow-control in 2960s.my enviroment,
- 2 cisco 2960s 24ts-l have been created a stack - IOS is 12.2(58)se2 - all ports have been enabled flowcontrol receive dersied
via show flowcontrol, I can see each Gigabyte Port have been enabled "flowcontrol receive desired" but, when I do the following tests
- connect equallogic ps4000xv to the port 21, I found the status of port is "input flow-control is off"
- connect one server with Broadcom Gigabyte Network adapter, which has been enable TX ON RX ON, or Auto, the status of the port is still "input flow-control is off"
I guess, the port status should be ""input flow-control is on". Test them with another port, I got the same result. why?
I have a pair of N7K's in vPC topology with some FEXs attached. I am looking into enabling Jumbo frame on the N7K as well as the FEX. I understand Jumbo frame is enabled globally by default.
My question is I have some interfaces in a port-channel that I need jumbo frame enabled. Do I enable it at the port-channel interface or at the physical interface ? and is the change disruptive to the network ? I am running NX-OS 6.0.2.
I have installed a EHWIC-4ESG card into my 2911 router running IOS Ver 15.1(4)M2. When I do a show diag, I can see the card, but I get the following line "Could not get card instance pa_bay=0 slot=0." Am I missing a step, do I have change something, is it not compatible (all that I have read, states that is)
One one of our Cisco 6509s I've globally enabled QoS and set a port to "trust cos". However when I look at the queueing for that interface, I notice that the receive queue thresholds have not changed to the default.
I'm kind of new to QoS so I'm not sure if I'm missing something.
We are using a Cisco 6509 running 12.2(33)SXI3 using the WS-X6724-SFP card. I thought I'd be seeing the default tail-drop thresholds, but instead I still see the defaults as if QoS were not enabled:
Queueing Mode In Rx direction: mode-cos Receive queues [type = 1q8t]: Queue Id Scheduling Num of thresholds
I can not enable to rapid- protocol in catalyst 6513, does not support for it, only support pvst.
Someone how can i enable to rpvst? You know if is necessary to upgrade IOS, it has s72033_rp-ENTSERVICESK9_WAN-M - 12.2(18)SXF9 IOS. The cisco software Advisor could not localized the features fot this IOS.
why the QoS deployment causes ports on 2960 switches to drop packets although there is no bandwidth contension? (output bit/second of the interface)packet drops at threshold 1, queue 2 ( queue 3 in config)
We are using Catalyst 2960 switches and are experiencing issues with QoS. After the QoS, we experience a lot of packet drops and it make the network slow. It appears that the slow performance relates to the egress queuing of each port.
Cisco IOS Software, C2960 Software (C2960-LANBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(50)SE5 WS-C2960-48TT-L
switch_06#show inter fa0/1 | in drops|queue|output input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported Last input never, output 00:00:01, output hang never
I have a pair of Catalyst 3560 GB switches that are trunked with two of the standard ports, and that have trunk ports connecting to a failover pair of PIX 515e's. We're considering adding a pair of cluster database nodes and an iSCSI SAN, both of which would need a dedicated interconnect VLAN that I'd like to employ Jumbo frames on. I don't necessarily need the VLANs to traverse the firewall trunks since they're private interconnects, but I need each host to traverse the switch trunks.
Since it seems I can only enable Jumbo frames on the entire switch (current standard frame size is 1500 and jumbo is also 1500), when I enable it what kind of possible negative impact could this have on my trunked ports as well as my host connections? I've read mixed reviews of users with iSCSI SAN devices seeing terrible performance when enabling jumbo frames so I'm apprehensive about enabling them on an existing network.
I got some problem with enabling dhcp snooping on 4500 (cat4500e-lanbasek9-mz.122-54.SG.bin) the topology is as below: dhcp snooping enabled only on CORE (with interface trusted to dhcp server)the problem is that I put these 2 commands
ip dhcp snooping ip dhcp snooping vlan 1
but it is not enabled on any vlan
SW-CORE#sh ip dhcp snooping Switch DHCP snooping is enabled DHCP snooping is configured on following VLANs: none DHCP snooping is operational on following VLANs:
[Code]...
On B1 if I turn it on there is a "1" in the section " DHCP snooping is configured on following VLANs:" but on core no.As you can see I did put the trusted on the interface in the direction to the dhcp.First I thought it can be a problem with option 82, I've read a lot about the issues with that, but the problem would be explicable if the client did receive IP address, but it does.
I have 2 3550 12G switches that I use as core fiber switches. Switch 1 is the primary for 1/2 the V LANs and Switch 2 is the primary for the others using MST with 2 instances (I am not including the default 0 instance). I am using HSRP to provide redundancy. So far so good.
Recently a tenant in my building would like to use their own switch for data but still needs access to a V LAN on mine for voice. Again not a problem as I can configure a trunk port and give them what they need. My concern is that if they try to configure STP on their switch can they take down mine. Are there some preventions that I can put into place, such as root guard, that work with MST? What happens if they too set up MST can they kill mine?
Switch 1 is the root for 1/2 the v lans and Switch 2 is the backup root. The scenario is flipped for the other 1/2.
I attempted to enable jumbo frames on a Nexus 5010 (NX-OS version 4.2(1)N1(1)). I created the policy map below and lost access to the switch.
policy-map type network-qos jumbo class type network-qos class-default mtu 9216
After recovery I see from the logs that all vlans and interface were suspended. I've attempted to look for reasons for a compatibility issue but I am unable to find what is checked and what could have been incompatible. The other troubling thing is the adjacent switch suspended its interfaces too but no change was done there. What I need to look out for so that this does not happen again?
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 1,10,601 on Interface port-channel1 are being suspen ded. (Reason: QoSMgr Network QoS configuration incompatible) 2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-5-IF_TRUNK_DOWN: Interface port-channel1, vlan 1,10,601 down 2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 10 on Interface port-channel508 are being suspended.
I'm trying to enable port security on several 4507R's. When I try to configure a range of ports the switch will randomly put 1 or 2 in err-disable. It's different every time I apply the config to the same group of ports. However if I do them one at a time it seems to work. But I really don't want to configure 6 fully populated switches one port at a time. We also have a lot of 3750's and they gave me no problem using a port range. [code]
I am really stuck in enabling ip routing though a simple task. I have configured 10 v LAN's in stacked 3750 switches have ip base image. I want to enable ip routing for inter V LAN communication but it is giving this error:
%COMMON_FIB-4-ISSUENCODEWRONGLEN: Message IPv6 global features, rev B for slots 2 (0x4) is wrong length (10, should be 7).
I enable the IPS on the 2911 router . I am using the Basic IPS signatures that are inbulid on the routers . But sill it showing , that no signature is active .
ip ips signature-category category all retired true ip ips signature-category category ios_ips basic retired false
This is one of the standard issue vodafone routers. So i set up web-server on my laptop, and it is accessible to the internet now.
However I need to be able to access it from my machine using the public address. But I just cannot find where to enable nat loopback. I looked for options in both regular and advanced user logins (web interfaces). So I suppose the last option is telneting into it, and using commands to do it.. but I don't know how to access it (cant find the credentials). URL
In above link it says that i can find this info in configuration file, but how to access it?
And then what commands should I use to enable the NAT loopback?
Factory default settings of my WRT54GS encryption are Disabled. When I try to enable WPA Personal encryption (>Wireless, Wireless Security), it reverts back to Disabled as soon as I make the selection. >Administration, >Wireless, >Encryption Function is Disabled.When I had this router set up at another location with another ISP, this was never an issue. How do I get the encryption function to be enabled?
A few weeks ago I noticed that at 9:00am sharp every morning my internet access dropped, and would come back up four minutes later.
The router is connected to a DSL-526B in bridge mode. My first thought was that the modem was playing up, so I factory reset it and reconfigured it.
I checked my ACLS and didn't see any rules that started or ended at 9:00 am so I just lived with it for a week or so until it got so annoying I contacted my ISP to see if they were resetting anything at 9am.
By accident, I saw that my wireless radio was being enabled aat 9:00am, as it had been for the last 2 years, when I first bought the router. But this problem has only started a few weeks ago.
So I changed the wireless schedule to see if that was really the cause for the reset, and sure enough, whatever time I changed the wireless schedule to, the router rebooted at that time.
I've also factory reset the router; twice; the first time I saved/restored my configuration, the second time I recreated all configuration from scratch.
why enabling the wireless radio resets the router, and why disabling it doesn't, and how to correct this behaviour?
I have a new HP lap top which I have connected to the net thro my edimax 7266 routerI also have another lap top and desktop connected via this router. This other lap top I can connect either wired or wireless so the router seems to be working perfectlyThe problem is when I enable the HP laptop wireless adaptor and try to connect to the net . As soon as I do this the orange light on the router goes solid from blinking and I cannot then access the net from any of the computers either wired or wireless. I have to disable the HP wireless adaptor and reboot the router to get a connection on the computers.
When accessing the E3200 router using then ERROR 501.Not Implemented.That method is not implemented. The error occured after enabling the "Local Management Access, Access via: HTTPS" option on the Administration > Management tab.I tried different browsers FireFox (version 10), Internet Explorer (version 8,9), the same error was displayed and no acces granted to the E3200 router. I reseted the router and tried the latest firmware 1.0.03 build 9 Feb 1, 2012, but after enablib the option the issue occured again and it is not possible to connect to the router.
This is my second post today trying to fix the NAT types for my 2 xbox 360. I tried the port forwarding method but with this router when I enable the ports I lost internet access in my wired devices but my wireless devices still have internet access. I even lost internet access on my computer. I never had manu problems with a router trying to get my NAT type open on my 2 xbox.
I configure HSRP on Router 2951 as a primary router, and Router 2811 as backup router. But when I am switching off my Primary router the backup router is taking 2 mins to take over form primary router.
I bought an 871w second hand with 124-24T IOS on it. I would like to enable QoS. When I use Cisco Configuration Professional to manage the router I click on QoS and it says it is not available. I know that the router itself is QoS capable.
This is my first time dealing with a router such as this and I wonder what I need to do to enable QoS.
Apparently one of my two ISPs,CenturyLink, supports 6rd connections to IPv6.
This is supported natively on my Q1000 ActionTec modem, however my modem is in "transparent bridging" mode, so that the RV042 v3 can be the only router.
how to configure the RV042 to operate in this manner.
Per the CenturyLink FAQ: the IPv6 address space is:
2602::0 /24
Most importantly, can I do this WITHOUT buying a new modem.
I'm having a problem with an ASA 5510 and software from Manage Engine (Firewall Analyzer). They are saying that sys log 113019 is not getting data over to the server where the firewall analyzer is installed. I'm checking the config and I see it enabled. Why this particular sys log info isn't making it to the reporting software when other data is.
