RT1 is RR client of RT2, we run label BGP among RT1, RT2 and RT3; MPLS LDP is OK; RT1 network route 192.168.1.18/32 with MPLS-label 4123, we hope RT2 propagate it to RT3 by its address 192.168.8.2 and swap MPLS-label, however, RT2 just propagate it without any changing(192.168.1.18/32 nexthop 192.168.8.1).
We need to rename our 4404 Wireless LAN Controllers. Would like to know if renaming via the GUI (change name in the Controller / General tab and then Apply) will cause the WLC to reload. Also wondering about the best way to push the name change to the APs (High Availability) - we are not using WCS.
My internet provider give me 600kbps which is 0.6mbps i believe Wireless B's maximum speed is 11mbps N's is 300-450.Will I have any diffenece on internet speed between b and n? I use telus from vancouver they say I have 6mbps speed internet.
Ok so this morning I found out that I had a running sql server that I did not know of. I think I might of got it with one of my development kits since I program with python, c# and java.Would I have got it from recently installed software.Also a big worry would it affect my internet and usage and will it affect my computers speed.
I am planning to implement RMON remote monitoring in my switch will it any huge effect on CPU utlization .Whether it is resource specific .
I am planning to monitor bandwidth utilization of all the ports in my lan using RMON . Is there any alternative o monitor bandwidth utilization ?I am using LMS 4.2
I have removed all port forwarding and enabled DMZ? I made sure the DMZ IP matches my internal IP. DMZ still not taking effect. One thing I noticed is that when I visited [URL] it showed a different IP then what was assigned to my router itself.
Modem > Linksys Wireless > Computer
Should the Linksys Wireless be in gateway or router mode?
I just update my cisco 7609 to Version 12.2(33)SRD6. I encounter a strange problem with this version, everytime i change BGP policy ( input or output ) this will take effect immediately without "clear ip bgp neighbor <address> soft". Are there anyway not to take BGP policy affect unless command "clear ip bgp neighbor <> soft" ?
What are the possible effects of assigning an invalid address like 172.22.0.0 255.255.255.252 to a router interface. The 1841 router accepted the address?
Does ip default-gateway have any effect on a L3 device such as a 2811 router? I always thought that on a L3 device the default route would supersede any such command assuming it is accepted.
We have a client device that cannot be reached for managment directly and wanted to add that statment only if it might work.
I have Win 7 and Win 8 dual booting on my brand new Dell Vostro laptop. The wireless works beautifully while using Win 7, but when I switch to Win 8... the actual Fn+F2 wireless switch has no effect whatsoever! So I know the machine is OK, the network is OK, but what could be making the machine act differently under Windows 8? Device manager and details say the driver is up to date.. What do I look for next?? I don't think I'm going to be able to get a call through to Microsoft!!
I have a new catalyst 2960,and i want to enable DHCP SNOOPING,but,it doesn't work,the server is stilling offert addresses IP and it's not connected in a trusted port,the schema is very simple:1 switch catalyst 2960 PST-S,1 server dhcp and 1 pc client,the PC and the server are in VLAN 10,DHCP SNOOPING is enabled in all ports and no port is trusted,but the client get addresse IP after retyping ipconfig /release and ipconfig /renew in dos commande.the configuration and the version of the switch are in the file attached.I tested the same configuration in a catalyst C3560-24PS and DHCP SNOOPING work normally,i tested in other catalyst 2960-PST-S,but the same probléme:DHCP SNOOPING without effect,the commands typed is:
We have a RV016 load balancing between two broadband WAN connections. On protocols that are sensitive to a change in IP address such as ssh and https, if the client connection goes inactive for a short time (sometimes as short as 10 seconds), the RV016 often changes WAN connection as part of its "load balancing" feature. Most protocols do not even notice, but the more sensitive protocols do and often lock a session or timeout the session which is not a good thing.
We have been able to bind these sensitive protcolols to a particular WAN port but (in our minds) this is not an "ideal" situation. In fact I would consider this to be a broken "load balancing" solution and should be fixed.
determine whether I have QoS properly setup on my router, and why the rules do not appear to be taking effect.ISSUE We have a couple of laptops, smartphones, and a Wii on our home network. One device, my roommate's laptop, is a real bandwidth hog. It's connected (via internet, not VPN) to a work server and is frequently downloading and syncing large datafiles and media files.Unfortunately, when that laptop is downloading the other devices either cannot connect to the internet without timing out, or is VERY slow, for example pulling up websites like google.com. When that laptop is offline, everything works fine. It seemed like enabling QoS would resolve our problem.\
SETUPLinksys E1000, latest firmware (v2.1.02), using WPA2-Personal security.
We first tried enabling QoS and setting the MAC address of the downloading laptop to "low" priority and all others to "medium". No luck - the downloading laptop still seems to be hoarding the bandwidth.We also tried adding the download application to the list and setting the port to "low". Still no luck.We added a new application called "web" and set port 80-81 to "high", but that didn't work.We then disabled WMM support. No dice. The other devices still can't connect while my roommatte's laptop is syncing.We've fiddled around with the settings a bit, but no matter what, it looks like the QoS rules are not being applied.And is it acceptable to have multiple categories (MAC and application) in the QoS rules?
I have desktop and two laptops. I have DSL connected with my desktop only. If I'm gonna install E200 so I can use my laptops in internet, wouldn't it effect my dsl connection in my desktop?
I'm trying to test fast roaming using a Cisco 2100 Series controller and 2 1140 APs. The initial authentication succeeds fine and the wireless connection works ok using WPA2+CCKM and LEAP with a Cisco ACS radius server.The problem is that the client does not attempt to preauthenticate with the other AP because the RSN Capabilities IE in the AP beacons and probe responses do not set the RSN Preauthentication capable bit. I can't figure out what it takes to get the APs to indicate to clients that it can do preauthentication. I'm been crawling through all the documentation I can find, to no avail.
We are about to share a 10 MBit ISP connection with 2 others companies, and they are going to split the bill up into 3,3 and 4 Mbit, so we where thinking that we could setup a switch before their and ours router and provide them with a static IP from our ISP. But is it possible to set a bandwidth limit on the ports of a Cisco Catalyst 2960-8TC, so that we can set a limit of 3,3 and 4 on 3 ports.
I want to PAT my project of WLAN and i attached the document, how I create the Testing Criteria of the said scenarios, PAT document includes WCS 7.0, WLC 5508, MSE 3310, Cisco AP 3502e and ACS 4.2.
I have 7 POE switches that have ESI IP phones attached. I have two VLANS, 1 and 2. VLAN 2 is used for voice and is defined in each switch.The ESI IP phones connect to my POE switch ports and the pc attaches through the ESI IP phone.
I have had voice quality issue between floors in my building. Talking to others on my floor via the IP phone, there are no voice quality issues. [code]
I am looking at a config on a 5550 FW, and am trying to make sense of the syntax of the following rules. I have been to the Cisco site, but can't find much on the syntax.
I currently use a device called the Access Enforcer which runs OpenBSD. I have 3 stable, working VPN tunnel's where the other side's device is a Cisco ASA 5520 or 5540. I was setting up my 4th VPN where the other side used a Cisco ASA 5520 and ran into issue's. The Cisco side can bring up the tunnel. Once the tunnel is up each side can talk to the other side. However, when the tunnel is dropped, the OpenBSD side cannot bring up the tunnel. The error received is on the OpenBSD device is "isakmpd[29581]: transport_send_messages: giving up on exchange from-XX.X.X.0/24-to-XX.XXX.XXX.240, no response from peer XX.XX.XXX.141:4500". I have been trying to figure this out for weeks now and can't seem to find the cause.
I am trying to configure a 3750G that has been sitting on the shelf for several months and am getting the following error -
% Error: Unable to create flash:/microcode_update% Error: It must not already exist
Normally, getting an error during POST isnt a good thing. My first thought was that flash was corrupted or flagged RO somehow. I did fsck flash: with no change. I next tried fsck /test flash:. It tested 77 blocks and performed 0 erasures. It had been running for about 15 minutes with no problems reported so far. Multiple reboots of the switch still report the same error.
I have reviewed the history of what I have done on this switch and finally think I found the problem. I noticed a microcode_update directory that I am not used to see on a 3750. Deleted the directory using the rmdir command and rebooted the switch. On reboot, I noticed that a front_end/ directory was listed as being created as well as fe_type_1 and fe_type_2 were created. The switch now boots up without any errors.
I have two Cisco Aironets 1401 connected to a Cisco Catalyst 3560 Switch. When users log onto the Wifi the APs authenticate with a Freeradius that then authenticates with LDAP.
Recently users have been getting kicked off of the network but I'm not sure why.If so how do I set these APs to roam with my setupd?For all I know there could be an issue with the switch I'm just not sure where to start when it comes to troubleshooting this issue.
Guys I am using a cisco 2911 router with three interfaces: Gi0/0 connected through a switch to all my servers and Gi0/2 which will connect to another server, and Gi0/1 is my outside interface connecting through a switch to two ISP's.I have webservers and Terminal servers/File Servers with 10.0.0.0 network address connected throught My Gi0/0 interface.Now I want to implement a Cisco Advanced firewall for security on my router using CCP.I want the firewall to work such that it allows external users to access the servers on Gi0/0 through ports 0,23,25,20,21,53, 110,3389. and to access the SIP server on Gi0/2. My issue is can i just create two DMZ's for both interface Gi0/0 and Gi0/2 without creating an inside zone and Gi0/1 as outside zone as my internal traffic is mostly server based and the users connect remotely through terminal server to access resourcess using RDP, secondly how do I open the relevant ports.I have checked alot and all I have seen is just basic process on using the wizard I have no idea how to go about this issue.
I bought a new cisco 3550 switch to prepare for my Cisco certification prepration. Actually i dont know how to connect the cisco switch to a laptop with only usb ports....... earlier i used to do my practise using Cisco packet tracer but i think for CCNP switch that is not enough thats y i bought second hand switch. how can i connect that switch with my toshiba laptop which has only USB ports. do i need to buy some sort of convertor or other hardware. And if so what does u call it and how much does it cost?
I am struggling to have my PPTP traffic to get routed through NAT to reach other Server LAN segment. I am using Cisco 2921 router as a PPTP server.This Cisco 2921 router is working as PPTP server and doing NAT also to reach Server LAN segment (LAN-B).My problem is after PPTP connection establishes I cannot reach any of the LAN segment, but after connecting PPTP I can browse Internet without any issue, but none of the LAN element is reachable. Please have a look on the configuration I am posting 2921 router configuration to suggest something, I have also attached the network setup for better understanding…Just to update Clients in LAN-A can access Internet as well as servers (LAN-B). [code]
I would like to know the IOS which supports :ACL Support for Filtering on TTL Value feature on my Cisco 7600 device. I check on cisco and found the Cisco 12.4T release but this software doesn't fit onto my chasis. which software should I upgrade to on my cisco 7600 to have this feature.
I have a cisco router I would like to reset the password for. Its the first password that is entered. for exampleUser access verificationPassword:I have changed the en password using this command:router(config)#enable secret cisco123 <---example password
I finally got the Site to Site Vpn from our corporate to remote site. Is there a way to connect a cisco phone over that network. Since both Voice Vlans are exempt from acl I would imagine all traffic is clear to go accross? and if so I just have to set the phone to our tftp/ccme. Will that work.
I want to create a user who only has access to "router>" prompt on the CLI. this user should not be able to do enable command and by no other means be able to go to global configuration mode. I know the command router(conf t)# username ABC privilege 1 password ABCPASS, but even with this command, this user gets privilege 15 access.
