I was wondering if an interface numbering scheme is available for the 6509-E switch equipped with SUP-2T and includes 16Port X 10GE DFC4, 48 x 1GE SFP and RJ 45 line cards. Would like to understand:
How the slots are addressed
Interface Addressing
On board SUP-2T 10G and 1G port addressing
I was wondering if a interface numbering scheme is available for the 4900M. Configuration includes 1 x 8Port 10G and 1 x 20Port 1G modules. would like to understand How the slots are addressedInterface AddressingTwinGig interface addressing
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe are planning for the first installation of 4500 switches containing these supervisor modules. I'm trying to determine the interface numbering convention for ports on the supervisors. Our existing 4500E all have SUP6 modules with twin-gig converters - so I am familiar with the numbering conventions used on those supervisors. How does this change with the software based selection command "hw-module uplink select" used in SUP7?
View 2 Replies View Related We acquired recentlty a new Cisco 6509 with Sup-2T supervisor card
My question is the following : we have a management subnet on a Copper-based switch; we manage all equipments through this network. I planned to configure the management interface on the 6509 to connect this switch & monitor the VSS through it However, since it is a CMP interface, most of the actions (SNMP, IOS upgrade.. won't be possible through this link) Moreover, I don't think LMS would be able to get the configuration through it (except by configuring a script running "attach" command & show run
Is there something I miss or must I add another interface of the Catalyst to this network (the problem being that I have no copper line card)
I have a 6509 with SUP2 w/msfc2 at home, I am currently have dsl for internet with static IP addresses. Due to AT&T not wanting to support faster speeds in my area, I have to look at another option. All of these will be dynamic IP addresses, cable, uverse, etc.
I need to be able to enable dhcp on the wan interface so I can connect directly into one of the gig ports (either on SUP2 or 6316) or on a 10/100 port on a 6348.
I have the following image installed s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF13.bin, according to Cisco's feature tool, it is supported.
I have tried "ip address dhcp" on the interfaces but they will only accept "ip address x.x.x.x", I looked at "ip dhcp" as well and only get the option for "relay".
I would hate to have to put something else in the mix to handle the dhcp portion. I may be keeping the adsl for my mail server traffic and backup in case of an outage on the new provider. So I need to be able to track if a link is up.
Disable wrr-queue cos-map on 6509 interface?.I have the following config on one of the interfaces that i would like to remove:
[code]...
I am trying to determine a problem with flapping interface on a router not showing up in log buffer if Cisco IOS. I've included the config on the switch that pertains to the logging and can't seem to figure what is going on. The SNMP trap is being sent to our Central Management trap server and that is reporting the interface flapping but the flap doesn't show up in the log messages.
hstir1#sh int desc | inc 8/33
Gi8/33 up up
hstir1#sh int desc | inc 8/33
Gi8/33 down down
[code].....
I have just started to discover the power of EEM and am already monitoring config changes on our switches with EEM.I would like to be notified of any interface going up and possibly down. on our 6509's and 3750's This is just to be aware of anyone patching anything in.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 10Mbps connection link which I will like to reduce to 5Mbps on a 6509 switch as indicated in the config below. [code] After applying the service policy on the vlan interface, i got this "match vlan is not supported for this interface". I actually tried the rate limit command but I cant see the effect using the speedtest.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a cisco 2801 router, My ISP in which i receive my bandwidth from has assigned me a ip address/gateway etc for my FA0/0 from our Telco switch. I need to figure out how to bridge through the public ip scheme they are issuing me through FA0/1 (setting up a transparent bridge) so in example if i was givin 192.168.1.189 on a /30 network for my router (assigned to FA0/0) how to i set it up to bridge through the publics?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have been assigned to create a basic IP Addressing Scheme. The company has a single class B private address range of 172.16.11.0/16 and it needs to be divided into four subnets. They are all based on a single router.
Subnet A: 500 hosts
Subnet B: 200 hosts
Subnet C: 50 hosts
Subnet D: 20 hosts
How can I subnet them correctly and how would I make an addressing scheme for each subnet? (Host range, server, peripherals, gateway address? etc.)
I'm doing something in class where I have to define a ip addressing scheme for multiple buildings in what im guessing is a campus lan. I understand how to subnet, but was never taught how to put it into practice. I'm having trouble grasping the creation of a network for: multiple buildings(4) with 3 levels/floors each, housing around 2000 students and 400 staff, all needing to access the network in each building.The main hall houses the data center on the first of 4 levels.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have attached a pdf of an example of a FWSM configuration with shared interfaces. Now what I dont get is (please refer to the link) url...Is there any difference between the natting that they have done on page B-4 on Context A.as opposed to configuring a static NAT for processing traffic to correct context nat(inside,outside) 209.165.201.0 10.1.2.0.The other question is on page B-2 (diagram) Context A has a customer A network linked to the inside interface. Is it possible to put a default route towards that "Network 2" cloud and restrict traffic from the 6509 switch towards the context A?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have problem with traffic coming from GRE interface and going further through FWSM on the same 6509-E chassis.It's very interesting and confusing. If packets are fragmented, I can go through, however, if I use normal packets (usual ping for example) traffic goes from outside to inside and stops on it's way back.
Here is the detailed info:
WS-C6509-E with WS-SUP720-3B
FWSM HW 4.0, SW 4.1(4)
GRE is done in hardware (source is loopback interface - only one loopback per GRE tunnel).
I have used the following basic configuration to do rate limiting on a vlan interface on a 6509:
access-list 100 permit ip any any
class-map match-all ratelimit
match access-group 100
policy-map ratelimit-10Mb
class ratelimit
police 10000000 428750 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
[code]....
How do I combine the two correctly to give me a vlan port rate limited at 10Mb up and down, but still setting aside (dynamically) 2Mb for voice?
We are looking for a solution that to use Sub-interface on a routed port on 6509, instead of using a SVI on it.Are there any different when using Sub-interface?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am getting alarms on Solarwind indicating interface down on "GigabitEthernet 4/7 - Gi4/d1" and "GigabitEthernet 4/8 - Gi4/d2" from our core switch 6509.Remote login to the switch does not show the interfaces when I do the "sh run" command. Now I am at site trying to identify and diagnose this fault.Looking at the numbering on the switch, it indicates to me the card where these alarms come from is from the 'intrusion dectection module'
how I may login and identify this interfaces and rectify these alarms.
How (and is) it possible to rate limit pps on an interface (physical/logical), on a 6509-E?The porpuse is to protect from attacks which lead to very high pps, bypassing traffic rate-limits, and effecting the device's performance
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have access points deployed across several buildings that each have a different IP scheme and their own T1 line. Is it possible to configure the 5508 controller to allow these access points to use the IP scheme assigned for that particular building or will dhcp always assign an IP address to the connecting client based on the IP scheme of the building that the controller resides in?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was trying to make an Ethernet cable about 100 feet long and what I found; it was not working in non-standard color scheme. However it works fine when re-arrange its color combination into standard, (Same cable, only color difference).So, why this Color scheme is important? And what is the secret behind its color combination?This is Standard Color Scheme for Ethernet.
View 3 Replies View Relatedalthough cisco sw advisor said that the best IOS for my hardware 6509 Sup720 IOS: (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF16 suits the WiSM; And I tested it already with WiSM version 5.0 but when I've upgraded the WiSM to version 6.0 the service interface from the switch side says:
B5_Noc2_CS1(config)#int gig 4/9
% This interface cannot be modified
as the customer refuse to upgrade the switch IOS & He wants to use the latest ED WiSM sw 6.0;
I change DHCP scope to match corporate IP scheme Friday came back To discover only some stations picked up new leases from the scope.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have been facing strange issue on FWSM (6509 switch). we have created a vlan inteface for server farm on fwsm and its stop responding automatically and we need to give shut/ no shut command under that interface to back into normal .
View 11 Replies View RelatedHas anyone come across a ping cmd utility for windows with more functionality like the linux one? What I want really is sequence numbering and RTT measured with a few decimals.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow the port numbering would be on Sup 7-E and Sup 7L-E? I mean, on Sup-6E and Sup-6LE, if I used a twin-gig converter, I used ports gi3/3,gi3/4,gi3/5 and Gi3/6 [If the sup is in 3rd Slot]. I know there are now 4 ports on the Sup 7 which can either be used as Gig ports or TenGig ports. So, how will the port numbering change ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedPlatform:
cisco6509-E with FWSM
Supervisor Engine 32 PISA 8GE
sup-bootdisk:s32p3-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.ZY2.bin
command:
(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
(config)#no ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
#clear ip nat tran *
(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
%Port 14029 is being used by system
Or %Static entry in use, cannot change
But when I perform "sh ip nat tran" command,There is nothing
blank configuration for WS-C4500X-16SFP+ (Catalyst 4500-X 16 TenGig Fixed ports switch).
I would like to know how the port numbering is done (i.e. TenGig1/0/X or TenGig1/X or just Eth1/0/X ? )
Concerning the WS-X4640-CSFP-E module, I was surprised to realize when I got it that the ports are numbered 1-80 rather than 1-40. Then I saw it is actually an 80 port blade when you use half-SFP's. But we have full SFP's, so how does it do the numbering? If I use all full-SFP modules, do the even-numbered ports just go unconfigured?
View 1 Replies View RelatedAssume I had Catalyst 3560X/3750X with 24 ports. The partnumber is WS-C3560X-24P-LI would like to how is the numbering defined if the switches have a C3KX-NM-10G installed with 4 SFP-GE-L.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error:
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..
When configuring QoS on 3750s/3560s, we're mapping packets to particular interface output queues with commands such as: [code] The command to see what's actually being enqueued, dropped, etc. is: [code]
Note that these queues are numbered 0 - 3, and not 1 - 4. We've been assuming that the first queue number in the "mls qos" (i.e., 1) command maps to the first queue (i.e., 0) in the "show mls qos" command.
I have 2 x 3750 stacked, the port number of the master switch is gigabitEthernet2/0/1, slave as gigabigEtherent1/0/1.
Can I change the port numbering so that the master switch gets GigabitEthernet1/0/x?
two 6509 chassis with VSS configuration.One of those chassis have one FWSM installed and the configuration is like this:
Switch: firewall multiple-vlan-interfacesfirewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 1firewall vlan-group 1 3-5,7,8,10,200 interface Vlan200 ip address 10.50.50.1 255.255.255.252end
I am not receiving icmp replays from the fswm interfaces if i try to ping 172.20.80.1 from 10.50.50.2.I do not see any debuging info in the logsI successfully ping 10.50.50.2 from the inside networks int the cat6500, but int the network 172.20.80.0, can not ping 10.50.50.2.