trying to join an 1142 on a WLC_SRE version 7.4.
the AP can ping the controller and vice versa. In the controllers GUI: Monitor>Statisticc>AP join, I can find the mac of the AP that I am trying to get joined.
the details of this mac show:
Last error occurred: Lwapp discovery request rejected
last occurred error reason: Too many concurrent AP image downloads
Last Join Timestamp:
We are having random issues of users not being able to connect to our wireless network consistently. The users will have successfully accessed the network previously but then will have difficulty associating to the network. After a period of time, the association appears successful again. My first thoughts were that there was a restriction on the number of clients that could associate to a given AP at any one time.This is the equipment we have:1x Cisco Wireless Control Server (WCS) 6.0.181.04x Cisco 5508 Wireless LAN Controllers 6.0.196.060x Aironet 1142N Lightweight Access Points (LAP) Is there a hard or recommended maximum number of clients per LAP? If so, where is this defined? From what I have read on these forums, Cisco apparently recommends about 25 clients per AP but I can not find any official documentation to support this.When I go to WCS Home > General > Top APs by Client Count, the top AP reports 20 clients. However, if I click on the AP Name and go to the Current Associated Clients tab, it is only listing 8 clients - why is this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhen I check the AP join statistics I see the following: Reason For Last Unsuccessful Attempt RADIUS authorization is pending for the AP, I don't run a radius server and don't know how to get around this so that the device can join.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to use 1142 APs with a 2504 Wireless Controller through a D-Link 48PT GBIT XSTACK SWITCH (DLI-DGS-3120-48PC/SI).At any rate, the 1142 AP joins with the wireless controller ONLY when I attach it directly to the controller. When connected directly to the controller the AP functions normally and all is well. When I attach it through the D-Link switch, the AP flashs green several times, indicating that it can't find the controller. I suspect that there's some setting on the D-Link switch that's preventing the AP from seeing the controller.
View 6 Replies View RelatedOn the WLC I've set DHCP address pool, everything seems fine after ap download image -> reboot -> hit "Enter" to start blar blar blar... however, after a few second the WLC will initial upgrade image again and again. it's like a non-stop process.
Attached is the start up message, as you can see, i captured it after the ap successfully boot up, and WLC initial another cycle of image upgrade.
btw, my network is flat, WLC & AP all in the same network.
*Nov 3 06:28:30.788: %CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state to JOIN
examining image...!
extracting info (292 bytes)
[Code].....
This is one I am having a hard time finding an answer for. How many clients can a 3600 AP support? For 150 clients on one of these, what would the throughput be for each client?
If my calculations are correct, the device can deliver 420 Mbps, which gives each client roughly 2.8Mbps. Is this correct?
I'm have upgraded our ASA5510's from 7.0.8 to 8.4.3 and now I just need to do the ASDM, but get this error? The bin file has been uploaded: [code] Device Manager image set, but not a valid image file disk0:/asdm-647.bin.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWas looking at purchasing WAP321 however after looking at the spec's I see it has not got concurrent dual band (2.45Ghz/5Ghz) is there any simular access points with dual band and captive portal?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat is the maximum number concurrent wireless connections that a WAP54g v3 can have?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI'm looking at adding a Cisco 3750-X switch running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE1 (IP base license) into a stack of 3750-G switches running c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin Given that the version and feature sets are the same I don't forsee any compatibility issues. Would there be any reason why a universal image wouldn't stack correctly with other switches running the single .bin file?
View 9 Replies View RelatedIt is on my home network. My administrator says I hog the internet. I cannot even update programs
View 6 Replies View RelatedI've just bought a Cisco RV180W and I am trying to find its newest firmware but I am getting 404 everytime I access or search for this updates.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two ASA5510 each with a security plus license and 10 SSL VPN licenses, in active/standby mode at version 8.4(4)1. It only allows up to two vpn clients (AnyConnect & SSL VPN) at a time, any extra vpn client would receieve "Login Failed" message.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat the maximum concurrent users you can have on a Cisco 3925 for :-
1) Site to Site VPN using IPSEC tunnels
2) GRE tunnel sIf I have 90 users on a single GRE tunnel with 50mb Internet pipe using fat clients will this work ?
I am on a 4Mbps internet line.i have 3 PCs connected to the internet through a router. i noticed that direct downloads on the 2 PCs that are connected to the router wirelessly are capped at about 50-60kbps/sec per download. just to clarify, i can still achieve a full speed of 400kbps in total, but just that each download is capped at 50-60kbps.however, on the PC that is connected directly to the router via ethernet cable i am able to download well over 150kbps per download.so i don't think it's my ISP that is capping my downloads here, but i can't figure out why downloads would be capped on the wireless PCs. is it some settings on my router? i have everything pretty much set on default. the modem is a D-Link 2640B.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI am currently planning a Active directory deployment. It will most likely be a new forest, but the domain could become part of a existing forest. I have about 45 Computers with about 85 users. At one time there is about 42 users logging in as there is two shifts. The logons will be done all at once. Do you think two domain controllers will be able to handle the load?
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe have a PIX 501 and I'm in the process of replacing it with a ASA5505. We're currently using the 501 for a site-to-site vpn for disaster recovery purposes and I'm trying to verify the number of concurrent connections we can have.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been looking for the command to view all concurrent active connections or sessions on our Cisco 2911. I want to see what the total connections or sessions are at peak times throughout the day.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have a client that is looking to provide connectivity for up to 800 users at a conference. They have a SRP527W available to them. Looking at the configuration we have been able to provide the needed number of IP addresses through VLANs each with their own DHCP scope.
However we are doubtful that the router will be able to process such a high number of connections (NAT, Firewall etc.) even though they will be using a specialised application that pulls static content via WAN.
Thus far we have been told that the unit has supported 150 user no issue, my I am guessing anything over 200 and you would start to see stability issues?
What are the limitations on the max number of concurrent HTTPS connections when using Auth Proxy for HTTPS traffic on a Cisco ASA 5520.
1) What is the max number of concurrent Authentications that the ASA can perform (HTTPS)?
2) Once Authenticated. What is the max number of concurrent HTTPS Authenticated connections to the back end HTTPS server.
Our current cable ISP is having issues providing us with consistant connectivity. I would like to bring in a second ISP to allow my users to choose where they will connect to. There will be two dns names and i just want to to be able to choose between them.
Is this possible on the ASA5505? supporting two ISPs at one time for VPN on both?
in Cisco ASA 5540 Adaptive Security Appliance Platform Capabilities and Capacities, I see Concurrent Sessions: 400,000. Which mean what device can handle 400,000 session and no more. But if I'm using TCP State Bypass Feature (Inbound traffic pass via ASA but Outbound goes via different device). I can see such connections via show conn command with b flag.
My questions: 1. Will this limit (Concurrent Session) affect in this case? Or ASA can handle more such connections (for example 800,000 ...) in bypass state? 2. It's possible to tune timeout for such connection without using global timeout conn? My problem what I want to do by pass tcp connection for one IP with has very high connection/sec rate.
I would like to setup a a wireless antenna so one of my relatives can get online. I live in the city with a dsl connection and they live two houses down and out of the city limits. Can I configure the wireless connection so they can not use it to download music and movies ? Just to use it to browse the internet and check mail. Is it possible to throttle the band width they could use?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently switched to cable with Comcast. I am getting 20+Mbps wired, but I only get 1 Mbps w/wireless download. I am getting 4+ upload via wireless. Is my set up wrong? I reset my modem and Internet worked fine without any other changes. I am planning on buying a modem (instead of leasing) should I buy a gateway? I didn't think this router was out dated yet.
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow many concurrent voice call can be conducted at once with the cisco sf 100d-08 8-port 10100 switch?
View 1 Replies View Relatedtell me if cisco 1921 onboard GigabitEthernets can reach 10Mbps with concurrent services, one GigabitEthernet interface as WAN interface, the other one as LAN interface.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI´m detecting on my ACE 20.
I´m monitoring the total number of concurrent sessions of my ACE 20 (using Cacti), and from time to time, with no discernable pattern, I see an instant drop of sessions to half...I don´t detect any disturbance with our traffic and service, I have no complaints, but it's a very accentuated drop.
I´m able to get 1 or 2 days withouth any suddent drop of connections, and then for no reason I pass from 500.000 to 200.000 sessions in a minute. Then they gradually go up again.
I´ve seen in ACE´s session table that she keeps a great number of half-open, or closed sessions, and those are counted as part of concurrent sessions. Is there any flush on ACE´s table when she reaches a certain number of closed TCP sessions or something like that?
I have Cisco AP 1142 standalone and I want this one to operate with WLC.
I have searched in Google, they said I need to upgrade AP1142.
I don't know how to upgrade it.
i have a problem using my usb to serial cable connection, i can connect to one router on my work, but i can't connect to AP 1142, (i have tested also con AP 1231).i have a laptop running windows 7 64 bits, before i use a win xp 32 bits, and i didn't have problems.i am using putty, and have installed tera term 4.74 but the same.connection details, 9600, 8, 1, N, N.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI can't get connectivity from laptop to AP using cross over or straight through cable to do a tftp transfer from tftp server on laptop to ap.
I held the mode button on ap and powered on to get to rommon. The ap has no ios so it goes to rommon anyway. ap light is blinking red.
ap: set
DEFAULT_ROUTER=10.0.0.1
IP_ADDR=10.0.0.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.224
[Code].....
After AP is booted it shows the following message and cannot able to join in WLC:
*Mar 1 07:13:37.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 192.168.71.16 peer_port: 5246
*Mar 1 07:13:37.000: %CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state to
[Code].....
i am going to purchase a Simultaneous Dual Band Router with Gigabit Lan. Can anybody tell me whats the transfer speed it got on Concurrent Dual Band 900(450+450) , 750(300+450) and 600(300+300). I am going to use it for hard drive that can network attached or may be just external hard drive via USB interface.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm using a Huawei B660 3G router at my house, with with a service provider called 8ta (in South Africa). I've been struggling for months to try and get them to troubleshoot and fix my connection, which was working fine for about a year.
I'm now daily struggling with download speeds of as little as 0.1Mbps to 0.5Mbps, especially after 5pm until about midnight. Upload speed off course is even worse.
8ta, has after months of me complaining agreed to install an antenna at my house, which will probably take another few more weeks for them to accomplish.
I often have 5/5 bars of signal on the router, so my argument is that signal strength might not be the problem. Since the connection is in a residential area, I would assume that their network is more likely to be a bit more congested after hours, but a technician explained to me that their network is never more than 30% "occupied".
Can the number of users connected on the 3G network/tower cause signal strength to attenuate for surrounding users?
Would it replace the B660 (7Mbps) router with a 21Mbps counterpart?