I configured dmvpn at cisco router 2900. one hub router and 3 spokes. all of them are working normally but tomorrow i see one error at at one spoke router.
error:
Maximum Tx Bandwidth limit of 85000 Kbps reached for Crypto functionality with securityk9 technology package license
I have setup a hub and spoke VPN with communication between the spokes, the hub is also capable of receiving VPN clients connections using Cisco VPN client.
Is there a way to enable communication to the spokes using just the VPN Client connection to the hub?
Hub Static Ip / 10.0.0.1 DMVPN IP / 192.168.1.0 LAN
Spoke 1 Dynamic Ip / 10.0.0.2 DMVPN IP / 192.168.5.0 LAN
Spoke 2 Dynamic Ip / 10.0.0.3 DMVPN IP / 192.168.4.0 LAN
Spoke 3 Dynamic Ip / 10.0.0.4 DMVPN IP/ 192.168.2.0 LAN
Tunnels are up and running with communication between the spokes.
I am having a hard time trying to configure DMVPN with the tunnel being sourced via a loopback interface. All routers are Cisco 886 routers which don't have L3 ports.That is why I used SVI interfaces, and have configured the L2 ports (Fa0, Fa1, etc.) with the command switchport access vlan.The problem is that I am receiving Invalid SPI error's only on the Hub router and I have no clue what could be the problem, because they use exactly the same parameters for IPsec. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedThere use to be Cisco 851 routers, but lately these routers are replaced with Cisco 861-K9 routers, and these 861 routers doesn't support DMVPN, instead 851 use to be.
Is there any license file we can upload in 861 router for DMVPN capability, if yes may i know the SKU # for that. We have some customers having 6-7 locations and they are planning to have 2 more locations, we implement already DMVPN in there network, if we go with the 87X or 88X router there price is almost double the price of 861.
I am trying to spec out some routers for a small DMVPN network.I was thinking 2801's for my hub routers.will these run DMVPN out of the box or do they need additional hardware modules?according to the below linkyou need a "AIM-VPN/SSL-2" module in order for it to work, but then according to"The Cisco 2800 Series supports IPSec Digital Encryption Standard (DES), Triple DES (3DES), Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) 128, AES 192, and AES 256 cryptology without consuming an AIM slot."
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat router would you choose to setup 1500 dmvpn tunnels (mGRE/ipsec)? so this router will be my hub and the hub will have 1500 tunnels.this router with this many tunnels will have to be able to provide excellent service to all spokes/tunnels.the spokes will mainly use the tunnels for business, transfering small files and some email I would say they may transfer 500megabyte of data per day but that's the absolute maximum.
View 4 Replies View RelatedTrying to setup a DMVPN on out existing equipment that is currently running all point to point vpn connections. basicly its not working. my best guess is something with the config is interfering but i'm not sure the remote router (881) is always comming back with MM_NO_STATE and the main router(2901) is either MM_NO_STATE or MM_SETUP.
I added the config for the 881, 2901 and a debug crypto isakmp and debug crypto ipsec from both routers. I have verified the Keys are correct and it is not blocking port 500. if i issue a sh crypto isakmp policy they are the same on both routers. if you need me to post anything else i will, one note i removed the configs that were part of the point to point tunnls on the 2901 router.
I configured a 2811 series router for dmvpn. My two tunnels are up but one of the tunnel is flapping with this message.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have setup DMVPN and EAZYVPN on one router. Tunnel interface on Spoke one and Spoke two are up/up and show crypto ISakmp sa shows both tunnels are in idle. However, tunnel to Spoke one(10.10.1.1) keep bouncing on and off(see below). Every 30 sec or so, the tunnel gone back to IKE phase while tunnel for spoke two(5.5.5.1) still leave active. THe configuration on the HUB side is the same for both spoke!! show crypto ipsec sec shows both side has the same life time(IOS default). Could that be an IOS debug on the spoke one?
Hub :
Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.1(3)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
HUB#sh crypto ipsec security-association
Security association lifetime: 4608000 kilobytes/3600 seconds
Spoke one:
Cisco IOS Software, C2600 Software (C2600-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.4(8), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
[code]....
I have few router Cisco RV042, and VPN links between them with a hub and spokes topology. Every spoke VPN works, they succeed to connect to the hub. The hub can see every spokes VPN active. A computer under the hub can connect to a computer under any spoke. A computer under any spoke can connect to a computer under the hub. That works great. Now, what I really need is to connect computers under a spoke to connect to computers under an other spoke. I was wondering if the Cisco RV042 can be configure to allow that and HOW? If it can't be done, what other router should I use as the HUB? Does I need to change the spokes as well?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIf there is a router ISRG2 2900 with SEC license and without HSEC license, there is a limit in count of cumulative encrypted VPN tunnels of 225. Which commands can show us a number of current tunnels on the router, so we can see if we are near this limit of 225?
View 4 Replies View RelatedMy customer is looking at using routers in DMVPN remote locations as DNS servers. He would like to be able to estimate how much memory the DNS cache will consume before going into production. I know you can get cache information when it's running, but he wants to plan ahead.I couldn't find any reports in Cisco or on the web of DNS caching causing memory issues, so I don't think he has much to worry about, but any rule of thumb as to how much memory each cache entry consumes would be useful. Or is there a protection mechanism to limit cache memory size in IOS ? The routers will be 877s and/or 1900-series.
View 0 Replies View RelatedWe are facing network heavy and slow performance at one of our remote site, we are using Cisco2800 series router with same IOS on either of the sites.Our WAN network is running on BGP with EIGRP configured and tunnels were configured on either of the sites. As part of the testing I have removed the tunnel to see the performance was ok from Head office to remote branch and the WAN network is getting heavy and slow down when we put the tunnel back in hub and spoke.
quick info
Cisco 2800 Series router
IOS: (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE
I have DSL 8Mbps DL and 768kbps UL The setup look like this:Internet -> Modem -> Cisco Router -> Firewall -> Switch Core - > Multiple switches like sfe2000p? CiscoRouter: i use port gig0/1 for PPPoE and i use port gig0/2 for LAN static Router port gig0/2 with 122.54.144.153/29 connected directly to Firewall port13 with 122.54.144.154/29 ?i want 122.54.144.153/29 will my default gateway ? include no limit bandwidth,filter etc at router, Firewall will be DHCP Server and control the bandwidth, filtering etc and the client computer should get 8Mbps
Mode: Routing
Encapsulation: PPPoE
Username: xx
Password: xx
Service Name: ISP name
[code]....
Any way to disable the usb console port on a 2900 series router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to set up snmp v3 monitoring of my 2900 series routers from the third party Spiceworks utility. My snmp config on the router looks like this:
SNMP-Server view Westv3View internet included
SNMP-Server group Westv3Group v3 priv Read Westv3View
SNMP-Server user Westv3User Westv3Group v3 auth MD5 <password1> priv DES
[Code]....
I have set the logging level on the 2900 router to informational and see no errors of any kind popping up when I try to scan the router from SpiceWorks. Spiceworks just returns a generic "unable to contact host" message.
I am in search of a 1 Gig Ethernet WAN module for 2900, 3900 series router.I want to terminate 230mbps link on this module.I found EHWIC-1GE-SFP-CU option but as per service provider it will not support to 230mbps link.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 2921 router running c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M4.bin.Its licensed for ipbase, ipbasek9, Permanent and uc,uck9,Permanent (I'm using the router as a voice gateway),I'm looking to update the IOS to c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M5.bin as I'm told it has a fix for some DSP problems.So the question is, do I need to obtain a new license key to apply this update or am I covered by the existing license on the router.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a requirement where 3 Branch locations of an organization is connected to their hub location via MPLS.They have an internet connection only at HUB as shown in the diagram (Attached)Now all spoke locations should access internet via hub.At spoke locations is there a way that I can have Cisco 2900 router and dedicate only 30% of the WAN bandwidth for internet browsing traffic.Remaining 70% should be used for accessing applications at hub.
For example if i have 5 Mbps Mpls port at spoke I want to dedicate only 1 Mbps for internet browsing traffic remaining should be dedicated for accessing the application at hub.How can we acheive this? Can it be done by using PBR and rate limiting?
I have a Cisco router 2900 with firewall, i need to know how can i allow the ping from self zone to outside zone, i trried to create policy from self to outside but i still didn't allow ping or tracert, i get that message when i try to ping from cisco router: "Unrecognized host or address, or protocol not running"
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a brand new 2901 and I'm trying to work out what licence features I have. The output of show licence shows I have ipbasek9 feature and datak9 as EvalRightToUse feature. Is BGP included in the base feature? What will happen when the datak9 evaluation period expires?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI wanted to get some opinions on the topic above. We are purchasing MPLS services from a large ISP and they offer a managed router option. I will also have a Cisco ISR 2900 at each site running SRST for my voice system. I have some experience with BGP and am not scared at all to support it if need be. That said, I am currently looking at pros and cons of going with a managed router from this company vs managing my own. Actually, I will manage my own regardless and would just plug it into the managed router. My router is perfectly capable of handling the BGP protocol but I am hoping that I can get some opinions from all of you.
View 6 Replies View Relatedhow to configure a router 2900 to support connection from 2 firewall ( Active Standby connections) How can i said the router to send the traffic to the stand by when it go down the active Firewall?I was planning to use a Switch ( layer 2 capacity only) in the middle of the equipments ( between the firewalls and the router) in order to send always the traffic for 1 physical interface from the router side , and manage to route all the internatl traffic to the virtual IP of both Firewalls.Also i dont know yet how to configure a VPN site to site if i have that scheme and some Publics NAT ( Firewall - Switch - Router ), i was planning to configure a NAT in the Router in order to allow the VPN traffic to internal IP of the Firewall but still dont know if it will work.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have the below configurations done on a 2900 router. [code]I would like to know, if the IP address assigned to dialer1 interface "20.1.2.133" would be listed in "show arp" ?, as it failed to list on our router and I want to know if this is an expected behavior ?
Secondly, does self ping 20.1.2.133 (dialer interface IP) work ? [code]
When i enter configuration mode for ATM any DSL commands are not recognized. Believe i have the right IOS.
.ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M15, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin"Last reload type: Normal Reloadversion 15.1service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname Router!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!no aaa new-model!
[Code] .......
I've been looking around Cisco's website but I can't find an answer to this -- If the 2900 platform suppots WCCP redirection using GRE?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently copied a configuration from a router 2800 to a 2900. After a power outage no one can connect outside of the network through the new router. Before the outage all was fine. I put back the old router and all is fine which eliminates any cable or switch error. I have the router totally disconnect. I notice the configuration is in place. My question is there any diagnostics that I can run to see if there is any hardware failure. It seems to boot up fine.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a small network that i want to setup, i have 1 2900 router and i'd like to create subinterfaces for the internal. but more importantly i'd like to have the dsl modems connected to the router with traffic from one subinterface going through one modem and traffic from the other going through the other.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe router 1841 is connected directly to the layer switch. the network diagram is below:
Office A --> Switch (L3) --> Router 1841 --> Internet --> Office B
However, when I transfer the file from Office A to office B, the speed very slow ( only around 40 kb/second), and there are an input error and CRC error:
Cisco-R1841#sh interfaces FA0/1
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Gt96k FE, address is 0019.e02f.03dd (bia 0019.e02f.03dd)
[Code]......
I'm looking to configure a DMVPN spoke with a Site to Site VPN Connection to a different destination than the DMVPN. I'm using a Cisco 2800 router. When I add the crytpo map to the outside interface for the Site to Site VPN. The DMVPN drops. Is there something I could be missing? The Tunnel interface for the DMVPN has the shared optioin applied to the tunnel protect ipsec profile.
View 6 Replies View Relatedneed to know the OSPF best design. I have a customer currently running their OSPF only in two area. Area 0 is provider reside and area 1 reside 700 hundred over of router including HQ router and remote branch router connecting to metro-E 10Mbps networks. Is this design have any weakness? Area 1 about 800 hundred router reside in, the HQ model is cisco router 7200 and remote end is cisco router 1841.Let's say they want a solution, for 3G remote router connect back to the HQ using Lease line with a fixed IP. Using DMVPN and OSPF communicating back to HQ. What should we aware when designing and implementing for the OSPF best practice. They have 700 hundred over remote branch need to terminate back to their HQ. I read cisco recommend an area should not be more than 50 router and per-area no more than 28 area.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHaving internet trouble where my connection keeps dropping randomly every minute or so. Tracked it down to my router. Checked my router log and found this: Quote:
Oct 10 07:31:43 syslog: ERRO: MC-Router API already in use; Errno(125): Address already in use
Oct 10 07:31:43 dhcp client: bound IP : 67.240.122.xxx from 67.240.96.1
Oct 10 07:32:16 dhcp client: deconfig: lease is lost
Oct 10 07:32:17 dhcp client: bound IP : 67.240.122.xxx from 67.240.96.1[code]....
I have a ASA 5510 behind a 2911 router. I've trying to configure a remote access and site to site vpn tunnel. I've started on the remote access, and I have it setup, but I'm getting this error message with trying to authenicate from the VPN client (412 error)?
Nov 11 09:52:45 [IKEv1]: IP = 68.51.100.192, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + KE (4) + NONCE (10) + ID (5) + HASH (8) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NAT-D (130) + NAT-D (130) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 428
Nov 11 09:52:51 [IKEv1]: Group = tfx-tg, IP = 68.51.100.192, Duplicate Phase 1 packet detected. Retransmitting last packet.
[code]....