how many SSL VPN Users are supported in Cisco1921-SEC/K9 routers? Or do i need to separately purchase SSL-VPN User license- FL-SSLVPN25-K9 (Cisco SSLVPN Feature License-25 Users) separately?
My client requires 25 Users SSL VPN.
I have a Cisco 1921 Router, a Cisco Catalyst 2960 and a Cisco Catalyst 2970 and I want the router to be able to assign ip-addresses by what VLAN a device is active on.
VLAN1: 10.0.0.0/24
VLAN2: 10.0.1.0/24
The router is connected to the Catalyst 2960 and there on to the Catalyst 2970 so the VLAN1 and VLAN2 is active on the to switches and the Router.is it possible?
I make qos on VPN Tunnel, but i make command service-policy output name, it show the error below Traffic Shaping feature is not supported in user defined class of parent level policy.My cisco router 1921, IOS : c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M5.bin
View 1 Replies View RelatedThis is a feature that I have researched for by looking at ISRs G2 data sheets and cisco.com website.The number of users that can be supported or the recommended number of users per router chassis/model is not mentioned anywhere.However this is mentioned in the Cisco 880 ISR data sheet. What are the number of users that can be supported or the recommended number of users on Cisco 1900/2900/3900 ISRs?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe want to puchase new Cisco ISR 1921/K9 . i want to know does it support the following sample IP-SLA commands
ip sla 2icmp-echo 172.16.1.2timeout 500frequency 1ip sla schedule 2 life forever start-time now
track 10 rtr 1 reachability
delay down 1 up 1
!
track 20 rtr 2 reachability
delay down 1 up 1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 track 10ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.2 track 20
Im asking above question because we will need to enable ip-sla on the mentioned router. as i read on the cisco webside, it says Cisco-ISR-1921/K9-IP Base support only IP-SLA RESPONDER feature nothing else. If Cisco-921/K9 does not support the above commands , should i go for ordering Cisco-1921-SEC/K9 ?
We have Cisco 1921 routers that a provider is using for MPLS. They have it configured so that all internet trafic is passed to an internal ip address that is our proxy server. However, they are pushing all of the routing rules down to the workstation which is causing the local route tables to grow to be massive in a very short time.For example, the second I ping a website, the ip address is resolved and then the route is added for the source ip address with the default gateway of the proxy server.I would have thought that all the rules would have been handled by the router and let it keep the table entries.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am curious of the max supported SIP sessionf of the SRP500 series.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow many SDR (Secure Domain Routers) supported on ASR9001?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow many ipsec tunnels are supported in Cisco 3900 routers(with & without the hardware processors)?How much is the throughput of the 3900 routers?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am now trying to configure a Cisco Small Business Pro SRP 521w router for a branch office, i am trying to get the router to connect to a L2TP VPN server inside my datacenter, but seems to me like L2TP VPN client function is not supported inside the SRP 521w router.
Can Cisco implement L2TP VPN client into the firmware for the SRP 521w router in the future ?
we are trying to configure one to one NAT translations on a Cisco 527W-U, but are having some problems. We are running firmware version 1.2.4 (003) on the 527.
The DSL line is assigned with a /29 address range x.x.x.64 /29?
The DSL WAN interface picks up x.x.x.65 /32 from the Radius server. We are using the default private IP address range 192.168.15.0 /24 on the LAN (VLAN1), and can get to the internet ok with a PC connected to the LAN.
However when we try to set up a public IP address in the same range (eg x.x.x.66 /29) on VLAN1 (with x.x.x.67 on the PC) it will not connect. (won't allow us to configure an address from the same range as the WAN on a new VLAN interface).
we would want to be able to do one to one NAT translations eg x.x.x.66 on the outside to 192.168.15.2 inside, x.x.x.67 outside to 192.168.15.3 inside etc, but this will not either. We have tried this on a normal IOS router (887) and it worked ok. We have also tried the same on a small DSL router / modem product similar to the 527 from another manufacturer and it worked ok on that, but we wanted it to be able to work on the 527.
We have tried the NAT bypass feature without any success, reading several other discussion forums on this website leads me to believe that one to one NAT is not supported on this equipment at the moment, or at least not at the current firmware release.
One work around would be to just assign a /32 to the WAN interface on the DSL and route statically to a different routed subnet configured on the LAN, however we were wanting to avoid having to do that if possible.
Have a 1921 that has 3 eth connections (1 LAN, and 2 WAN) - I have 2 seperate OSPF processes (2 areas) on the WAN Ints - both upstream WAN's are sending defaults back to the 1921, and the 1921 is sending it's LAN range to them.
I have ip ospf cost 150 set on the "failover" WAN connection interface (Both on the 1921 and upstream), but the 1921 is preferring the default route from the "failover"?
The default routes are both being received by the 1921, but it's preferring the "failover" Int with the ip ospf cost 150 configured?
Is temperature monitoring via snmp supported on Cisco 2801 routers? when i perform a snmpwalk i donot get the associated value for the oids.
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy book says there are two types of firewall supported on cisci ios routers:
Classic cisco ios firewall
Zone-based policy firewall.
zone-based policy firewall with configurations ?
What kind of firewall is supported on Cisco PIX 515E ? Is it Classic CIsco ios firewall or Zone-based policy firewall ?
We have a Cisco SA540. It has been an extremely reliable UTM router. Other than SSL VPN not working for Mac OSX, we are very pleased with the unit.We have a 3 year contract for IPS, a 3 year contract for Trend Micro Protectlink Web, and a 3 year contract for Small Business Support Service for the unit.Right now we are trying to setup the VIP functionality but it is not going very well. To sum it up in a few words, we cannot get the SA540 to prompt the SSL VPN users to enter the 6-digit access code.
We setup an account at Verisign and requested a trial for VIP. They promptly setup the trial account. Getting everything setup was a breeze. The Verisign website is very well documented. They even had specific instructions for Cisco SA500 Series routers!!! We were very impressed with Verisign's implemenation. We are able to get our SA540 to talk to Verisign (basically, when we activate or deactivate an SSL VPN VIP user in the SA540 web GUI, you can immediately see it enabling or disabling the user on the Verisign website... it is very cool).Unfortunately no matter what we do, we cannot get the SA540 to prompt the SSL VPN user to enter the one time 6-digit code. In this case, we are using Verisign's iPhone app called 'VIP Access'.
I called into the SBSC and talked to a guy. I felt really bad for him. He used WebEx to log into my desktop and I showed, and explained, to him how all of it worked (setting up VIP in the SA540 web GUI, as well as, and the Verisign website). He had no clue about Verisign, VIP, or the two-factor authentacation concept at all. I told him that he needed to escalate my case to the SA500 Series team, but of course he had to try. He was supposed to call me back yesterday or today. I am sure he is dreading calling me back as he probably still has no clue.
How to use the VIP functionality? Or how it works and set it up? We would like to at least get it to work before our 30-day trial period is up. I have a distinct feeling that the functionality used to work, but Cisco hasn't kept up the firmware with all the latest back-end API calls to Verisign or something similar.
I have a Cisco Small Business RV180 and I have several VPN users configured. IPsec between my home router (also an RV180) and work router (router in question) is working fine, several PPTP users working fine and 1 QVPN user that works as well. I set up another qvpn user and it didn't work. I went back into the router to check and make sure I hadn't goofed something up and saw that I had 8 lines, 1 and 2 were the QVPN users and 6 other PPTP users, however, the "pages" footer (for lack of a better word) only displays 1 -5 of 5 instead of the 1-8 of 8 I would expect it to show.I dumped the cfg file and opened it up, all 8 user configurations show up. One was my user account which showed negative numbers for the logon time, something like -1day -hours -minutes -sec, so I thought that that might be locking up the router or something so I deleted my PPTP account but it didn't allow the new user access. I deleted all PPTP accounts and no luck there either.I'm running firmware 1.0.2.6.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI need a name resolution within my pptp users. How do I configure the dns settings of a pptp user client.
View 4 Replies View RelatedTrying to hook up to my blu ray player for a internet connection, but the blu ray is telling me to check the pc for a shared users so it can connect!
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have 8 users in my office. i want to enable the URL Filtering for only 5 users in my office and 3 users will have no URL Filtring.
View 7 Replies View Relatedhow can i configure the SSL VPN users connexion to connecte from my remote PC (Windosws 7 32 & Internet Explorer
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have Ports open, with DNS named defined for internal services..
When extertnal they work by name just fine, so the firewall's working Ok. But when on the LAN they fail.
When I look at the port forwarding rules, I see Outside -> Inside, but there's no Inside -> Inside..
How can my LAN users use DNS Names/Ports that are on the WAN interface,,. so when they come between the WAN and LAN their apps continue to work ?
We have a client that is looking to provide connectivity for up to 800 users at a conference. They have a SRP527W available to them. Looking at the configuration we have been able to provide the needed number of IP addresses through VLANs each with their own DHCP scope.
However we are doubtful that the router will be able to process such a high number of connections (NAT, Firewall etc.) even though they will be using a specialised application that pulls static content via WAN.
Thus far we have been told that the unit has supported 150 user no issue, my I am guessing anything over 200 and you would start to see stability issues?
A client of mine has a Cisco RV042 Router. I've configured it to run VPN and it works, sort of. Some clients can connect, others can't, for no discernible reason.
Specific machine issues are Windows 7 x64 or x86, Quick VPN latest release, unobtrusive (Avast or Microsoft Security Essentials) security, etc. 2 separate machines on the same home remote network, 1 can connect just fine, the other can't. My laptop (Win7 x64) connects just fine, one of my techs can connect OK, the IT support guy that works for this client can connect.
Particulars of the router: Firmware version: v4.0.4.02; PID VID : RV042 V03; Firmware MD5 Checksum : 1f84d8d0a2a8b99f9bfa4409e64547aa
how to limit the bandwidth in digicom router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe assign (reserve by MAC actually) static IPs to all of our devices. Over time we have gotten rid of some devices but haven't begun (or finished really) re-using the old IPs. On our WRVS4400N v2 routers we are able to set the max number of DHCP users per Vlan. This prevents unauthorized devices trying to connect to our LAN.For example. I set the range from 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.103. IPs 100, 101, and 103 are in use (reserved via MAC address). We set max number of DHCP users to 3. This prevents someone from gaining access to 192.168.1.102. Does this make sense? Or at least this was the initial goal and it tested out successfully back when we implemented it.
How can I do the same for with the RV220W? I can set the range, assign static IPs (reserve IPs by MAC address), but can't keep others from gaining accessing to our LAN via the unused IPs (not assigned a static IP).My initial thought was to create static IPs (for the unused IPs) using dummy MAC addresses. I'm sure there is a much better way of accomplishing what I am trying to do.
I want to setup a simple VPN to allow users to access the office via the iOS (iPad/iPhone) devices. I assume I do this through:
VPN>IPsec>Basic VPN Setup
BUT, what do I enter for the "Endpoint Information" and "Secure Connection Remote Accessibility"?
I have a RV220W setup with SSL VPN users, authenticating to an internal Active Directory. Maybe 5 ports forwarded and 8 external IP addresses. Besides this i have 1 data VLAN and a voice vlan on my network.
The reboots are on different times on a day, even on Sundays at 7 AM when noone is logged in to the network.FW is at 1.0.4.17.
I've just deployed a SRP527W that I've had lying around for a while.Everything on the unit runs as well as can be expected, however I have a requirement to run split tunneling for VPN users.
Currently the only route that the VPN client receives is a default route. I noticed that on site to site VPN's and GRE tunnels you can specify secured routes, however I can't find anything that relates to the VPN remote users. This can be done on IOS without a problem but would be nice for the SRP.
I'm running the latest firmware 1.01.26, so if I haven't overlooked something would this be likely for a future release?
is it possible to share the same network segment like my LAN for mobile users? In a so called bridge mode? I got a VPN tunnel to a customer from my local network and i need to access it within the mobile access. I can not change the VPN Site to Site tunnel.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a RV042 and have set it up for VPN Client access using the QuickVPN client to connect my remote users. I discovered today that I cannot have two users connect in at the same time. Both users are in the same remote office. They can connect individually with no problem but if one is connected and the other tries connect also the second user gets a message the gateway is not responding. They are both running Win XP PRo SP3.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIve changed the IP address of a laptop to connect to the router with IP 192.168.15.1 but now want to change the router IP address from the defaul to another subnet, so that it is accessable with other workstations on the LAN, but I could not readily find the option to set the Ip address on the router.
I'm signed in with user admin.
I also wanted to add addiontal users. The help indicates there is a User List Add Entry option but from the Administration bar, the left hand menu option shows User Management & User Privileges options. On User Management, it is possible to change the 2 default user names, but I wanted to leve them and create new ones.
I have a RV042 and have set it up for VPN Client access using the QuickVPN client to connect my remote users. I discovered today that I cannot have two users connect in at the same time. Both users are in the same remote office. They can connect individually with no problem but if one is connected and the other tries connect also the second user gets a message the gateway is not responding. They are both running WinXPPRo SP3.
View 4 Replies View Relatedwhen I try to enable network internet connection on my computer it tells me that somebody else is using IP 192.168.0.1
View 2 Replies View Related