Cisco WAN :: Static Routing Nothing Being Passed Through 887VA-M-k9
Nov 25, 2012
I'm having a weird issue with static routing on the Companies Cisco Router. Essentially nothing is being passed through from what I can tell. Im unable to remote in or even email the exchange server its all blocked..
My Current Config
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5327 bytes!! Last configuration change at 06:05:36 Sydney Tue Nov 27 2012! NVRAM config last updated at 06:05:53 Sydney Tue Nov 27 2012! NVRAM config last updated at 06:05:53 Sydney Tue Nov 27 2012version 15.1no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno
[code] ........
I am looking to find a command or counter to tell me if a cisco switch port on a 4510 was ever up and passed traffic. I want to shutdown all unused switchports on our access switches. But before I do that I need to make sure device is just not off or the person is away on vacation. If I do sh int interface, is there a counter I can reference.
So, I have a bit of a problem getting out Natted Cisco 7960 working with our external SIP providers behind NAT.
We have a block of IPs available to us, however when I asign a static NAT rule for the internal phone, outgoing calls are fine but incoming provides no audio.
We have no ACL blocking or anything, it's fully open to the outside world with the IP assigned to it via NAT.
Our static NAT rule for the phone:
ip nat inside source static 192.168.0.250 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
NAT is configured on the phone, with the external IP set correctly.
Also, after a while, it seems as the the registration times out or something because incoming calls no longer work.
I thought a static NAT rule would just allow full access to incoming connections to the internal IP specified? Our main router config (with unnecessary information removed):
version 15.1 no service pad service timestamps debug datetime msec
difference of CISCO887VA-K9 and CISCO887VA-SEC-K9.I thought it because of the Advanced Security and Advanced IP Licenses, but it isn't, I've got the -SEC- Version now just with the Advanced Security license. So I asking myself why I bought the more expensive CISCO887VA-SEC-K9 if I have to buy the additional Advanced IP Services licenses extra..
Is it possible to use the inbuilt 4 port switch on a Cisco 887VA ADSL router for inter Vlan routing? My plan is to configure port FA0 - 2 as Vlan 1 (default) 192.168.0.254/24 and port FA3 as Vlan 2 192.168.4.254/30. My SIP server will sit on Vlan 2 192.168.4.253/30 however remote Wan users coming through other Cisco 888 routers connected to the 887 will need to access Vlan 2 from Vlan 1, is this possible?
We are running a Cisco 887VA router for our internet access but of course the port connected to the internal network only supports 100Mbit/s. There are a few 100Mbit/s ports on the router; I was wondering whether it was possible to use more than one port to provide aggregation to get higher speed such as two ports providing 200Mbit/s? We are running Gigabit internal.
I tried the "Advanced Routing" Feature over the RV-042 V3 Dual WAN VPN Router , And the New IP Subnet i added ( 10.0.7.0 ) in the Static Routing Table does NOT Appear in the Routing Table of the Router. Please review the attached Print Screen for both the Static Routing Entry Configuration & the Routing Table of the RV-042 Router.
I have a stack of 2 x 3750X switches these are running 12.2(55)SE5. I needed to add some static IP routes and found that the ‘ip routing’ command is not supported. I came across a document that stated “On switches running the LAN base feature, static routing on VLANs is supported only with Cisco IOS Release 12.2(58)SE and later.” So I have upgraded to 12.2(58)SE2, but ‘ip routing’ is still not a valid command.
The release notes state:“On the Cisco Catalyst 3560-X and 3750-X Series, it adds support for 16 static IPv4 routes in the LAN Base image.”
I have read other posts that talk about running the ‘sdm prefer routing’ command which I have done, but I am still unable to add any routes or run the ‘ip routing’ command.
Two Cisco C2960G Switches connected with each other using an EtherChannel Trunk Ports.IOS Image has been upgraded to c2960-lanbasek9-mz. 122- 58.SE2.bin.The global command "sdm prefer lanbase-routing" has been executed to set the default template to "lanbase-routing".The global command "ip routing" has been executed to enable the ip routing.An IP route has been configured in each switch to point to each other for the static routing purpose (Please see the 2 attached configuration files) The hosts in VLAN 111 and VLAN 110 are not able to see each other even the ip static routes have been configured.May be I have misconfigured some settings but not sure what's the actual problem.
Today I installed the 1.0.2.6 Firmware on a RV180W. I only have now two problems regarding the Static DHCP support in the GUI.
1. Via the Networking > LAN (Local Network) > Static DHCP I have no buttons to Add a new static Lease. 2. Via the Networking > LAN (Local Network) > DHCP Lease Clients I can thick a Lease and click on Make Static IP. The result is an error: Operation failed.
Have they changed the poe requirements for this router? This model seems to be a seconed gen 887 with internal wireless, fanless and instead of there being a second 2 pin power socket for the poe option there is just 1 power input with the text under is saying. 'poe option requires 5a power adapter' I have purchased the 800-IL-PM=2 to delivery poe on the first 2 ports from this document [URL]While the daughter board does fit in the stand off pegs are too short and the power adapter is incompatable.
I'm trying to get an internet connection through my cisco 877va but I can't get access. I cant apply show cotroller vdsl 0 command and I can see DSL up, however, the dialer0 interface can't get access to internet. If I apply "show int dialer0 account" coomand, I get the next message: "No traffic sent or received on this interface". [code]
I need to configure a Cisco 887va router for a customer with a firewall that doesn't support PPPoA. I basically need to ensure all traffic that is recieved from the internet (ADSL connection) is NAT'd to a LAN interface so the firewall can do the specific NATing. I have the following route map and NAT rule in mind, but what I am confused about is that if the atm0 interface needs to be configured as the outside interface and vlan2 as the inside interface. How will the following work?
I'm trying to get an internet connection through my cisco 877va but I can't get access. I can see DSL up, however, the dialer0 interface can't get access to internet. Here is my configuration:
Actually I have to make a VPN between an 5520 ASA and a Cisco 887VA-K9 Router. Connected to ASA I have the outside interface, the inside-DMZ interface, the PCs interface and the VoIP interface. In the other site I will need to have a new subnet and a VoIP phone which I need to connect to the VoIP subnet in the other side in order to work with our CCM servers.I need two VPN established between ASA and 887 Router?
I have set up my network to pass ethernet (layer 2) traffic accross an adsl connection to another 887va router. this link is set up as a L2TP. I have a PC at one end of the tunnel and a web ranger that operates at layer 2 level. I can see the layer 2 traffic entering the router from the PC however it does not seem to go over the L2 tunnel to the other router.
I also need to know what debug codes I can enter to see if the data is being filtered and if so why?the debug L2TP gives the following output:
L2TP Tunnel and Session Information Total tunnels 1 sessions 1 LocTunID RemTunID Remote Name State Remote Address Sessn L2TP Class/ Count VPDN Group
I've got a brand new C887VA-W-E-K9 that is up and running on a BT VDSL connection. That side of it is fine... But the integrated AP module on it keeps reloading.. I can be on the AP console reading the config via 'sh run' and suddenly it'll be loading the OS again... There's no errors logged, no errors on the console or anything... (I also have yet to get the radio working, it starte dbefore I'd finished the config).
It doesn't seem to be anything I'm doing as if I just leave the console, it'll just sit there... reloading every few minutes... (Although sometimes it seems to stay up for longer).
The console just looks like this. WHich is taken from listing the running config and while sitting at the --more-- prompt... Bang...
interface GigabitEthernet0 description the embedded AP GigabitEthernet 0 is an internal interface connecting AP with the host router no ip address
I am struggling to get this working after spending many hours looking at it I am now completely stuck. We are upgrading from a 857W to this 887 VA-M I have some experience of IOS and the 800 series. Our 857W works perfectly using almost the same config. Our situation is that the router will sit in front of our firewall and act essentially as a simple router passing everything through to our Firewall. Nat is done at the Firewall.
We currently have the following configuration that seems to connect the the ISP fine but I cannot connect to the vlan2 port on the switch the firewall cannot connect to he internet or route anything via the Vlan2 port no pings etc.. I am using Fast Ethernet 0 as the Vlan2 port and the rest are V LAN 1 with a local network address to allow me to connect a laptop.
We have a block of static IP addresses, the base of which is assigned to the V LAN 2 interface and used by Dialer 0 as IP Unnumbered. Config below.
4590 out of 262136 bytes ! Last configuration change at 17:42:06 UTC Thu Jan 3 2013 ! NVRAM config last updated at 17:43:00 UTC Thu Jan 3 2013 ! NVRAM config last updated at 17:43:00 UTC Thu Jan 3 2013 [ code].....
I'm facing an issue since 2 month now , no one is able to tell me what's going on. The line goes down suddently for 2 or 3 minutes and this happens everyday at the same range (~2 or 3 hours) of time . I don't have any scheduled task to cause this. ISP in his side has also made some tshoot but found nothing and is convinced that the problem is coming from our side :
Configuring static routing, how can i get a ping to go through a diff. route depending which host pinged? I want to ping host B from host A. Host A is connected to router1, which is connected to 2 other routers, router2 and router3. On the other end, routers 2 & 3 meet router4. Like a diamond topology. So basically routers 2 & 3 lead to the same place, router4, which is connected to host B. I need to configure static routing so that when I ping host B from A, both ping request and ping reply go through router1, 2, 4, host B, and back. THEN the part I dont understand, doing it the other way around: When I ping host A from host B, how can I get both ping request and ping reply to go through router4, THEN THROUGH ROUTER 3, then router1, then A, and back again to host B?
We have a 887VA and a dns/web/mail/ftp server behind (below address 192.168.99.100).
first problem I forwarded the necessary ports to the server address, but now the domain became invisible and all the above servers stops to respond.
second problem whenconfiguring a fixed ip addres on a PC with GW and DNS server the 887VA address no internet connection possible, but when put instead the route address in the dns the ISP dns address internet comes back.
Put this server on DMZ, so all services will be available from the outside? forth how to connect the route remotely (with putty)
This site is my only hope to succeed one day to manage this "black" box successfully. Below the running conf
! No configuration change since last restart version 15.1 no service pad
I have a adsl setup from my ISP (TDC) and I would like to use my 887va as modem instead of the supplied Motorola Modem.I have the technical info on the connection: VPI = 0, VCI = 101 and RFC1483 AAL5snap. I have supplied the 887VA with an IP address on VLAN1. What is the right direction in terms of access-lists, dialer interfaces, routing etc.I have tried serveral guides on Cisco pages but have not managed to even ping google from my 887va.
I have cisco router 887VA.Question is when i connect that WAN port ( eth0) with any switch or laptop/pc i do not see the port in up state. What can be the reason.I have done "no shutdown " on interface level and there is no configuration on interface except the IP address , but it show " up down "state even the port is connected to some device. ( Is the port is faulty or some other reason).As per my concept it should show up state when we connect to some device ( Like router / switch / laptop).