I'm using a SRP521W-U. I've set up a SIP account on Line 1. I would like to be able to answer incoming calls on both FXS1 and FXS2. How do I achieve that both ports will ring?
View 2 RepliesMy Draytek 2710 just dies after 2 years so I was looking for something a little more reliable and noticed the spec of the SRP527W-U.I take it with only one antenna and reading a couple of past discussions, the wireless will only manage n-lite as some people call it i.e. 150Mbps, and not the full 300? Oh, and are the ports still only 100M and not Gig?I know the 547 would tick both these boxes but we are talking twice the price. How does the quality and logevity of the SRP500 series compare to the RV series (which would need an adsl modem) or the Linksys boxes?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco RV016 Small Business Router (firmware version 4.0.4.02-tm) . We have several old RV series Linksys, and the interface seem identical to this new Cisco version so it isnt difficult to have it configured. However, I am facing issues. I cannot ping from untrust to WAN IP of the router. However pinging from trust to any IP is just fine.
I tried disabling firewall, I also created a firewall rule that allows all ICMP from ANY to ANY. I also tried All traffic from Any to Any. But still the WAN1 and WAN2 IP addresses (Multiple ISP) still does not reply to ICMP.
Tomorrow 2012-06-06 is ipv6 launch day, what about ipv6 on srp500 series ? On product specification cisco wrote : IPv6 (RFC 6204) ready.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco wag120n adsl modem. I am setup with a SIP provider, so all my incoming and outgoing calls use SIP.So my question is, how does my ADSL modem handle incoming SIP calls,e.g the SIP call comes in and reaches my adsl modem. Then, how does the modem find the actual port that has my ATA adaptor (analog phone) or CME router attached ? I know port forwarding would handle this, but I am not actually using any configured port forwarding rules.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've buy a SRP500 Series Router (ADSL 2+).My ISP need RFC1483 Routed with LCC encapsulation type but this router dont have this type of encapsulation available in WAN settings. What can i do to use this device with my ISP adsl connection ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedRunning FWSM Firewall Version 3.1(4)
The problem is that calls originating from the outside of the firewall to the inside will ring but you cannot answer. The internal video conference server is a Polycom HDX 7000. There are ANY/ANY rules to/from this server and the default application inspection policy is set for h323/ras/h225 as follows:
[code]...
I have a standard ADSL modem which connects to the internet. On the inside I have a few computers within my LAN.when the modem receives an incoming request from the internet for a connection to one of my LAN computers e.g. a Skype incoming call, how does the modem know which port to forward that traffic to on my internal LAN? i.e. how does the modem know which of my computers is running the skype application that will answer the incoming call? I know port forwarding normally handles this sort of thing, but in my case, I am not using any configured port forwarding rules so how does the modem know where to forward skype traffic?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI start to use the CM. I received a request to block a number,I need to block the call only on the Call Manager or also on the Gateway that I have?
I have an SA520 that is being used as a front end firewall. Behind it I have an IP PBX. The VOIP provides are registered and I can make outgoing calls. However It appears that the SA520 is either blocking or not routing the calls. I have opened the ports recommended by both the IP PBX and the VOIP provider. What do I need to do to make incoming calls through the SA520?
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to: port forwarding to 2 different destinations based on incoming WAN port
The default HTTP service works fine: TCP80/80-> 192.168.0.55
I have a couple of IP security camera's I'd like to be able to access remotely that also listen on port 80. I tried TCP & UDP 8009/8009-> 192.168.0.9 without any luck. Not sure how to handle the port redirects on the RV042G? Seems simple and was on the Symantec, could be user training :-)
I was able to do port redirect with the Symantec Firewall I'm replacing.
Just purchased a Cisco RV110W for our small business. We were told this was easy for us to use and secure enough for our small office and for our travelling sales staff to access our website.
We purchased 2 dedicated IP-addresses, 216.82.5.230 for access to one server, and 216.82.5.231 for access to a second server (these IP-Addresses given are just an example; not real).
These come into the single RV110W WAN port. The two servers are plugged into 2 of the 4 LAN ports.
But the WAN setup page only accepts one WAN IP-Address. So when we put in 216.82.5.230, the outside world can HTTPS into one server, but we don't know how to get them to HTTPS to the second server when the other staff uses 216.82.5.231.
In summary, how to use the RV110W admin panel to forward the HTTPS/SSL traffic from 216.82.5.230 to one server (setup internally on 192.168.10.20), and the HTTPS/SSL traffic from 216.82.5.231 to the other server (setup internally on 192.168.20.20 using the VLAN setup on this router)?
I would like to use a SRP500 series router in a DM VPN solution. Or perhaps there is another scalable VPN solution I could use?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to filter ARP answer arriving on a C6500 trunk port, for a specific vlan.Filtering conditions are:
- packet arrive from vlan ID x on the trunk (on only for this vlan ID)
- source MAC address = xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
Thae aim is that the C6500 with never enter into its CAM table this MAC address.I looked at several methos like service policy or vlan filter, but no solution for the moment.
it would be possible to configure a White list on the SRP500 URL filter. In other words the customer wants to specify allowed URL's and all other URL's must be blocked.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI defined a static route: 192.168.0.0 / 255.255.255.0 / 192.168.1.201 (gateway), I can connect from 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.0.0 but we cannot ping in this local network. We have a CISCO 18000 as a VPN IP configured between this two local network.
View 1 Replies View Relatedis the SRP541W compatible with the Huawei E398 USB LTE Modem? If not, will it be compatible in the near future?
View 4 Replies View Relatedwhich 800 series routers allow 20 Mbps throughput across the WAN port? I have a cable modem that outputs this speed but am having difficulty finding a router that will accept this throughput across the WAN port.
View 21 Replies View Relatedhow many concurrent voice call can be conducted at once with the cisco sf 100d-08 8-port 10100 switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen i open Skype it try to allow incoming connection to port 57502.
Both times Little Snitch caught it. Attached are two images.
What would this connection be, I read this port is dynamic/private?
Im using a Linksys E4500 wireless router behind a Motorola SB6121 modem. My OS is Windows 7 and it is fully up to date. In general my entire network is working well. Now I have purchased a new IP surveillance camera and need to forward a port to be able to have remote viewing of the camera. Mi ISP blocks quite a few inbound ports including 80 so I have been trying a lot of ports all over the map to find something that will allow inbound access.
After several hours, nothing I have tried works, using a couple of different port probes including one called CanYouSeeMe I always get a "timed out" message. I have disabled the firewall in the router and on the local computer and still no luck. This says to me that either Cox is blocking nearly all ports (doubtful) or the modem is blocking access to the router somehow.
The Surfboard modem doesn't have a built in router. Unfortunately I don't have an old working modem to put in the circuit.
I don't guess it matters but the camera is accessible from all other local computers on the LAN using its IP address with a port number appended (right now it's using 8000).
I have a licensing server. Other computers need to turn on a program, they send a message to the licensing server, and it responds that they have permission to run.Until today the licensing server was plugged into its own ethernet wall socket and configured with a static IP address. Today I put a router into that wall socket and now the server's plugged into the router.The router (WRT-54G) was set to the static IP - and now the internet on its network works. I set all ports to be forwarded to the server's internal IP address - and now my programs can detect and ping it. But now the server won't send back permissions to use licensed software, or even reply with a list of the software which it can license.
View 1 Replies View Relatedmy WRT54G has been configured to block any and all incoming connections.continue to have disabled all port forwarding, port triggering, the DMZ, and QoS, via the applicable tabs under the [Applications & Gaming] Panel. The WRT54G continues to be configured to operate as a Gateway.No static routes are defined. The routing table show four entries, none of which are remarkable or match in anyway the partial address identified above.So I am under the impression that my WRT54G should be ignoring everything from the WAN-side.Even pinging the WAN-side of my router from the outside internet times out.My WRT54G ver 6 is at firmware level 1.02.8, which, as far as I can tell is the latest issued by Cisco.I am completely perplexed how such a connection is being established, and do not know if it is or has the potential of causing any harm. My own research indicates port 520 is typically used for RIP protocol, but I have almost zero knowledge of such.
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe have an RVS4000 router at two ends of a VPN tunnel. The VPN tunnel is working fine, however a phone at the remote site drops calls, even though they sound clear and unblemished. I have set highest priority on the port the phone is hooked up to at the remote site, and have set a priority for upload traffic on both routers, but the phone stills drops calls after 2 to 3 minutes.
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy firewall outpost detected incoming connections on port 80 and blocked them.I think that the router must block incoming connections on port 80, right? But it does not.
[URL]
having trouble to configure the Cisco SRP527w where we have two incoming VLAN's.
1. vlan1 is for internet (20mbps)
2. vlan2 is for a specific application (Specific IP Address - 10mbps)
Somehow we are unable to configure the router to enable PC's connected to the router to access both vlan based to the application specific vlan. Its always routing it through the internet.
I'm having an issue where our RV042 router is blocking some of our customers from sending us e-mails.I noticed thatCISCO has produced a newer version of the RVO42 V3.0 and has firmware version 4.x. can you upgrade the Linksys RV042 Hardware V 1.2 to the 4.x firmware? I have found a few articles and forums online about otherpeople having the same issue with the RV042 v1 randomly blocking, e-mail but no one ever has a solution to correct the issue.Some people have recommend to roll back to factory default and reconfigure the router as the config may by corrupt.
View 4 Replies View RelatedIf I have the IP ACL firewall enabled in my RVS4000 I have trouble connecting to specific websites and also connecting to Apple's update servers. The problem appears to be that the firewall is blocking incoming data to the ephemeral ports even when they are allowed in the firewall rules. I've also tried port forwarding rules but the only thing that resolves the problem is to disable the firewall entirely, which is not the desired resolution. The firmware version is 2.0.27.
View 11 Replies View RelatedWe try to establish a Site-To-Site- IP Sec- connection between a Cisco 876 (local site) and a Check Point-firewall (remote site). The Cisco 876 is not directly connected to the internet, but is behind a DSL- Router with port-forwarding, forwarding ports 500 and 4500. The running config of the Cisco 876 is appended to this discussion thread. Unfortunately I get no output when debugging the connection with commands "debug crypto isakmp" and "debug crypto ipsec".
From the Checkpoint-firewall point of view the connection seems to establish, but there is no ping answer.
The server on the local site that should be reached from the network behind the Checkpoint-firewall has a routing entry "route -P add [inside ip-net remote] 255.255.255.0 [inside ip local]" (see also appended running config for naming of ip- addresses). Establishing a Cisco VPN- Client connection to the same Cisco 876 router works fine.
The first router is wired to the DSL modem and works just fine as an access point with Internet access. The second router is wired from the first router using one of the 4 ports on both router hubs. The second router is visible but has no Internet. How to configure the second router regarding DHCP, LAN, WAN, DNS etc.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two matching N300 Belkin routers. The cable modem feeds into modem1 and modem1 feeds into modem2. I get a good wireless connection on modem1. Modem2 shows up on a wireless scan and it accepts the password. It however will not connect.
View 1 Replies View RelatedFor some time now I've used the USB port on RSP440's fitted into ASR9006's to load IOS with no problems.Recently I noticed that the ASR9001 USB port doesn't seem to work at all, which seems odd to me as I believe the 9001 uses the same card built into the chassis.All routers were running the same code version 4.3.0, and I was using the same memory stick?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to open ports 9080 and 5280 on my Cisco ASA 5505 firewall and despite doing everything I THINK I needed to do...when I run the utility to check from outside; it is NOT open....I utilize a website called [URL] (very good for these kinds of things) I have added the specific port(s) to my services so that I can CHOOSE them; added an ACE/ACL to; added incoming/outgoing rules to accomodate traffic to those ports....NOTHING.
View 7 Replies View Related