I have a STORCENTER IX2-200 CLOUD EDITION in my office with 3 machines hooked up via the router. I cant seem to access users when I enable the security. If i disable security i can get in. This is happening on Windows XP and 7. I've tried Iomega support and it all has to be done via email which is annoying.If i enable security I get the following windows error: \iomegakate is not accessible. you miht not have permission to use this network resource. access is denied.all the machines are logged on as administrator. I did fix this problem although only for a few hours after speaking to Iomega. They advised to use the Net Use command and delete all connections. Ive forgotten what it was now as they remote accessed in.
I have a Iomega Prestige hard drive of 2TB connected to my Linksys E3000 router.I have logged into the router with an admin account, yet I am unable to delete most files. When I try to delete something I get the following error.When I click "Try Again" the file seems to be gone, but it has actually just become invisible, it's still there.I've tried to use Take Ownership, but that just gives an error "Access denied"according to the router settings I should have read and write permissions.When I connect the drive directly to my PC there are no issues.
So I am on my second HDD with Iomega. I am thinking now that this is a router problem rather than a HDD problem. I have a 1TB Iomega home media network drive, eversince I bought my router and began using it I have been unable to use my HDD. It is hard wired to the router via RJ-45 cable and both units have been reset and powered up in about every order you can imagine. I have reset factory defaults on the router and made security changes to ensure there was nothing blocking that port. I am at wits end. I cannot connect to the HDD and the drive flashes yellow and blue indicating it cannot estabilsh or receive an IP address from the router.
I'm trying to set up an Iomega Home Media Network Cloud NAS and I'm having problems with opening ports 50500-50599. I have opened port 80 and 443 successfully and included the above port range above as well, but when I check it on www.yougetsignal.com the ports 50500-50599 are still closed. I even tried to split the range in two parts, and still no success. I have been in contact with my ISP and confirmed they do not block any ports in the 50500-50599 range and that the cable modem (a Motorola SBV5120) is operating in Bridge Mode.
I have a 1Tb Iomega home media network drive. It normally connects via the network to all my machines (iMac osx, eee pc W7, ubuntu 10). But, something has happened, so now I can see the folders on the network drive but when I click on it (photos, videos etc), it says Windows cannot access \Iomega-0E10FDmovies
Error code: 0x80070043 The network name cannot be found
I have tried disabling the firewall in the router and the W7 eee pc, but nothing has worked.
I had an Iomega 1TB External Hard Drive connected to my E4200 router. I had shares confgured and they were properly running on the network.
As of yesterday, this all stopped working. The router does not see the drive; it is as though it is not plugged in.
I rebooted the router and it still does not work. I've connected the hard drive directly to my PC to verify that it works there, and it does. The router is running Ver.1.0.03 (Build 14) of firmware (the latest).
Based on my diagram, my computer A (192.168.100.11) can ping and access my computer B (192.168.10.14). But, when i'm home and i use remote access vpn (192.168.200.x) in cisco asa 5520 to connect to my computer A is okay. But, when i try to ping my computer B is not okay. I already do the exemption for 192.168.100.x and 192.168.10.x in nat rules for inside interface (192.168.100.2) ...
Should i put routing from outside 1.1.1.2 to 192.168.10.x by using 192.168.100.1 as a gateway?
got myself the Netgear internal PCI wifi adapter today & it works just fine on my Windows XP SP3 desktop.
The only problem I have is the question of restricting access to kids @ home. If it was an external USB adapter, I could have just taken it away but the concern is the device being an internal & always available one. The user configuration on the PC is such that there is 1 main administrator (The actual windows "administrator" account) that no one uses. Apart from that,
- 1 user with admin privileges (me)
- 1 limited account for the kid
- 1 admin privilege account for the kid again (for purposes like installation of games which require an admin account as mandatory)
I would like for the wifi PCI card to work only when I login to my account. There must be someway by which I could disable the device or make the internet inaccesible in the other accounts,, (but pls bear that 1 of the account that the kid uses also has admin privilege)
I tried disabling the device from control panel but in vain.. (tried something like the sys admins do in corporates ..) disabling the usb ports on the PC's in my office..!
I want to create a website but only allow a certain user or group of users access to that website. Assuming that user or users will be from the same location, and likely the same static IP, can I throw a firewall between my internet connection and web server and only allow that specific IP address access to my web server by a rule?If there is a better way to handle that,
I currently set up two LAN networks. But one of them (Router 2) will be open (no password). Will this create a security compromise? Can the Router 2 Users access information of users of Router 1?
Modem WAN > Router 1 WAN Router 1 LAN > Router 2 WAN
The router 1 and 2 are broadcasting different networks and SSID.Is there any setting that I need to change, or this configuration is perfectly safe? both of them have DHCP enabled.
got myself the Netgear internal PCI wifi adapter today & it works just fine on my Windows XP SP3 desktop.
The only problem I have is the question of restricting complete internet access to kids @ home. If it was an external USB adapter, I could have just taken it away but the concern is the device being an internal & always available one.
The user configuration on the PC is such that there is 1 main administrator (The actual windows "administrator" account) that no one uses. Apart from that,
- 1 user with admin privileges (me)
- 1 limited account for the kid
- 1 admin privilege account for the kid again (for purposes like installation of games which require an admin account as mandatory)
I would like for the wifi PCI card to work only when I login to my user account. There must be someway by which I could disable the device or make the internet inaccessible in the other accounts,, (but pls bear that 1 of the account that the kid uses also has admin privilege)
I tried disabling the device from control panel but in vain.. (tried something like the sys admins do in corporates ..) disabling the usb ports on the PC's in my office..!
I have a customer with an ASA5510. We have an SSL VPN (tunnel-based, or "SVC") that we use for remote access. That works great.They want to be able to use this same functionality, but add users who will not have the full access that the current SSL VPN users have. So in other words we currently have a small group of users who get full access to the LAN. Then they want to have a second group of users who will only have access to certain nodes.I'm wondering if there's some way to do this using LDAP between the firewall and the Radius server? The user gets put in a different tunnel group depending on what the FW learns from the server?We only have the Anyconnect Essentials license, so unfortunately we can't do a clientless SSL VPN, which otherwise might work well here.
restricting access to internet for roughly 20 users. Right now we are connected using broadbandand using dhcp as assigned by common switch. All pc's are in a common workgroup. recommend me the hardware / software required to restrict this access.
1. Will I require a router as well as a switch ? or should I simply get a new switch ( for more then 20 users ) This would mean static ip for all users.
2. My idea is to create a AD server and use websense on it so that users who require internet access can still open internet sites but will be restricted through websense proxy.
I configured a dynamic vpn(easy vpn) in a cisco isr. But the vpn clients cannot access any of the lan devices. VPN pool is 10.0.0.1- 10.0.0.20 & internal netwrk add is 172.17.x.x. I tried to disable zone based firewall but no resultout[CODE]
I have an ASA 5505. I have configured Remote Access VPN so that users can connect to VPN and access my main VLAN (Inside). I would like to secure it so that when a user VPN's in, they are only allowed access to the HVAC vlan (Vlan 2) as seen in my configuration. Please note there is also a LAN- 2- LAN VPN which has been configured as well.
I just configure an ASA 5520, here is the config (the ip address of outside network if going to change from private direccion by reason security).
The problem that I have is the users can access to the web site through the public´s ip address but they do not can access through by name. We review all the config on the server DNS and with the command NSLOOKUP we can see that work fine. The client think that the asa is blocked the connnection.
I've got a windows server 2003 running a big application (sage1000) but suddenly it seems that users cannot access the server by unc path.i've also test to access \server on the server itself doesen't work.
I was trying to access some computers in network via remote desktop. All those computers had been used by other staffs.What I noticed that, for some computers I can access via remote desktop by forcing them to log off (people who were using the computers)But for some computers, I got the message similar to "user is currently logged onto the computer, you are not allowed to connect"I want to force them too and access these computers. How I can do it?
we have a ASA 5510 firewall and i have created remote vpn user who connects the internal network via vpn any connect after connecting i want him to only access his internal PC via rdp and not access other internal website or shared folders without connecting to the RDP however now he can access the internal website wihtout connecting to RDP?
I need a way to block MAC OS X users connecting remotely to our coporate users over VPN. I know there is an option to block connections based on VPN client Version, but cant find a way to block users based on operating system.
We use Cisco ASA 5510 firewals one with v8.2(1) and other with v7.2(3). I need to do on both firewalls. They are both at diffrent sites.
I have a base config of AnyConnect VPN below, however the ASA 8.3.1 code has deprecated some commands and the VPN/NAT/FW rule syntax is quite different. Can som point out what's missing from the pertinent config below that prevents the VPN Pool from accessing the internal LAN?
The Core LAN router is 1.2.3.1.
! ASA Version 8.3(1) ! interface Ethernet0/0 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address 1.2.3.2 255.255.255.0
The goal is to add a 2801 router between a DSL modem and a switch and obviously still access the internet. I connected and configured as explained below and the results are:
- I am able to ping internet addresses from the 2801 router - I am not able to ping internet addresses from userlaptop but I am able to ping LAN gateway (192.168.254.254)
I cannot understand why the internet requests from the user laptopuser are not routed to the internet but the router itself can access the internet.
Since we upgraded our ASA from 8.3 to 8.4(4), VPN users cannot access resources. This worked fine until the appliances were upgraded. We get the message:
We have three locations, Seattle, LA and NJ. All the users need to go through the proxy server in NJ if they need to access to internet. We use the port 3128 on the proxy server for accessing the internet. We implement the QoS on the WAN for those three locations. For the internet acces, we configure the port 3128 as the NBAR and classify it as the lower priority.
The issue is...we want to have the users access to the URL as high priority, and the other web sites are still set as the lower priority. Are there any ways to accomodate it?
We have a high availability pair of ASA 5510's in Data Centre where we have configured remote access to allow users log in via SSL VPN, now we want to add further security to our environment we are adding endpoint assessment licenses...the question I have would I need two sets of the license ASA-ADV-END-SEC ?
I learned the hardway before with ASA SSL VPN licenses breaking other failover pair as it needed identical licenses on both units! Will I need 2 separate license sets to keep my firewalls in a HA pair?
I have configured and tested an ASA-5505 that will be deployed at a customer's home. The ISP cable modem will connect to the E0 (outside) interface of the ASA. All other interfaces on the ASA are configured for the inside network 192.168.5.0/24. I have created a VPN site-to-site tunnel between this ASA and the UC540 to allow 192.168.5.0/24 subnet access to the internal networks on the UC540.
The user has requested that all the network devices used by the rest of the family will only need to connect to the Internet. They will not need access to the VPN tunnel and they will not need access to the computers on the 192.168.5.0/24 inside network. I was planning on performing the following tasks to get this to work.
Pix 515e 6.3.4..A web server on our DMZ is exposed for external access.There is an "A" record (webserver.yyy) on a public DNS for this public IP.This works fine for external users. url..Now I have been asked to allowed our LAN user to access the same link and I CANNOT CREATE AN INTERNAL DNS RECORD TO TAKE CARE OF THIS, which means when our internal users access that link, the request goes out of OUTSIDE interface with a NAT overloaded address(111.111.111.2) that is in the same subnet as the URL is trying to resolve. Once it knows the IP address thru DNS resolution tries to comes back in thru the same Interface(OUTSIDE) to hit the web server in the DMZ and is not able to.
1- Where does the request from an internal user to hit url is dropped?
2- what can be done to allow this type of connectivity in the PIX 515e device?
