I spent three days trying to get the DMZ function in my newly purchased SRP 527w Small Business Router to work at no avail.All I want is for the router to place the 192.168.1.200 IP/Machine in the DMZ.I have configured the ports in the router as TRUSTED and there are no other conflicting rules but it doesn't work still.I tried upgrading to the latest firmware "SRP520W-1.1.24" and it didn't work either.
View 11 Replies
A SRP 527W is responsible for the data network in my office. But I am not able to access it. I use traceroute to confirm its IP address is “10.0.0.138”. I am not able to access / open 10.0.0.138 with my web browser. I even can not access the same address with telnet. So is there any solution to access the SRP 527W?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI recently ( three days ago ) purchased a SRP 527w and have been using it in a mixed Mac/Windows network. The setup is currently primarily using defaults apart from enabling logging. While I was still able to access the internet with some applications, accessing web content appears to have blocked after approximately 48 hours uptime.
No web pages using port 80 were available and that included the router web interface. The router would respond to ping only.
On a different note. I have to say that I find it very strange that the supplied documentation doesn't advise setting up the router using the admin login. It was only after reading one of the comments on this site that I was alerted to this security problem. I also find it rather annoying that I appear to have to purchase additional support merely to be able to download firmware updates which are designed to give the device improved functionality.
Just wanting to know if there is a way to disable unused LAN interfaces of these Cisco 527W routers. Looking through the configuration interface it doesnt seem to have an option for this. Also I am having trouble logging into the router via SSH or Telent . When I put the password in it says "access denied" . But password works for the web interface..
View 5 Replies View RelatedOur SRP527W is working - internet on and SIP phones on but I cannot access the Web interface anymore. When I try to login from any of the machines around I get a "not responding" message.
Before I get to the stage where I have to reset the whole thing and re-do the configuration completely ? I tried powering off and powering on as well as restarting all the switches etc... but I get the same result.
at our office we've recently upgrade from a old consumer-grade linksys wag200g modem/router/ap to the Cisco SRP527w. The Cisco is suffering from very frequent ADSL disconnections. These disconnections happens when there is some traffic to the internet and they seem to don't affect the LAN routing: on the weekends there are no disconnections at all while during the working hours there may be disconnections every FEW MINUTES making this router unusable. Often these disconnections force us to do a full reboot of the router.
Firmare version is SRP520W-1.1.19, the latest. ADSL line is a 6Mbps/640kbps. Noise margin is about 11dB for downstream and 20dB for upstream.
No voice line is used and therefore they are both disabled. 2 wireless network are active. The old linksys was (and is) working correctly, no adsl disconnections at all. Never.
I know how to disable the DHCP on the SRP527W but i was wondering how do i configure DHCP relay to point to a network DHCP server.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAs a raw test it is handy for us to ping externally the WAN port of the SRP 527W. How we configure the SRP 527W to allow this? FYI we have the inbulit SRP firewall enabled.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a pair of SRP-527W routers running latest firmware V 1.01.26. Everthing works fine. Except.... Have purchased a ZTE MF112 usb dongle as backup to the ADSL but router refuses to recognise it. In mobile network status shows as "Unable to Detect USB Mobile Modem".
Have tried a second dongle of the same type, cold reboot of router etc... but nothing. It is supposed to be supported in this release of firmware...?
we are trying to configure one to one NAT translations on a Cisco 527W-U, but are having some problems. We are running firmware version 1.2.4 (003) on the 527.
The DSL line is assigned with a /29 address range x.x.x.64 /29?
The DSL WAN interface picks up x.x.x.65 /32 from the Radius server. We are using the default private IP address range 192.168.15.0 /24 on the LAN (VLAN1), and can get to the internet ok with a PC connected to the LAN.
However when we try to set up a public IP address in the same range (eg x.x.x.66 /29) on VLAN1 (with x.x.x.67 on the PC) it will not connect. (won't allow us to configure an address from the same range as the WAN on a new VLAN interface).
we would want to be able to do one to one NAT translations eg x.x.x.66 on the outside to 192.168.15.2 inside, x.x.x.67 outside to 192.168.15.3 inside etc, but this will not either. We have tried this on a normal IOS router (887) and it worked ok. We have also tried the same on a small DSL router / modem product similar to the 527 from another manufacturer and it worked ok on that, but we wanted it to be able to work on the 527.
We have tried the NAT bypass feature without any success, reading several other discussion forums on this website leads me to believe that one to one NAT is not supported on this equipment at the moment, or at least not at the current firmware release.
One work around would be to just assign a /32 to the WAN interface on the DSL and route statically to a different routed subnet configured on the LAN, however we were wanting to avoid having to do that if possible.
We have a Cisco SRP 527W router that was not showing up on the LAN. so we tried a Factory Default reset but it seems to be dead.
The power light is flashing constantly,the 4 LAN light are constantly on,the DSL Data light comes on for 1 sec when device is powered up.
i have tried connecting directly to a PC, the NIC reports as network cable unplugged.i have tried the (power on device, hold down reset button, power of after 30 sec, power on after 5 sec, release reset button after 5 sec) but still "network cable unplugged".
the firmware flash utility will not find the NIC the device is connected to.the router is less than a year old, is there a fix or is it a warranty replacement ?
I have recently acquired one of these routers. I thought, being a Cisco product, it would be the bee's knees. It is not. After finally getting the network set up - no mean feat, although I do not claim any expertise, but had to resort to some other network management software to finally get it all running - the router drops either the WAN connection or the wireless connection many times a day. The laptops often show as being connected to the network/router, but are unable to access either the internet, or the router via the browser. Re-booting the router is the fix, but, hey, I can achieve that sort of performance with any old $20 router - none of my old Net gear routers was this troublesome.
The permanent fix would seem to be a firmware upgrade, but guess what? The only options available under the "Administration" tab are time setting and switch settings - no firmware upgrade. The supplied firmware is 1.01.09(001) Apr 7 2010. Why these products are supplied, as new, without the latest firmware installed beats me, but there you go.
The router recognizes the Sierra 312U modem but does not connect to Telstra. The modem is on a monthly plan (not pre-paid) and I have tried APN settings such as internet.telstra and internet.bigpond. The configuration is set to manual and the correct user id and password have been entered. explain the "daemon.err rc: start -1 port.... fail (-8)" in the log? 312U sierra model supposed to be compatible with SRP500s. Any other settings I should try?
Jul 13 17:59:09 SRP527W daemon.notice rc: 3G WAN is unplug
Jul 13 17:59:09 SRP527W daemon.notice rc: killall -TERM igmprt
Jul 13 17:59:10 SRP527W daemon.notice rc: igmprt -f -i br4080 -w 0 -c 5
Jul 13 17:59:12 SRP527W daemon.info 3G[354]: init 3G card phase get card info
Jul 13 17:59:13 SRP527W daemon.info 3G[354]: init 3G card phase verify pincode
[code]....
I have a Cisco 527w which we are wanting to deploy to our remote sites however i've found a bug. We use ADSL with an IPsec tunnel as primary and 3G APN for failover . When the ADSL goes down the route via the IPSec tunnel remains and i am unable to route the traffic via the APN backup without disabling the VPN tunnel .
View 0 Replies View RelatedWe have recently purchased a Cisco Small Business Pro SRP 527W router, all seems good and it is running smoothly, no disconnections or sync issues like our last router. However, after a certain amount of time the web management interface is unavailable through the browser (accessing it via 192.168.1.254 or the alternative we set-up 1.1.1.1) It is totally unavailable and timeouts in the browser yet there is still internet access and network is still alive. The web management interface was accessible before though and the only solution I have been able to do to access it again is to reboot this router.Could it be possible that because port 80 is forwarded to a different IP it interferes with the Web management interface? And how wcould the interface port access be changed?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have just installed an SRP 527w and it's basic operation is working fine. However, the ISP has allocated (and set up routing for) a range of 16 additional static addresses to the link that I now wish to configure and use, but I am having problems. Details are as follows (ip addresses are fictitious): [code]Extra ip range Netmask: 255.255.255.240From what I understand, these are added as subinterfaces which are bridged off the main WAN interface. However, when I try to add a subinterface by specifying (say) I get an error when saving : [code] The error states "IP Address and Gateway cannot be the same as the netmask".
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe're getting the following message in the logs when we ry to connect: encrypted Informational Exchange message is invalid because it is for incomplete ISAKMP SA
One of the router is a V2 and the other is a V4 if that makes any difference.
I've got a site that has a Cisco 887 with a static ip and a branch office with a SRP527W connect to a 3G Dongle (Dynamic IP Address). Is it at all possible to do some sort of IPSec Site to Site VPN so that both lans can communicate with eachother? I would assume that either DDNS would need to be configured or the SRP527W would need to be the initiator.
The other option would be to replace the SRP527W with a Cisco 881w/ 3G and do a DMVPN between the two but was hoping I could reuse the current hardware first.
I have a VPN tunnel from one RV082 to another, first router has IP range of 192.168.1.0 and the second one has range of 18.18.18.0, the connection works fine, here is where the issue starts, I am at a PC in the 18.18.18.0 network and I ping an IP in the other one e.g. 192.168.1.50 and it pings fine, but when I try to RDP into it or do anything to it I get no response, is it a firewall issue? Is it a NAT issue? I am at a loss, now that IP i mentioned does have RDP enabled and working because it is being port fowarded in the 192.168.1.0 router and I can access it through the public IP.
Also a workstation with a static IP 192.168.1.18 I can ping it if im in the local network but if I am in the remote one I cannot at all.
I've had 1 to 1 NAT setup for years now with no issues and the other day it simply stopped working. Rebooted everything, had ISP clear arp on their cable modem yet nothing going. As soon as I remove the 1 to 1 NAT on the router the PC has internet access. Add the 1 to 1 back and no out going internet. The configuration is pretty basic and has not changed.Thinking it could be a hardware issue I swapped it out with another RV042 I have with the exact config, same thing 1 to 1 NATs have no internet access. Upgraded one of the RV042 firmware to Firmware Version: 1.3.13.02-tm, had cable modem replaced, spent numerous calls with ISP. nada
I have found one interesting thing however, any internal machine which is set to dhp works fine, and static ip that does not have a 1 to 1 nat works fine and the last ip in the 1 to 1 nat range works fine. If I extend the range it is always only the last ip that works. Even if I add 1 to 1 nats one line at a time, it is always the last entry that works..
My WRVS4400N is not letting my VPN client through the router. I have checked the passthrough boxes for all 3 protocols. I have port range forwarding for my VPN connections to my SBS2008 box on port 1723.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI recently installed a new 220W with the sole intention of setting up the PPTP server. I got the router installed and working but cannot get the PPTP server working. Also when i configure a block of IP address from my lan for the server it tells me i cannot use that subnet? i have set it up this way with other routers ( RV042 ) with no issues.
firmware is 1.0.0.26
I tried to configure two RV042 working together. [code] WAN2 of both Router1 and Router2 are unused (unplugged). However, the Host2 can never ping to Host1. So as to Host1. Should I need to configure the protocol binding for all the traffic to the WAN1?
View 3 Replies View RelatedSo have a RV042 VPN router that is directly connected to the ethernet port of our comcast cable modem.
If I connect to it using QuickVPN (1.4.2.1) from a PC that is connected using AT&T 3G Network it works fine!
If I connect to it using QuickVPN (1.4.2.1) from a different PC that is connected using home WiFi (linksys wrtxxx) then it fails. In the VPN log all I see is failure messages for ping.
2011/10/22 15:47:28 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
If I open a regular command prompt and attempt to ping the VPN router it works so not understanding why the QuickVPN is unable to ping.
how I can troubleshoot this further. Makes me think the RV042 config is fine otherwise it would not work on a 3G connection. Something on the home PC or the home network. Not sure what to check.
I am trying to configure the DMZ on my SA520 router but without success.After a lot of tests I reduced everything to a very simple test case that is not working: I setted the "Optional Port Mode" to "DMZ" and enabled "DHCP Server" in the "DMZ Configuration", but DHCP on the DMZ does not assign any address.I am wondering if my optional port is broken or not.
View 4 Replies View RelatedUpdated to newest firmware 4.2.1.02 and wanted to perform a backup of the startup configuration. I get a "The webpage cannot be found" HTTP 400 error when trying to do this backup. I have changed some settings since my last backup, but that backup was done using the last firmware revision.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have two RVS4000 at both ends of a VPN tunnel. The tunnel is up and runs fine. I can ping the two servers at the main office end of the tunnel, and cconnect to the resources of both servers. However, one of the servers, the terminal server, is unreachable via RDP. The other server can be reached via RDP for administrative purposes just fine, but the terminal server cannot be reached. There is only one difference that I can think of. The terminal server is reachable from the outside world via a redirected forwarded port on the RVS4000 at the main office.
The current firmware version is V2.0.0.3 at both ends. Is this a known anomaly for this revision of firmware?
I got a RSV4000 router here with the latest firmware 1.3.3.5, trying to get the quick VPN client to connect.As far configurations go I have under WAN set the IP, subnetmask, DNS1, DNS2 and gateway. And under VPN I have created a client account with a password, created and then exported the Cert to my client PC.But when I attempt to connect, the QuickVPN software hangs for a few moments at "Connecting" and then fails; when the general error.I'm running this on Windows 7 x64.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy RV180 does not route properly between LAN and WAN through my PPPoE account. I am able to ping public IPs directly from the RV180 (through the diagnose section) but can not do it from any PC on LAN. The exact same configuration works perfectly well with a Linksys WTR610N. I upgraded formware from 1.0.0.30 to 1.0.1.9 but that did not make any difference.
The only time the RV180 will route is right after I reset to factory defaults and re-enter PPPoE account name and password. If I then reset my modem or the RV180, the RV180 does not route anymore between WAN and LAN even after several minutes and even though I can ping public IPs from the RV180.
I have the followint setup:
VLAN1 = 10.1.10.1
VLAN2 = 10.1.11.1
Inter WLAN routing is enabled on both VLANS
I have VPN PPTP set to 10.1.10.50-60
When I connect the VPN I get an IP address of 10.1.10.55 I can ping the 10.1.10.x network i cannot ping anything in the 10.1.11.x network.
I need to be able to see (ping/access by IP) both VLANs from a VPN PPTP connection.
I would like my SRP527 router to manage 2 VLAN. 1 for my whole LAN and employees WIFI connections, another one for external clients to access Internet by guest WIFI SSID.
- I have this Cisco SRP527W router acting as a gateway between my LAN and Internet.
- I have a second router used for VPN connections between my LAN and 2 external agencies.
- My LAN is using 192.168.0.0 / 255.255.255.0 network
- External Agence 1 is using 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0 network
- External Agence 2 is using 192.168.3.0 / 255.255.255.0 network
The Cisco Router is using 2 VLAN :
-VLAN 1 (LAN port 4 and SSID 1) -> 192.168.0.254 / 255.255.255.0
-VLAN 3 (SSID 2) -> 10.33.0.254 / 255.255.255.0
The Cisco router is using 2 static routes :
- Agence 1 : 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0 -> Gateway 192.168.0.249
- Agence 2 : 192.168.3.0 / 255.255.255.0 -> Gateway 192.168.0.249
The VPN router for external agencies is using 192.168.0.249 / 255.255.255.0.
When the SRP527W router has intervlan routing enabled, everything is working. I can ping my external agencies. However, external clients using guest WIFI can also ping my internal LAN. Disabling intervlan routing separate VLAN 1 and VLAN 3 properly, but i can't ping my external agencies anymore and i don't know why ?
Behind my Cisco router :
- 1 HP Gigabit switch (servers, VPN router are connected to it)
- 2 Switches (HP and Accton) both linked to the gigabit switch and where all my clients are connected.
No trunk link and vlan are defined on my switches.
The modem Time Warner gave me several years ago was dying, I took it in, they gave me a Cisco modem, I plugged it into the computer, works fine, so then I plugged it into my airlink 101 wireless router, the computer recognizes the router but says there is no internet access, i.e. the modem and router are not communicating. Why would change of modem cause lack of communication with the router, is there something different about modems now compared with roughly 5 years ago? And what can i do to fix it so i can have wireless access again? If it matters, I have no protection on my wireless (because I never figured out how).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a RV082 v2 with Firmware 2.0.2.01-tm with a Site-to-Site VPN to a Cisco ASA5510.
The PCs behind the RV082 can not see two webservers behind the ASA5510. Both servers have full DNS registration and are accessable from other sites with RV042 routers.
