tell me when is available for order the High Availability for AIR-CT2504, like:
AIR-CT7510-HA-K9 Cisco 7500 Series High Availability Wireless Controller
AIR-CT5508-HA-K9 Cisco 5508 Series Wireless Controller for High Availability
I have AIR-CT2504-5-K9, with 5 access point license support. I buy capacity adder license LIC-CT2504-5A for add 5 access points more. When i try download licence file from tftp server on WLC system i see message "License 1 Failed 1" on WLC. TFTP server message downloading OK.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi have AIR-CT2504-5-K9, with 5 access point license support. I buy capacity adder license LIC-CT2504-5A for add 5 access points more. When i try download licence file from tftp server on WLC system i see message "License 1 Failed 1" on WLC. TFTP server message downloading OK.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI cannot for the life of me get the license file to upload. I purchased 25 more licenses. Download and install tftp and put the license file in C:Program FilesTftpd64 But no matter what path I put in Mangagment>Software Activation>Commands, it fails.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a question about my ACS redundancy deployment. I bought three ACS all of them came with base license. but i bought large deployment license my question is necesary to buy the large deployment license to add two seconday ACS to my Primary ACS ? now if I install the large deployment in my primary ACS it replique to other ACS or I have to install first the large deployment one by one (secondary ACS) before to join to the Primary ACS.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a WLC 2504 with 5 AP licenses for which I have installed an adder license via GUI. The installation completed successfully, but I still cannot view the new license. The maximum number of APs is still showing as 5 and in fact I cannot add more that 5 APs. I tried installing the license file again, but now I get a "duplicate" error.
View 4 Replies View Relatedrececntly we have installed 2504 WLC in of branch office, I can able to log via console but it is not coming over LAN not even showing in CDP, all config seems to be fine in wired side & WLC side & physical connection also fine...LED also green.I am seeing log message in WLC, is this related to License issue
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have wlc AIR-CT2504-K9. After save config and power down, wlc cannot start. In console I see:
WLCNG Boot Loader Version 1.0.16 (Built on Feb 28 2011 at 13:14:54 by cisco)
Board Revision 0.0 (SN: PSZ163201YR, Type: AIR-CT2504-K9) (P)
Verifying boot loader integrity... OK.
OCTEON CN5230C-SCP pass 2.0, Core clock: 750 MHz, DDR clock: 330 MHz (660 Mhz da ta rate)
CPU Cores: 4
[Code].....
I have 8 2504 controllers and each needs to have a minimum of 20 MAC addresses added. I would rather not add them one at a time but I don't see any features that allow for an import. Any way to do the import?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have 1 WLC + 17 AP's on our main site and thats working fine... we just buyed a new AP for a new site of us. Its the same domain, same ip range nothing special at all... Somehow the AP on the site keeps rebooting and the users getting nervous of it there
Specs:
WLC: AIR-CT2504-K9
Software Version: 7.2.110.0
AP:AIR-LAP1042N-E-K9
Software version: 7.2.110.0
[code]....
AIR-CT2504-25-K9 will support AIR LAP1142N-E-K9
View 3 Replies View RelatedI configured a 2504 controller with two LWAPP Access Points, and I'm using two SSID's on the same controller, the problem is when the user tries to switch between SSID's he gets an error message saying that the other network is unavailable but if he disconnects from the first network and then connects to the other it works fine !.
View 5 Replies View Relatedsome computers is connecting to AP that is farthest, But there are two APS closer and the signal gets too low, the computer only connects to the closest AP if I disconnect and reconnect.I have 2 controllers series 2500 model AIR-CT2504-K9.
View 5 Replies View RelatedOn the WLC I've set DHCP address pool, everything seems fine after ap download image -> reboot -> hit "Enter" to start blar blar blar... however, after a few second the WLC will initial upgrade image again and again. it's like a non-stop process.
Attached is the start up message, as you can see, i captured it after the ap successfully boot up, and WLC initial another cycle of image upgrade.
btw, my network is flat, WLC & AP all in the same network.
*Nov 3 06:28:30.788: %CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state to JOIN
examining image...!
extracting info (292 bytes)
[Code].....
I have bought 2504 LAN Controller and my old 1142 wants to configure to accept that Controller instead of old controller. These APs and controllers in far away site and before I go there I want to figure out how can I do following.
1. How can I configure old 1142(Previously connected with another LAN Controller) to accept New 2504 Controller instead of old controller ?
2. What are the concerns do I need to consider?
City A is the data center with 2 WLC (CT2504-K9) and a number of AP. City B is a branch with MPLS between A and B. Right now the APs at City B has joined the controller. Users at B is getting ip's assigned from DHCP at City A. How do I configure the WLC so users can get ip's assigned from DHCP server present at B. Option 43 is enabled.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've just been tasked with setting up 19 AIR-CT2504 WLCs with AIR-CAP3502E APs. The primary objective is to maximize throughput from clients uploading LARGE files over the air.
I need to make sure I config HT 802.11n properly with no support for legacy clients in the 5Ghz band.
I have inherited a site where the builders have installed a 2504 controller with 8 access points. Unfortunately they have not created an ap-manager interface when they did the set up. Is there any way I can do this via GUI or command line without going back to defaults?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am using two AIR-CT2504-K9 controllers
Product Version.................................. 7.4.100.0
Bootloader Version............................... 1.0.16
Field Recovery Image Version..................... 1.0.0
Firmware Version................................. PIC 16.0
and 20 access points AIR-CAP2602I-E-K9 Cisco IOS Software, C2600 Software Version 15.2(2)JA, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) LWAPP image version 7.4.100.0
I created 3 SSID:
1. [WPA2][Auth(PSK)]
2. Web-Passthrough
3. [WPA2][Auth(PSK)]
Configuration on controllers is identical. High Availability is configured on all APs. First controller controls only those APs witch have SSIDs with [WPA2][Auth(PSK)], second controller is basically for APs with Web-Passthrough SSID. From the start I have problem, some clients who try to connect to SSID with PSK are dropped or can’t connect entirely, but when they go to the next AP they connect successfully. For example I have Android smartphone and Lenovo laptop, smartphone connects successfully but laptop fails connection to the same AP, but when I take it to other AP it connects successfully. Sometimes smartphones can’t connect too. When devise can’t connect to one SSID it can’t connect to other SSID either. Sometimes there are up to 20 clients tying to connect to the same AP.
When I look into logs, I get these two messages:
Jun 3 08:58:58 192.168.224.1 WLC1: *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 03 08:58:51.176: #DOT1X-4-MAX_EAPOL_KEY_RETRANS: 1x_ptsm.c:456 Max EAPOL-key M1 retransmissions exceeded for client 7c:e9:d3:f4:74:4d
[Code].....
I've got a new CT2504 controller with software version 7.0.220.0 Regarding to [URL]I've tried to configure the internal DHCP on a dynamic-interface, but this is not possible:(Cisco Controller) >config interface dhcp dynamic-interface vlan401 primary 172.16.x.3 vlan401 Interface IP can not be used as internal DHCP server IP It works, if I use another IP (aka DHCP server) in the same subnet or in another subnet. It works also for the management interface.
(Cisco Controller) >show interface detailed management
Interface Name................................... management
MAC Address...................................... d0:c2:82:xx:xx:xx
IP Address....................................... 10.2.x.135
IP Netmask....................................... 255.255.255.240
IP Gateway....................................... 10.2.x.129
[code].....
We have just installed our first CT2504.After install I have found a dramatic drop in signal strength compared to the wireless survey result obtained.All of our site surveys include real world testing using an AP, in this case a AP1041N.In doubt I retested a section using an AP1041N in the same location as one of the recently deployed LAP1041N.
In the same location a LAP1041N has between -10 and -20dbi difference in SNR compared to the test AP1041N.For example locations that tested with -60dbi using an AP1041N have little to no coverage using the LAP1041N installed.This applies irrespective of the WLC automatic control over Tx power or manually setting the LAP TX to the highest level.
I have a CT2504 at a customer site which does not load the captive portal page correctly nor will it load via HTTP as opposed to HTTPS.So for starters I did what I do with all my CT2504's (which work fine), I configured my Guest network to authenticate via the default captive portal. I then disabled HTTPS and SSH and enabled HTTP managment followed by rebooting the controller. On boot, logging into the WLC management GUI is automatically presented via HTTP as expected.However when clients access the Guest network they are redirected to the Web Authorisation via HTTPS instead of HTTP?In addtion to the above the captive portal page does not display correctly.The preview via the controller works fine, but the client is presented with a page with broken links to the images i.e. the blue strip at the top and the Cisco logo on the right.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI´m trying to connect them to my WLAN, for throubleshoot I create a new WLAN with WPA2-TKIP and a PSK, the devices didin´t connect to the WLAN.I also change the security to WPA2-AES with TKIP, it didn´t work too.
My best choice was to disable every security configuration in order to began the throubleshooting from zero, but even with no Layer 2 and 3 security, the devices didn´t connect to my Test WLAN.
I´m using a AIR-CT2504-K9 WLC with two AIR-CAP3502I-A-K9 AP, all the PCs and other brand cellphones and tablets work well.
Also I have a SOHO router on the office, and the IPad connect without a problem with that WLAN, but I need them to connect to my Cisco AP.
What's the difference between VPN Plus license and Security Plus license. I have new 5520 shipped with VPN Plus license.Also does it require a seperate license for Anyconnect for Mobile and AnyConnect Essentials.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI’m stuck in some problem with installation of LMS4.0 in customer site.
- we purchase a LMS4.0(CWLMS-4.0-100-K9) but couldn’t install it on Windows server 2008 R2 64bit because those things don’t support each other.
- I need to upgrade the LMS4.0 to LMS4.2 that is supporting Windows server 2008 R2 64bit.
- So, I ordered following items via product update tool (url...) [code]
- In this status, how to install LMS4.2 with license for 100 devices? If I install R-PI12-BASE-K9 first, can i enter a licese for 100 devices for CWLMS-4.0-100-K9 into PI1.2?
We are going to implement high availabilty in 5508 WLC with version of 7.3.101 . We will be using Prime infrastructure 1.2 for monitoring purpose.With Prime, whether we can monitor and manage redundant WLC also or only active WLC?.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to know if i can connect RAP to RAP and maintain redundancy with connection to WLC.
I have one 1552 with the gigabit ethernet connected to the gigabit ethernet to another device that has a point-to-point link with another device where have a ethernet connection with a switch in the same broadcast domain where i have my WLC.
Next to this 1552 i have another 1552 that have the same situation, both with omnidirectional antenna.
I would like to have a Mesh connection with these two 1552 in 5Ghz, because if some point-to-point link is down i need redundancy to the WLC and my network, because i have some clients connected in the 2.4 Ghz in both Access Points.
My questions is in relation to disaster recovery, for wireless. We have our main data center, in the US, with two 5508 controllers. We have a DR location, in Europe, with two 5508 controller. We're upgrading our 5508's to the 7.4 code, so that we can take advantage of the RP port for our controllers. With that said, is there a way to make the US and Europe controllers redundant?
If there's a disaster, in the US, would the AP licensing, and AP's attach to the European controllers? Our AP's are set up with HA. I'm more concerned about the licensing flipping over to the DR controllers. I've tried researching this topic, and can't really find anything on it.
I have 2x WLC 5508 running version 7.2. 1st one is setup and running. My questions is: If I want to setup Active-Passive redundancy, do I need to manually setup the 2nd one exactly as the 1st one and put them in the same group? Or is it a way to copy all of the configs I made on the 1st one over to the 2nd one?
View 4 Replies View RelatedDoes 2500 series wireless controllers support redundancy?
View 1 Replies View RelatedOur organization has multiple controllers at regional sites (one per region) & want to implement redundancy by placing one controller at headquarter's datacentre as a backup in case the site's failed.All our controllers are 5508 with 7.0.116.0 loaded I did a search around and found multiple documentations of how to do it but all related to creating a mobility group?Is it possbile to implement this scenario without creating mobility group ? (As in Cisco docs for software release 7.0 June 2010 - quoted "Centralized and regional controllers do not need to be in the same mobility group" )
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am in process of replacing our 44xx controllers with new 55xx controllers. During the upgrade, I would like to add redundancy to our guest controllers that reside in the DMZ and had a question about regarding the setup.
If I remember correctly, I would place both guest controllers on the same mobilty group, and then add both of the controllers to the foreign controllers. The foreign controllers will form mobility with both anchors, but choose the one with the lowest MAC address as primary. On the foreign controller, if the lowest MAC addressed anchor controller does not respond, it will connect to the second controller. Is that still true? or is there a better way to go about it?
Also, I was wondering, do I need to put different guest network ranges on each of the Anchor controller? or can I use the same exact range on both anchor controller (since if a controller goes down, the clients would be reconnecting to the second controller anyways?)
Any best way to setup redundant Anchor (guest) controllers).
What consequences could i have if i install a WiSM-2 module into a pair of 6500 configured in VSS and another WiSM-2 module into other pair of 6500 configured in VSS for serving a 300 APs??...in this case, do i need to configure mobility groups for guarantee a high availability and also redundancy of controllers?Under the best practices, is much better having the two WiSM-2 modules into a single pair of 6500 configured in VSS??
View 4 Replies View Related