Cisco VPN :: 861 / UC520 / VPN Up But Cannot Ping Across
Jul 25, 2012
Have an issue where have two locations trying to get connected. first location has a cisco 861 and a uc500 for the phone system. The second location is using a UC520 for the phones and as the router. Below are the configurations of the 861 and the UC520.
Cisco 861
Current configuration : 7635 bytes
!
version 15.0
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
[code]....
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 8, 2011
We have Cisco UC520 Router, We are facing Network problem in our Office due to high memory & CPU Uses of UC520, sometime 100% CPU Used of UC520 and we have lossed internet access from Router from last two day's, all was going well before two day's, we haven’t had this happen before Last Thursday, but when I reboot router it's working again
coinop-uc520#sh proc cpu his
coinop-uc520 02:38:41 PM Saturday Apr 9 2011 WST
111112222211111
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2011
I am constantly getting error on UC520W Wifi from last Night, I am not getting with this error. What is the cause of this error, or is there any issue on UC520. [Code] .........
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2011
I have a server that I lease that is hosted at a datacenter. Our company is going to lease a half rack and put our own equipment in it as well as a disaster recovery site. The problem is that the one server I mentioned has SQL on it and we have applications that were devloped in house ages ago that hit that SQL instance. Those applications are hard coded to the IP address of that server. We could just change it in the code, but the source code for one of the applications have disappeared over time. Now that you know my situation, my question is this. Can I make a NAT rule or something that says when traffic is destined for xxx.xxx.xxx.123, to re-routes it to xxx.xxx.xxx.321? Currently our endpoint device here is a Cisco UC520. The other end we have no control over.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2011
I am trying to setup time service on two devices. Once is a UC520, the second an 1840 router. I would like to use the FQDN of the time server which is north-america.pool.ntp.org. This is the recommended procedure as per ntp.org due to changes of IP addresses of time servers.
On the UC520 this is not a problem. I type in "ntp server north-america.pool.ntp.org" and this is how the command stays in the config. On the 1800 the FQDN is resolved and inserted into the config as an IP address. This works for now but kinda defeats the purpose of using a FQDN.
How can I keep the 1800 from converting to IP?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
I have a server that I lease that is hosted at a datacenter. Our company is going to lease a half rack and put our own equipment in it as well as a disaster recovery site. The problem is that the one server I mentioned has SQL on it and we have applications that were devloped in house ages ago that hit that SQL instance. Those applications are hard coded to the IP address of that server. We could just change it in the code, but the source code for one of the applications have disappeared over time. Now that you know my situation, my question is this. Can I make a NAT rule or something that says when traffic is destined for xxx.xxx.xxx.123, to re-routes it to xxx.xxx.xxx.321? Currently our endpoint device here is a Cisco UC520. The other end we have no control over.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2012
I've configured in an UC520 a SSL VPN.I can access properly and I can see the labels, but I only can access urls which are http, not https:I can access the default ip of the uc520 (192.168.1.10) but When I try to get access to a secure url I get the msg: Failed to validate server certificate I'm trying to access a Cisco Digital Media Manager, whose url is URL Does the certificate of both hardware has to be the same?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2012
Let me start with some infrastructure details ...
Cisco C2901 as our Main Router
Cisco UC520 as Communication Platform
Cisco C3560x as Core-Switch
VLAN 10 : Data
VLAN 100 : VOICE
Everything is working but i m not sure if the switchport config is right in that way.
As an example :
interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
switchport access vlan 10
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 100
spanning-tree portfast
When we connect an Cisco 7971g and an pc everything is working fine. But when i start wireshark on the pc behind the phone you see a lot of UDP Traffic source UC520 destination 239.10.16.8 or 239.10.16.16. At this point i m getting confused. So i start looking for the cisco phone config, VLAN ID on the phone is 100 (i think that is ok) but the PC-VLAN part is empty?
The main thing is, how can i stop this cisco-sccp traffic on the pc port (prtg shows me a average of 200 kbit/s) i think it is an config fault.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2012
I have a sge2000p to install with a uc520. I have all data traffic passing ok but voice will not work. Phones to not get ip etc.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2012
I have a new 3560G to set up a small network for a remote site. I configured the vlan and an SVI as the gateway. The switch is also the DHCP server for the LAN. I configured Gi0/2 as L3 port, connecting to the nearest neighbor. My network runs EIGRP so i advertised the routes into the EIGRP process. The switch forms EIGRP neighbors and learns all routes in the enterprise network. The problems I'm having now are: 1. The switch learns all routes in my enterprise LAN and can ping devices in the enterprise LAN, but I can’t ping any interface on the switch from the enterprise LAN. 2.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2011
I set this up and I can ping all the gateways but never the hosts. I was hoping I could make these links between 6500's a mix of L2 and L3. Check it out. They are connected in a linear fashion R1--->R2--->R3. I can ping from R1 to R3's SVI4 gateway but I can never ping a host on that SVI4. I was hoping that I could use the port-channels between 6500's as routed links or as trunk links depending on the type of traffic....thought it would ease the migration. I suppose I could always get rid of the port-channels and just make separate L2 and L3 links between the 6500's.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2013
From My Router that connects to Cable modem i am unable to ping website 4.2.2.2I am able to ping all other websites fines.Same website i can ping from my pc and all other switches fine.Router has only 1 ACL thats for NAT.
View 25 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2011
When I ping an address from my windows machine, it succeeds, but when I ping to the same IP on my MAC OS X machine, it fails.
1. Why?
2. How to get successful ping on my MAC machine?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2012
I installed window server 2003 in a old Pentium III server as a standalone test server. Now I want to use it as a print server and connected it to the domain. I can ping workstations and other servers from that test svr. But i cannot ping that test server from the work stations.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2013
I had both a Westell 7500 and a Linksys Router working fine and had my 360 setup as an extender for Windows Media Center so I could stream TV, Music, Movies, etc from my desktop to the 360. Then I switched my modem/router out with a Zyxel PH5001Z
So now today I noticed that I can no longer find my desktop through the XBox. I have adjusted my firewall settings on the modem itself, even completely disabling it. UPnP is enabled for the 360 and the device is showing under my device table. At first I wasn't able to ping any network devices but after creating an ICMPv4 Firewall rule it worked fine. I've confirmed the XBox IP Address through Network Map, the Device Table on the modem and through Network Settings on the XBox. I've diabled my modem firewall as well as Windows Firewall, completely and I still can't ping my XBox or set it up as an Extender.
I have the XBox connected wirelessly using WPA2-Personal and it's operating in 802.11g/n mode.
View 19 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
I have a strange issue on my ASA 5510 (8.4). I can't ping or connect to the VPN clients but the VPN clients can ping/connect to any inside resources. I have checked all the NAT extemtion entries.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2011
Been racking my brains out for hours now, my remote access VPN via Cisco VPN Client is UP i can ping the RA VPN DG but cant get no further than that relevant config below i can ping 192.168.250.1 and it replies with the public ip address, but i cant ping any 192.168.101.* addresses.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2011
Ok, I have a ASA 8.4 firewall that I have been working on so long. It was a hassle to configure the object group and nat for 8.4. So, I put two host in both side of ASA to test pinging but I can not ping the outside or the DMZ. I attached my nat config.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2012
I have a network with three vlans: vlan 10 (172.16.10.0), vlan 20 (172.16.20.0) and vlan 30 (172.16.30.0).I want to make sure that clients in vlan 10 can access to vlan 30, but not access to vlan 20.Vlan 20 can also access only vlan 30.i have configured a router on a stick and the acl's, but some how i can't ping from vlan 20 to vlan 30. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2013
when we ping from pc in lan 1 to pc in lan 2, what protocols we walk through in request and in response??
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2013
url...I am not able to Ping from PC to PC. But i am able to ping from PC to Router and Router to Router. Heres the routers running config.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2011
The VPN connection seems to be etablish but I can not ping the LAN behind the router .I can see the errors with debug ipsec
88.160.250.90 CLIENT VPM >>>>>>>ROUTEUR VPN 212.94.A.B>>>>>>>>>LAN 10.100.0.182
212.94.A.B (Router with configuration IPSec VPN)
88.160.250.90 (Client VPN vpnc)
192.168.2.25 (Client VPN remote ident : tun0 )
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2013
*I have 2 cisco routers 2811 router A&B*using 0/0 for WAN and 0/1 for LAN on both routers*both routers are connected together with crossover cable to 0/0. recieve link and activity*both routers are on the same subnet Router A:0/0 192.168.1.1/24 - router A:0/1 192.168.2.1/24 ; Router B:0/0 *192.16.1.2/24 router B:0/1 192.168.3.1/24*I can ping the inside and outside address of both router from PCs connected at its respectable end. *PC A 192.168.2.2/24 PC B 192.168.3.2/24 *when connected to router A 0/1 and I try to ping router B 0/0 it times out in DOS* but I AM (CAN) able to ping from PC A to router B 0/0 in hyperterminal, telnet and Cisco SDM. I just CANNOT ping in DOS?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
I have a Cisco 2801 with dual ADSL WAN connections, PATing to a network hanging on the fa0/1 interface. From the server connected to the router (hanging off of the fa0/1) interface, I can ping any address and there are no issues. But from inside the Cisco CLI, pinging certain addresses causes erratic behavior. [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
I've made a static route between a Cisco Router 1760 and a Cisco Router 2651xm using crossover cable to connect to their Fast-Ethernet ports so this is the configuration:
2651xm(config)#ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.1.0.
And the other router's configuration:
2651xm(config)#ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.1.0 (Same thing)
The IP of the 2651xm is 192.168.10.2
The IP of the 1760 is 192.168.10.1.3
I'm I doing it wrong? is the destination wrong? I can't seem to ping any other IP. I've got another laptop. I've put a static IP of 192.168.10.5, the primary Laptop is using has an IP of 192.168.1.138. I'm trying to PING the 192.168.10.5 laptop. But this doesn't work.
View 35 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2012
am not sure if it is different on the 8.2 or if I am missing something. I can connect to the vpn but cannot get to the inside computers. I can ping them from the ASA but not from the vpn client.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2012
We are using non-advertised IPs on many devices, but LMS is attempting to ping these addresses and setting off all sorts of security alarms. How to stop LMS 4.1 from pinging the interfaces? We don't even want LMS to do any fault monitoring so if that could be turned off, it would be even better.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2012
Today we physically moved an ASA 5510 across town and took another location off of fiber and onto a VPN with the asa 5510, via a brand new 5505. The VPN seems to be up however no local traffic seems to be passing. The ASA 5510 can ping to the internal network of the 5505 but not vice versa.
The site that was moved is the 62.0 network, it is connected to the rest of the network through the new ASA 5505. I'm sure this is something elementary that I somehow missed.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2011
I haven't come across this before and have been scratching my head about it for the last few hours and need a second (or third or fourth!) pair of eyes here.
I have an ASA5510 at the network edge, an inside interface of 10.1.0.x, a dmz interface of 192.168.1.x
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2011
I'm setting up an 1841 as a basic router for now and I cant get it to work.
[code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 30, 2012
I'm going through the CCNA training and I'm setting up my DHCP server on my 871 router. I have my cable modem into the WAN port on my router and have 1 host plugged directly into Fastethernet 1. I can ping any IP I want from the IOS prompt but I only have local access from the host. [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2011
I know there has already been a couple of threads on this but rather than add my question to the bottom of one of those I thought I would try afresh.
We have an 857W connected to the internet via ADSL. All works very well, however if I ping from an attached PC the first one always times out. If i ping from the router (ping { URL}source 192.168.18.1) I get !!!!! every time. Back to the PC and 'Request timed out' on the first.
The only way I have been able to resolve this is by using no ip cef. It then works as expected, first ping and all. The problem is after much reading, it is not ideal to disable cef.
View 21 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2013
in the last days i'm encountering some issue about ping on some 2950 access layer.These ones are directly connect (fiber trunk) to 4500 core switches. Ping response is very high between 200 up to 600 ms for a period about 30-40 seconds, then returns to normal valueI tried to ping every host connected to this 2950 and ping responses are normal 1ms or less.
View 7 Replies
View Related
