I seem to be having an issue with my PIX configuration. I can ping the VPN client from the the internal network, but can cannot access any resources from the vpn client. [code]
View 4 RepliesI have 2 firewalls in my network: ASA 5505 and PIX 506E. Both firewalls's internal network is in the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet but their external addresses are different of course. The inside IP for ASA 5505 is 192.168.0.254/24 whereas the PIX is 192.168.0.1/24. I've successfully configured VPN on the ASA 5505. I'm able to VPN to the ASA and can ping / access hosts that have the 192.168.0.254 as their gateways.However, I'm unable to ping/access hosts behind the PIX. What do I need to do in order to allow access to the network behind the PIX after I VPN to the ASA? Also, I'm unable to ping 192.168.0.254 after I VPN to the ASA.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have created remote access vpn in my ASA 5505. The tunnel is established but i am not able to access the internal network.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow to configure SSH access on my PIX 506e. I would like to use local authentication with no AAA server. Also I would like to have telnet disabled completely.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to give a vendor VPN access so that they can remotely monitor and diagnose their installed heating and cooling equipment. I dont know where to start and I apologize in advance for my ignorance. I am technically savvy but i have no Cisco knowledge base.
It is a PIX 506e firewall with PIX v6.3.
I have a problem with PIX 506E that meets the version 6.1, and in an simple computer network equipment seems to behave in strange ways because some web sites do not open or very open slow thereby its operation impracticable. On the other hand other web sites open normally.
Querying the web site of the Cisco, I found several documents discussing the same problem but in a later version ( 7.0 ), not in this version 6.1.
I've tried removing the pix from the network , not the error occurred, again insert pix however tested only with a machine, without the rest of the network and the problem persists
We have ASA5510s and I've configured an SSL VPN using AnyConnect.. The VPN address pool is 10.10.10.0/24 and our internal network is 10.10.20..0/24. After successful login, using LDAP. the client receives a 10.10.10.0/24 address from the pool, but cannot access anything on the internal 10.10.20.0/24 network. I've toyed with access lists and NAT exemption, but to no avail. What do I need to do?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am trying to build a remote vpn in ASA 5520 Software Version 8.3(1). I am using ASDM 6.3(1) for the configuration. I went through the SSL VPN wizard and did the configuration. I tried connecting to the ASA using anyconnect VPN and I could successfully connect the VPN. My home laptop takes an IP 192.168.60.21 (which I have defined in the wizard). Now my issue is, I can't access any office internal network from this laptop (none of the internal IP is ping ing even). Meanwhile, I could ping and rdp to this laptop(which is connectd by anyconnect VPN) from my office network. One thing I noticed is that when I give a traceroute to an internal IP from the laptop, the first hop goes to my home ISP router.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a base config of AnyConnect VPN below, however the ASA 8.3.1 code has deprecated some commands and the VPN/NAT/FW rule syntax is quite different. Can som point out what's missing from the pertinent config below that prevents the VPN Pool from accessing the internal LAN?
The Core LAN router is 1.2.3.1.
!
ASA Version 8.3(1)
!
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 1.2.3.2 255.255.255.0
What I got is a 5505 ASA firewall and I'm connected to it via VPN. I'm pulling an 192.168.169.x address because that's what we set their company's internet LAN to. Which is what we want. What I can't do while I'm VPN'd in is ping from the internet network to the DMZ, and the same when I try and ping from the DMZ to the internal network.
The DMZ is on a 196.0.0.x network.The internet network is 192.168.169.x network.
I don't need them to have internet access on the DMZ I just want to be able to access it from the internal network. What is going on is we need them to be able to VPN into the DMZ and access their equipment. At this point it would just make me happy to be able to ping from the internal network to the DMZ and I can figure it out from there I've setup rules and applied them and when I wasn't having success I referred back to defaults. Right now the rules are set at default, any thing in and anything out, on both internal and DMZ. I'm using a VPN client and going through Cisco ASDM Launcher to setup the rules and static routes, I haven't done anything with the command line. All the research I've done everyone does it command line, I find it easier to do it GUI. This is my first time working with an ASA firewall.
I have created a new sub-interface on our ASA 5520 for guest internet access.
My goal is to allow access to a few specific services hanging off some dmz interfaces on the same firewall and full unrestricted access to the internet only. Everything else should be out of bounds.
The order of the rules I plan to setup on the guest interface inbound are:
#1. <rules to allow access to specific services in the dmz>
#2. <block any ip access to the entire private network ip address space>
#3. <permit ip any any>
#1. These rules will give access to the guest user to services located in the dmz
#2. This rule will block all access to any services in the private ip address space (thus blocking access to all internal services)
#3. This rule is to allow access to any other services i.e. the internet.
Is this the best way to achieve my goal in the most secure way or is there a better way? i.e. is there a way to force the traffic by default to only go out the outside interface unless there is a specific rule allowing it go elsewhere?
(Of course Dynamic PAT will also be configured for traffic coming from the guest interface to the outside interface.)
After connecting via anyconnect client 2.5, I cannot access my internal network or internet. My Host is getting ip address of 10.2.2.1/24 & gw:10.2.2.2
Following is the config
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
names
name 172.16.1.200 EOCVLAN198 description EOC VLAN 198
dns-guard
!
interface Ethernet0/0
description to EOCATT7200-G0/2
switchport access vlan 2
[code]....
I am using ASA 5520 with 8.2.4 IOS. I'm new to ASA/Firewall. I need to do access webserver from outside network.From Laptop (192.168.2.51), If I connect to url... it should open page from 10.10.10.50.I also need to ssh to webserver from laptop. If I ssh to 192.168.2.50 from laptop, it should connect to 10. 10. 10.50. [code]I can't get to webserver from outside network, so now, I connected laptop to directly ASA 5520 outside port with crossover cable.ASA Inside port connects to L3 switch. Webserver also connects to L3 switch. But still doesn't work.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have configured Clientless SSL VPN for access to ASA 5540 internal network. Still I am unable to take ssh to my core switc [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have the syntax correct and thought process down right on a solution to allowing guest wireless users access to an internal webserver. (DMZ discussion aside)
We have an ASA5510 with interfaces setup as:
outside - 65.x.x.x address
inside - 172.20.1.2
guest_inet - 10.2.1.1
Internally clients resolve our website to 192.168.40.40 and that part works as it should. Clients outside of our network resolve our website to the correct external address (lets just call it 1.1.1.1). We have a NAT statement static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 and an ACL to permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq www
Clients on our guest_int use an external DNS server and hence resolve our website to 1.1.1.1. However it seems traffic goes out and back in our outside interface and this connection never occurs.
What I'm wondering is the correct NAT statement / ACL to add that would allow our internal clients on the 10.2.1.x network to access our internal website. Would that be: static (inside,guest_inet) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 ? Since there is already an ACL permitting port 80 traffic to 1.1.1.1 we should be taken care of on the ACL side of things, right?
I have a 5505 between a vendor router & my company network, vendor is not able to access devices on internal network. I am also not able to access the firewall via asdm
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco wireless infrastructure in place that includes a guest network with its own subnet that is a sub interface of the inside interface on our ASA 5520. There are no routes for it to be allowed access to the internal subnets. So it can only access the internet. This is primarily used by the public, but we have several non employee personnel that we only want to give internet access and force them to access the internal network through our clientless SSL vpn portal or through other internet facing internal resources such as webmail.I have done packet traces from within the ASA and the break appears to be there is no ACL allowing the traffic back into the network once the web resource replies to the request and the traffic is attempting to come back into the network from the web resource. Is that as clear as mud?
I know that this has to be a common problem and a way around this is to allow the guest wireless network access to the internal network but only for the select resources that they require. And that this can be done seemlessly by network specific routes and or alternate DNS entries, but I would like to keep this simple and just allow them to access the web resource, webmail and VPN, from the guest wireless using internet DNS servers without route trickery.
Currently i am having a scenario where i have setup RV042 and which is connected to Microsoft Forefront 2010. PPTP works fine only on rv042 subnet but i am not able to access the "internal" network of TMG.RV042 (172.16.1.1) ---> TMG [external] (172.16.1.2) ---> TMG [internal] (192.168.1.1) Is there any way through static route to access the TMG internal network through RV042 pptp server?
View 1 Replies View Relatedit is possible to enable Xauth on pix. I have read multiple threads about using the following cmds:
username test123password testing privilege 2
aaa-server LOCAL protocol local
crypto map mycrypto client authentication LOCAL
However the f/w wont let me add the crypto map cmd, just comes back with the following:
PIX(config)# c.rypto map mycryptomap client authenication LOCAL
Usage: [ show ] crypto { ca | dynamic-map | ipsec | isakmp | map | sa } ...
show crypto engine [verify]
[ show | clear ] crypto interface [counters]
I also tried the following, but they dont work and I am not sure if they are meant for Xauth since I was under the impression that it had to be enabled globally.
PIX(config)# vpngroup test authentication-server LOCAL
Protocol "local" is not supported for authentication of remote users of a h/w client
PIX(config)# vpngroup test user-authentication
[code]....
There is a PIX 506E and ASA5510, with different connection to service provider. Problem is Apple remote users can't access resources protected by the PIX506E. Apple users can access resources protected by ASA5510. Physically the PIX and ASA are in close proximity with no physical connections. Is it possible for Apple users to authenticate with the ASA and the traffic get routed to and get authenticated by the PIX, inorder to access resources?Due to bandwidth restrictions, a DMZ on the ASA will not be created at this time inorder to consolodate firewalls. Currently 2 x T1 is the connection between ASA and ISP; 1 T1 connects PIX to ISP.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a PIX506E that was resently reset and it has version PIX Version 7.1(2) . It either uses some different commands or I am not using them correctly. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedSo i got a Cisco PIX 506e from a friend and want to set it up for a VPN. Though i cant download the PDM (PIX Device Manager) since i dont have a Contract or something like that. So i cant set it up.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to replace an ageing PIX 506e with an ASA 5505.The current setup looks like this: The PIX is used for site-to-site VPN connection via the WAN 2 link. The WAN 1 link is used for general Internet connectivity.I don't have access to the Draytek Router as it is supported by a 3rd party, but I believe it uses static routing to direct the relevant traffic to/from the PIX.
When I replace the PIX with the ASA, the inside i/f connection experiences dropouts - but no errors show in the logs.The only significant difference I can see in the config is that the ASA utilises VLans for the inside & outside interface configs - I used the PIX-to-ASA Migration tool to make the initial configuration on the ASA.In tests, if I only connect the inside i/f of the ASA, pings from the LAN are stable. Once I connect the outside i/f, pings timeout approx 80% of the time.
I am new to the PIX firewall. And recently implemented the PIX 506e in my network. I wants to know how we can monitor the system that is generating the more traffic on Network through Firewall.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to add a username to the local database for remote VPN connection but always i get this error when I add,Encrypted password is of incorrect lengthUsername addition failed.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just got a PIX 506e from a friend that was not longer using it. I'm trying to get started with the configuration page. I've reset it to factory defaults, rebooted and connected up ethernet. I can ping the device at 192.168.1.1 and access it via console. I browse the site https://192.168.1.1/startup.html, get the invalid ssl certification, get a login prompt (user/pass) and as the document says I leave it blank. As soon as I hit ok it goes to the 404 error Page Not found.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWhat is the easiest way to restore my config? I backed it up yesterday with my tftp server. Today I made some changes and messed some things up and need to restore the config from yesterday.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI cannot access Internal network to DMZ with public ip but i can access public servers in DMZ with External network.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm getting an error message on my 506E that is saying not enough flash space to install the new version 8 software. I did a clear flashfs command and then tried again but get the same error. Do the PIX 506E can be upgraded from version 6 to version 8? I am trying to install pix804-28.bin.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI trying to do password reset on a 506e that I got with the current password unknown. I've gone to the Cisco URL for the reset: [code]
I am using the correct bin file as I checked with my pix version. Also I CANNOT ping the firewall from a PCor system on the network, but CAN ping everthing from the PIX.I've tried using interface 1 but no go. Also I've checked the TFTP software (Solarwinds) is running fine and I've unblocked it in XP's firewall.
So I have a Cisco PIX 506e that I've modified a bit, but am quite happy w/ when it comes to performance and configuration (I can actually set up the VPN server w/o too much thought.) I also have a Mikrotik Routerboard 750, I'm no longer using it as my router due to a few config issues I had plus the fact I had to hard code my internet gateway's arp address into the device due to some issues.
What I am wanting to do, which I'm sure is possible and easily accomplished (I just don't have the time right now to try it) is set the routerboard up behind my pix and have it function as an ipv6 router, while the pix handles my ipv4 duties. I've already set up the routerboard w/ an ipv6 tunnel broker when I had it running as my router, I am just curious if it will work in a similar fashion when configured behind an ipv4 device.
We have gotten our anyconnect clients to connect to the VPN with no issues and verifying credentials with RADIUS. Remote users however cannot access internal resources through the VPN. I know I need to setup an NAT Exempt statement for my VPN Pool to the Internal Network,
View 5 Replies View RelatedCurrently, we allow /24 into our DMZ as follow: [code] Now, if we need to extended the /24 to a bigger scope ( range of 15 class C networks ) : can I just re-used the static route or should I use a ACL to allow traffic? This is on a ASA5585
View 1 Replies View Related