A SRP 527W is responsible for the data network in my office. But I am not able to access it. I use traceroute to confirm its IP address is “10.0.0.138”. I am not able to access / open 10.0.0.138 with my web browser. I even can not access the same address with telnet. So is there any solution to access the SRP 527W?
Our SRP527W is working - internet on and SIP phones on but I cannot access the Web interface anymore. When I try to login from any of the machines around I get a "not responding" message.
Before I get to the stage where I have to reset the whole thing and re-do the configuration completely ? I tried powering off and powering on as well as restarting all the switches etc... but I get the same result.
I recently ( three days ago ) purchased a SRP 527w and have been using it in a mixed Mac/Windows network. The setup is currently primarily using defaults apart from enabling logging. While I was still able to access the internet with some applications, accessing web content appears to have blocked after approximately 48 hours uptime.
No web pages using port 80 were available and that included the router web interface. The router would respond to ping only.
On a different note. I have to say that I find it very strange that the supplied documentation doesn't advise setting up the router using the admin login. It was only after reading one of the comments on this site that I was alerted to this security problem. I also find it rather annoying that I appear to have to purchase additional support merely to be able to download firmware updates which are designed to give the device improved functionality.
I spent three days trying to get the DMZ function in my newly purchased SRP 527w Small Business Router to work at no avail.All I want is for the router to place the 192.168.1.200 IP/Machine in the DMZ.I have configured the ports in the router as TRUSTED and there are no other conflicting rules but it doesn't work still.I tried upgrading to the latest firmware "SRP520W-1.1.24" and it didn't work either.
Just wanting to know if there is a way to disable unused LAN interfaces of these Cisco 527W routers. Looking through the configuration interface it doesnt seem to have an option for this. Also I am having trouble logging into the router via SSH or Telent . When I put the password in it says "access denied" . But password works for the web interface..
at our office we've recently upgrade from a old consumer-grade linksys wag200g modem/router/ap to the Cisco SRP527w. The Cisco is suffering from very frequent ADSL disconnections. These disconnections happens when there is some traffic to the internet and they seem to don't affect the LAN routing: on the weekends there are no disconnections at all while during the working hours there may be disconnections every FEW MINUTES making this router unusable. Often these disconnections force us to do a full reboot of the router.
Firmare version is SRP520W-1.1.19, the latest. ADSL line is a 6Mbps/640kbps. Noise margin is about 11dB for downstream and 20dB for upstream. No voice line is used and therefore they are both disabled. 2 wireless network are active. The old linksys was (and is) working correctly, no adsl disconnections at all. Never.
As a raw test it is handy for us to ping externally the WAN port of the SRP 527W. How we configure the SRP 527W to allow this? FYI we have the inbulit SRP firewall enabled.
I have a pair of SRP-527W routers running latest firmware V 1.01.26. Everthing works fine. Except.... Have purchased a ZTE MF112 usb dongle as backup to the ADSL but router refuses to recognise it. In mobile network status shows as "Unable to Detect USB Mobile Modem".
Have tried a second dongle of the same type, cold reboot of router etc... but nothing. It is supposed to be supported in this release of firmware...?
we are trying to configure one to one NAT translations on a Cisco 527W-U, but are having some problems. We are running firmware version 1.2.4 (003) on the 527.
The DSL line is assigned with a /29 address range x.x.x.64 /29?
The DSL WAN interface picks up x.x.x.65 /32 from the Radius server. We are using the default private IP address range 192.168.15.0 /24 on the LAN (VLAN1), and can get to the internet ok with a PC connected to the LAN.
However when we try to set up a public IP address in the same range (eg x.x.x.66 /29) on VLAN1 (with x.x.x.67 on the PC) it will not connect. (won't allow us to configure an address from the same range as the WAN on a new VLAN interface).
we would want to be able to do one to one NAT translations eg x.x.x.66 on the outside to 192.168.15.2 inside, x.x.x.67 outside to 192.168.15.3 inside etc, but this will not either. We have tried this on a normal IOS router (887) and it worked ok. We have also tried the same on a small DSL router / modem product similar to the 527 from another manufacturer and it worked ok on that, but we wanted it to be able to work on the 527.
We have tried the NAT bypass feature without any success, reading several other discussion forums on this website leads me to believe that one to one NAT is not supported on this equipment at the moment, or at least not at the current firmware release.
One work around would be to just assign a /32 to the WAN interface on the DSL and route statically to a different routed subnet configured on the LAN, however we were wanting to avoid having to do that if possible.
We have a Cisco SRP 527W router that was not showing up on the LAN. so we tried a Factory Default reset but it seems to be dead.
The power light is flashing constantly,the 4 LAN light are constantly on,the DSL Data light comes on for 1 sec when device is powered up.
i have tried connecting directly to a PC, the NIC reports as network cable unplugged.i have tried the (power on device, hold down reset button, power of after 30 sec, power on after 5 sec, release reset button after 5 sec) but still "network cable unplugged".
the firmware flash utility will not find the NIC the device is connected to.the router is less than a year old, is there a fix or is it a warranty replacement ?
I have recently acquired one of these routers. I thought, being a Cisco product, it would be the bee's knees. It is not. After finally getting the network set up - no mean feat, although I do not claim any expertise, but had to resort to some other network management software to finally get it all running - the router drops either the WAN connection or the wireless connection many times a day. The laptops often show as being connected to the network/router, but are unable to access either the internet, or the router via the browser. Re-booting the router is the fix, but, hey, I can achieve that sort of performance with any old $20 router - none of my old Net gear routers was this troublesome.
The permanent fix would seem to be a firmware upgrade, but guess what? The only options available under the "Administration" tab are time setting and switch settings - no firmware upgrade. The supplied firmware is 1.01.09(001) Apr 7 2010. Why these products are supplied, as new, without the latest firmware installed beats me, but there you go.
The router recognizes the Sierra 312U modem but does not connect to Telstra. The modem is on a monthly plan (not pre-paid) and I have tried APN settings such as internet.telstra and internet.bigpond. The configuration is set to manual and the correct user id and password have been entered. explain the "daemon.err rc: start -1 port.... fail (-8)" in the log? 312U sierra model supposed to be compatible with SRP500s. Any other settings I should try?
I have a Cisco 527w which we are wanting to deploy to our remote sites however i've found a bug. We use ADSL with an IPsec tunnel as primary and 3G APN for failover . When the ADSL goes down the route via the IPSec tunnel remains and i am unable to route the traffic via the APN backup without disabling the VPN tunnel .
We have recently purchased a Cisco Small Business Pro SRP 527W router, all seems good and it is running smoothly, no disconnections or sync issues like our last router. However, after a certain amount of time the web management interface is unavailable through the browser (accessing it via 192.168.1.254 or the alternative we set-up 1.1.1.1) It is totally unavailable and timeouts in the browser yet there is still internet access and network is still alive. The web management interface was accessible before though and the only solution I have been able to do to access it again is to reboot this router.Could it be possible that because port 80 is forwarded to a different IP it interferes with the Web management interface? And how wcould the interface port access be changed?
I have just installed an SRP 527w and it's basic operation is working fine. However, the ISP has allocated (and set up routing for) a range of 16 additional static addresses to the link that I now wish to configure and use, but I am having problems. Details are as follows (ip addresses are fictitious): [code]Extra ip range Netmask: 255.255.255.240From what I understand, these are added as subinterfaces which are bridged off the main WAN interface. However, when I try to add a subinterface by specifying (say) I get an error when saving : [code] The error states "IP Address and Gateway cannot be the same as the netmask".
I've got a site that has a Cisco 887 with a static ip and a branch office with a SRP527W connect to a 3G Dongle (Dynamic IP Address). Is it at all possible to do some sort of IPSec Site to Site VPN so that both lans can communicate with eachother? I would assume that either DDNS would need to be configured or the SRP527W would need to be the initiator.
The other option would be to replace the SRP527W with a Cisco 881w/ 3G and do a DMVPN between the two but was hoping I could reuse the current hardware first.
Setup N600 DB as an access point using the most recent firmware,3.03.12? Once I do I'm not able to access the dashboard even through I enabled the remote management option.
I am trying to setup internet access and intranet access using two cards per PC. I don't have sever software and I want to be able to share files between several machines. I have two routers. One that connects to cable modem and one that connects to intranet side. I have assigned different static ip addresses to both cards.
I have an n600 ( F9K1102 v1 , firmware 1.00.09 ). My ISP provides my main router for my network, but I want to use the N600 as an access point, I have activated the "Use as Access Point" feature.Is it possible to still utilize the Guest Access feature in this case?
I am trying to find an effective way to extend the wireless signal across our home. I have tried various different solutions. Currently, I have an e4200 primary router that is cascaded with two additional e1500 routers that have been configured as access points. The Linksys support team hosted my computer and configured the devices. The e1500 routers are connected via ethernet wires running through the walls. And, this seems to be working well. Here's my question. The e1500 routers are configured with different SSID names, which Linksys advised was required to avoid conflicts in communications from the three router devices. Is there any way to configure this set up or something similar so that the entire wireless network has the same SSID and is seamless. In the current configuration, I have to specifically connect to the primary router or one of the two access points.
I had WRT54G2 and recently switched to an RV120W. I have an Internet accessible camera system connected to my router. Before, this worked fine... there is a dns service (DynDNS.com) that is configured as part of the camera setup. I would then just enter [URL] and I would connect to the cameras. I install the new router (RV120W) and I can no longer connect to the cameras. I do not recall any configuring that I had to perform on the old router.
why the RV120W isn't letting me get to the cameras?
We have 2 sites connected thru 2 RV220W routers via VPN and most things are working fine. I have noticed however, that any device that has a web interface, i.e. our Sharp Copier and our Freenas server, is inaccessible. The page tries to come up but then I get the Cisco "server is down" page generated by the RV220W.
I can pull up the web interface pages if I use a machine on the local LAN but not on any machine across the VPN. The only commonality I can think of is the RV220W blocking that traffic for some reason..
After a few months of trouble-free ... the Cisco WRVS4400N V2 stopped working. i have tried to reset by holding the reset button for 30 seconds ... but nothing changes the red DIAG light remains on at all times
i have also tried two different versions of the Firmware Rescue Utility but all i get is "unable to scan"
Is it possible to set up an RV110W to limit access to only specified websites according to a schedule? I can block access to specific sites using the Internet Access Policy settings under Firewall, but I can't figure out a successful way to block access to all sites except those specified. I also tried establishing access rules but that did not work either.
I have been trying to resolve this issue with only allow facebook access throug the content filter between 12pm and 1 pm. However The settings never seem to take. Is this a bug in the system? If I start the filtering from 1300 to 1200 that should allow facebook to be accessible only on lunch.
We recently moved our network over to RV082 router and its working great, well now we want to take advantage of VPN for our sales staff.
I was able to setup the VPN and using a PC at a remote office I can launch the quick connect and it connects right away, RV0 even shows the user connected. However the user cannot ping anything on our network via name or IP, connect to any resources, etc...
My understanding was when the client VPN would connect the user would get an IP from DHCP (this is on our Server 2008 DC) and they would be using that address, but when I run IPCONFIG on the client PC they just have there standard IP from remote office.
Trying to configure an SRP527 to work in conjunction with a 3560G switch.My local subnet on the 3560 is 172.23.x.x.The subnet on SRP527 is 192.168.x.x Every thing can ping each other, except I just cannot get any internet access from 172.x through 192.x and out..? Does the SRP527 support this?
I am connected with qvpn, I can log in to the router bios remotely, but when I try to map the network drive from my remote location it does not work.I can detect the machine on the network, but it will not go further and tells me that "said IP was found but could not locate G". Does this mean it is behind a firewall on server side and that I need to create a rule to allow the incoming traffic? Or could it be something else.
I am new to implementing VPN service. What I would like to do is install a RV042 or RV082 (for added speed) and configure it to allow me to access the Internet (from home base) through the VPN from any location while on the road and using my laptop. My questions are: Can this be done? If so, what needs to be done in the configuration to allow gateway access to the Internet? I can't find any reference in the Cicso documents, but somewhere I saw that it can be done. I don't care about accessing anything on the local LAN. As I would be using the same Internet connection for the VPN and the access to get out----how would this affect speed? I plan to use Quick VPN as the client, and haven't even touched the client issue.