D-Link DIR-615 :: How To Route All Incoming Connections To Default To Web Server
Jan 3, 2013
How to configure my DIR-615 (Hardware Version E1 - Firmware Version 5.00NA) to:
1. Assign/Reserve IP address for 2 machines.
2. Route a web browser to a server on the first machine (port 80) as a default when another computer or smart-phone or device joins my open wireless network.
I am hoping to eliminate any changes to the IP address of the first two computers so that the server's IP address and port are static. I would also like anyone who joins the network to merely open their browser and be presented with the http interface from my server.
I have a Cisco 3745 that is my internet router, I have a domain that directs the web address to the WAN IP address...Can I set up my 3745 to forward incoming connections to my server?
I've been fighting with getting VPN connections working properly with my Dlink router. I set up virtual servers for PPTP and L2TP and could usually get the first attempt to work. Subsequent client connections would always fail.The logs display the following-Dropped GRE packet from 192.168.0.10 to 64.232.xxx.xxx as unable handle packet header. Blocked incoming GRE packet from 64.232.xxx.xxx to 76.105.xxx.xxx.What seemed to fix it was going to Firewall Settings and setting UDP Endpoint Filtering to Endpoint Independent and TCP Endpoint Filtering to Address Restricted.
I am trying to make my computer support incoming VPN connections. I am using Windows 7 Home Premium on the computer I want to make the connection on.I am also using Verizon FioS internet (comes with default router/modem combo) to which I have the DIR-655 router connected. I am able to connect to both WiFi's fine and they work correctly.I think the Verizon router is set to block incoming VPN connections and I think this is why I cannot get anyone to be able to access my computer / internet via VPN. How I can perhaps forward ports and which settings I would need to specifically change in both routers admin settings so that I can get VPN connections to forward to my computer and be accepted.
I've enabled antispoof on all interfaces on asa 5510.If you start a traceroute to a network on the default route, everything works, since replies comes to an interface with route 0.0.0.0/0 defined.If you start a tracer route to a network that is NOT on the default route (let's assume coporate MPLS), you only get response from first carrier router, the other are discarded because of anti spoof violation.
I have ICMP inspection and icmp-error inspection enabled.
i have with my Edimax router. I could not make any progress with Edimax personnel in Taipei.
If i connect my vista box directly w/o the router, i can see that port 21 (Filezilla) is open, using WhatsMyIP.org | Port Scanners/Sniffers
When I insert the Edimax br6215srg router, the port is in timeout as reported by aforementioned site (guess the port scanner gets no synack nor reset back to the syn it sends)
The router is set to "disable firewall" or to "enable firewall and DMZ enabled" with as client's ip the one that is configured in the router's dhcp table for the vista box. The NAT module is set to forward port 21 to the same ip. ipconfig confirms that i do get the ip programmed in the router's dhcp table.
I do not want to believe that this edimax box is unable to forward connections!
I recently moved house to a flat where I now have an adsl wireless router. Ever since I installed it its been major problems for me, my speeds are terrible takes ages to load a webpage and days to download anything. Also I have tried to stream to my apple tv through the use of airplay mirroring but this again doesn't work and an error code appears every time which I then looked up and it says its to do with my firewall blocking incoming connections. I have gone to my routers settings to try change this and it says to select the options by clicking the radio buttons however they do not exist on the page as you can see on the screenshot below.
Just purchased a Cisco RV110W for our small business. We were told this was easy for us to use and secure enough for our small office and for our travelling sales staff to access our website.
We purchased 2 dedicated IP-addresses, 216.82.5.230 for access to one server, and 216.82.5.231 for access to a second server (these IP-Addresses given are just an example; not real).
These come into the single RV110W WAN port. The two servers are plugged into 2 of the 4 LAN ports.
But the WAN setup page only accepts one WAN IP-Address. So when we put in 216.82.5.230, the outside world can HTTPS into one server, but we don't know how to get them to HTTPS to the second server when the other staff uses 216.82.5.231.
In summary, how to use the RV110W admin panel to forward the HTTPS/SSL traffic from 216.82.5.230 to one server (setup internally on 192.168.10.20), and the HTTPS/SSL traffic from 216.82.5.231 to the other server (setup internally on 192.168.20.20 using the VLAN setup on this router)?
I'm trying to create a route from a VPN ip to the VPN server in my LAN. Anyhow, the DIR-655 does not let me create routing within the LAN (since only the WAN interface option is available).I have tried with the following firmwares: 1.11, 1.21, 1.30.
Is it possible with the DIR-601 to have one of the IP's on the LAN route all traffic through a proxy server? I would like to have my Roku device (which I've setup as a static on the LAN side) to always connect though a proxy, while all my other devices connect to the internet normally.
I need to block 4000 nodes (Ultrasurf, TOR exit nodes) and I've written a script that will ssh and copy in these objects (prob 100 at a time) into an object group and then put a blanket deny. I don't see a flood of traffic (occassional hits every other day, etc) but I was wondering what the impact would be? Can the ASA handle an object group of that size plus an ACL with it? Any way to block incoming connections from TOR/Ultrasurf?
We have a Cisco 2911 Router and have configured via BT Infinity Broadband for out going internet access etc. Are there any incoming restrictions ACL settings etc. that will stop us using for ISA VPN, Exchange connections, Intranet, Sharepoint etc. We have reserved 13 Static IP Addresses from the ISP.
I was at my computer when the desktop appearance and taskbar changed. I immediately opened task manager to see what program might have caused this and didn't see anything out of the ordinary. Then about 2 minutes later my desktop changed back to what it normally is. I then went and disabled remote desktop connections... I think that someone may have accessed my pc remotely, buy I wasn't able to catch them at it. Is there any way to review incoming remote desktop connections historically?
I've been fighting with my E2500 since I got it back in June with lag, dropped connections, etc. It's a bit intermittent but can hang around for hours at a time when it kicks in. Restarts but the issue always comes back. Most noticeable while gaming online or on a VOIP program such as Team Speak. Generally when it happens If I'm monitoring my Team Speak connection the incoming packet loss shoots up between 20-30%, starting to drop out every other word or so. No out going packet loss. The connection drops are random between computers (I have one mac and one pc in the house) where one will be fine and the other wont, or when the whole system will stay connected and drop all transfer. In the case of this last one it's not my ISP's connection as any streaming happening between one computer and an Apple TV device will also cease. I've also swapped back to my old router (an older model linksys) and all problems have stopped. Fully rebooted and reconfigured the router about 3 or 4 times and am on the latest version of firmware (1.0.003). It was much worse on 1.0.002 but still very noticeable on 003. Also no difference with a different wireless adapter. I've tried the chat technical support but all they did was take 45 minutes to tell me how to reboot my router after telling them I already had.
I want to leak default internet route to CE VRF as common service.Since we having two ASBR, can I point next hop to PE itself instead of either of the ASBR?I tried to point NH to loopback of the PE itself but it failed.
I'm working on a practice lab and am having the following issue. I have a customer router connected to two different ISP routers. Each ISP router must advertise a default through BGP to the customer and one of the default routes must be preferred over the other. Given if the preferred route interface is shut down the other default route is inserted into the routing table and when the preferred default route interface it turned back on that path is used again. The catch is I cant alter the customer router only the the two ISP devices. I tried doing some route maps but I'm lost. I have deleted all my route maps and have posted the BGP portion of the ISP routers.
router bgp 300 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes [Code]....
Looking through the SPROUTE course material they state on several occasions that an ABR will announce a default route in to a standard NSSA area, same as a stub area, because LSA5 external routes are not allowed.
I bought a WRVS400N v2 to be used as an access point. Currently it is hooked up on my switch via a trunk port and is able to communicate with my gateway. Whenever I try to access an IP subnet other then the local IP address of the WRVS, I get a network unreachable error. To fix this for my local networks, I added the appropriate static route to cover my local LANs and that seems to work now. I tried to add route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 using the web interface for internet access, but somehow it does not recognize this as a default route (quad zero!?). Does any know how I can set the default gateway in this router? Maybe, but hopefully not, I have to use the WAN port to create some kind of uplink and use one of the LAN ports to connect using the trunk port and route traffic for the clients over the WAN port .
I have an 877 router which has a DSL WAN interface. The DSL service at this site is unreliable, so the company have purchased a separate 3G router to be used as a backup. This device maintains 3G connectivity at all times and has a static IP on the internal subnet (for arguments sake let's say 10.0.0.253).
What I want to do with the Cisco router is to track the DSL interface and if it is up, install a default route pointing to it. If it is down, I want the default route to be the 3G router.
I am thinking the best way to do this is to set up a track and then set 2 default routes; one which is installed if the tracking is up, the other has a higher admin distance and points to the 3G router and thus should only be used if the track is down. For example:
track 10 interface Dialer0 ip routing delay down 30 up 30 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 track 10 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.253 100
Is this likely to work or is there a better way to do it?
Is it possible to send all traffic through site to site VPN using SRP521W (on the other site ASA) ? Lets say, traffic to Internet from branch through HQ - site to site VPN between branch and HQ. I've tried to set up destination crypto policy entry to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 but it's not accepted. Firmware version is 1.01.26 (003)
I am having a strange requirement. actually I am not sure it is strange or not. I am having ASA5510 with 8.4 sw version. Currently one ISP is connected to it. It is working fine. We have some servers that are directly connected to internet using another ISP connection. These servers having public IP addresses configured on their LAN settings. I need to move these servers in to the DMZ zone.
When i connect it to the ASA's DMZ zone,servers will get internet through the first ISP that is already configured on ASA. But i need to NAT the DMZ servers with the IP address provided by the other ISP, which even not configured on ASA.
So what should i do? In short my requirement is
1) need to NAT the server with the IP address provided by another ISP
2) Also note that the default route is configured for the first ISP only in ASA
so Do i need to configure another default route? Do i need to make it with larger AD? So i do it will act as the secondary route only.
I need to make the ASA up and running for two ISP, and servers in the LAN should be able to NAT with the IPs of first ISP and ,the servers in the DMZ zone should be able to NAT with the public IP of the new ISP.
In case customers buy IP transit(there is a BGP session between ISP and customer), they often ask for default route and for example prefixes from local internet-exchanges. What is the advantage to have default route + certain smaller(for example /17, /18 and /24) prefixes?
I have this topology: ( I use OSPF instead of EIGRP for routing between PE CE. The customer vrf name is cusA, they have 4 sites: CE from site 3 have 2 links to 2 PE ( one for backup). CE from site 3 has exist point to internet and how can i choice 1.1.1.2 is next-hop for default-route
My 2811 is connected with two ISP,s as below and have VPN with Central branch.I want to set DSL as primary and WiMax as secondary but problem is that routes learned via BGP get precedence over default route as they are specific one.I think i may need to put all static specific routes of central branch over DSL along defautl but I want any idea if my default route stay active and when it down then BGP neighborship can be establish (like ip sla tracking.)
We have Cisco ASA 5505, 90.x.y.2/29 IP is assigned to outside interface. We have one internal HTTP server so that I use static (inside,outside) tcp interface [URL] to forward all incoming HTTP traffic to internal HTTP server 1. Now we need to add new physical HTTP server 2 so that I would like to forward
HTTP traffic to e.g. 90.x.y.3/29 to 172.16.0.11.
How can I do that? See scenario image (scenario.png) if needed.
I use the fibre internet for almost all internet activities since the speed is fast.However, when I do school's stuff, I need to VNC to my lab's server. Hence I need to connect to school internet point. External IP cannot directly connects to my school's server.Therefore, I would need to force Windows (or VNC) to use the connection of the Wireless Ethernet card when I VNC to my lab's server. But I want to use my fibre for all other internet activities.
I have a Cisco 2851 (with a 4 port switch module) that I am trying to set up with two different internet connections, and have it route traffic out to them based on the source IP. One connection is a 50mb Comcast connection, another is our T1 that our servers are hosted on. The goal is to guide server/phone system traffic to the T1 and have the rest default to the Comcast. I currently have the 2851 connected to our Layer 3 switch (Dell Powerconnect 6224) with a subnet created between them. Static routes have been created on the 2851 back to all of our existing subnets. Traffic flows internally without a problem between the subnets and 2851 (and vice versa). I set up the 2851 with route-map's in the NAT to control the flow of traffic, with the default route set to the Comcast connection. Default route works great, speedtest shows full speeds and everything looks great. The problem happens when I apply my route-map policy to the internal LAN interface with the ACL list of IP's that I want to guide to the T1 (with a next-hop of the T1's IP address). I tested some tracert's and pings from one of the IP's in this list and they would stop at the T1 modem and not go any further. I did a "show ip nat translations" and noticed that the "outside" portion (right half) was blank for every IP that was in the ACL or related to the T1. So my guess is it looks like this is not doing NAT for the T1? I double-checked that I had my "ip nat inside" on the LAN interface and "ip nat ouside" on the T1 VLAN interface and Comcast interface and they were there.
I have a MPLS cloud in our data center. I want one network coming into our core router to have a different default route than the other networks coming in. I'm getting hits on the acl but the route isn't applied and goes to the default route that is configured in the router. I have other PBR for setting local-preferences and as-paths and they are working fine.
The router is a 7206 Version 12.4(11)T3
! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.3.4 ! ip access-list extended 2nd_Default_Route
