Cisco Routers :: Configure RV042 Dual WLan / Web And DNS Server
Aug 19, 2011I need configuring Cisco RV042 dual wlan and port forwarding for 2 servers web and dns in LAN
View 1 RepliesI need configuring Cisco RV042 dual wlan and port forwarding for 2 servers web and dns in LAN
View 1 RepliesCisco RV042 Dual WAN VPN Router -how to configure dynamic DNS without having to use the pre-programmed DDNS companies that are populated by default if my DDNS company is not listed and you cannot manually enter another company that is not on the list?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI run 2 RV042 V1 for home and office with Gateway to Gateway VPN connection with single WAN connection in use. Everything works like a charm!
I was even able to create VPN connection with 2 WAN connection on one Router and 1 WAN connection on another with Smart link failover and VPN Tunel Backup.
I got problem though when i tried more complex connection diagram. [URL]
So basically I now have 2 ISP connections on each point with Static IPs and I'd like VPN Connection to be alive for ALL 4 options automatically with failovers (smart links) And tunel backups but i'm not sure if that's ever possible with my equipment.
I've been having a lot difficulties to get Cisco RV042 v 3 run on both WLAN ports. I've tryed in Smart Backup Link and Load Balancing .... nothing.What I want to do is:
1 web server in LAN lets say IP 192.168.15.2
1 dns server in LAN lets say IP 192.168.15.4
I want to have the router running as Smart Backup Link in case one of the internet connections fails (I will say that the DNS server handles most of the domain names on the web server so it needs to be publicly available as well, and the main domain name of the web server is managed by independent DNS server somwhere in internet, so it has mechanism that can be use to change the entries let say DNS round robin way).
1. WLAN1 with PPPOE and WLAN2 with static ip by the second provider LAN fasion, ports forwarded to the web and the dns servers - NOT accesible. Router firmware latest version 4.
2. WLAN1 with static ip by the second provider LAN fashion, network normal operating but cannot access the server on port 80.
2 router to connect my phone system to a Sip trunk provider router and to extend my Lan segments so the phone system have internet access.i need it this way because i cant put 2 default gateway in my phone system so the cisco Rv042 is the default gateway of the phone system and i use port fowarding of the UDP ports 5060 to point to the system.and i also use protocol binding of these ports to the Wan 1
Phone system connect to a switchport The sip trunk router connect to the Wan 1 My lan is connected to the Wan 2 Everything is working fine exept this intermittent issue : Each hour or so my sip trunk stop working. to make it start working i need to unplug my Wan 2 connection and wait for 1 minute.
I'm in the process of finding a dual WAN router with VPN support, that allow me to redirect some traffic to one specific WAN port and do load balancing of that specific traffic in case of that WAN failing (this last requirement is preferably but isn't fully needed).
Does the RV042/G could work with that? In that case, does it allow protocol redirect only? What about ip/ports redirecting? Or some kind of packet filtering to redirect to specific WAN ports?
I have my RV042 set up in Dual WAN mode and both WANs are working properly. I would like to configure WAN1 to handle all traffic, unless it fails and then have everything to go to WAN2. Pretty much what Smart Link Backup does, however with that enabled only 1 of the WANs is live at any given time. I'd like both WANs to always be live as I'm going to see the second one as a back-door into the network. Is this possible to do with routing? I tried setting a routing rule to have everything to go WAN1, but when WAN1 goes down, nothing is rounted via WAN2.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have an RV042 (it's old, silver/dark grey plastic front one) w/ firmware 1.3.13.02-tm.
The reason we bought this (long ago) was to balance two WAN connections, one with unlimited data and one capped monthly. It did that once, but for a couple years both connections have been unmetered so it's just been balancing them 50/50. As of today one WAN connection (the new much faster one) is back to being metered but I can't figure out how to configure the RV042 as it once was to prefer sending traffic over the slow, unmetered connection first, and only use the faster metered connection when necessary.
It's been a long time and honestly I only vaguely remember the ability to prioritize a connection based on % of bandwidth used so that all traffic would go over the unlimited connection 1st until it was flooded, and only then fall over to the metered connection. This is totally different than the weighted round robin, or smart link backup.
I found this 3rdparty forum post that supports that vauge memory and suggests this was eliminated between firmware 1.23 and 1.3: [URL] Is it possible to replicate this functionality with the current firmware? if so how? If not, how to do roll back to firmware 1.23?
It sounded like perhaps I could assigned WAN1 a bandwidth of 100000 (even though it's really 1500) and then assign WAN2 a bandwidth of 1 (even though it's really 20000) and the result might be the prioritization I'm looking to achieve... but I feel like I'm stumbling in the dark at the point.
how i can configure the Cisco RV042 to access PPTP VPN Server (Witopia VPn) or other vpn servers.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI tried to configure two RV042 working together. [code] WAN2 of both Router1 and Router2 are unused (unplugged). However, the Host2 can never ping to Host1. So as to Host1. Should I need to configure the protocol binding for all the traffic to the WAN1?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a RV042 VPN Router with the latest firmware v4.2.1.02.This Router is connected to the main site by a VPN Tunnel.
Now, I like to configure some DHCP Option so I can put a IP Phone behind the RV042. The IP Phone should receive a IP by DHCP from the RV042 and of course, the IP of the Call Manager with the Option 150.
I can configure DHCP and it works fine but I can't find where I have or can configure Option 150.
We have a RV082 configured with two ISP Wan connections. We recently implemented a VOIP phone system (SIP) (192.168.1.50) that is being used in appliance mode on our network. We currently have two WAN connections Load Balanced. My goal is to configure all my VOIP traffic to go out through the 1st ISP and the rest of the data through ISP #2. is this possible to achieve using the RV082? We are using a Skype SIP Trunk connection.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've purchased a Linksys RV042 hoping I could connect my two ISP.Both of them are 1/1 Mb, first is DSL second PPPoE connection.The problem is that on system summary page it doesn't show me that second WAN is connected. Even when I trying to manually connect to Internet it doesn't work.
When this connection is in Load balance Mode, internet is very slow, sometimes it's even disconnected.
My question is:How to configure Load Balance properly?I've tried this page:
[URL]...
I have tried replacing a loaner RV082 V2 with an RV042 V3 router with firmware 4.0.4.02. All worked well, including the site to site VPN. However, in spite of the fact that I have ports 443 and 4125 forwarded to the server (192.168.2.10), we are unable to connect via RWW. There is no such problem with the RV082. What is different with the way we configure these V3 routers for port forwarding?
View 2 Replies View RelatedRegion : Singapore
Model : TL-WDR4300
Hardware Version : V1
I need to set up remote access to my HDD connected to my WDR4300, so I can always go online when I am out to retrieve the saved files in the HDD. However I have zero knowledge of network setting of the FTP servers, I can gain access when I am home and connected to the Wireless network, but how to gain access remotely.
i have setup vpn connection (client-gateway) using quick vpn ( default cisco) and third party like thegreenbow. connection is ok (established) but why from outside I can only ping to IP LAN PC , if I ping ip server the result is request time out(failed). I have been trying do this to 3 server ( windows server 2003 as OS).four your information I have made firewall "OFF" on all of those servers. the result is same, failed.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have a static DSL connection and my ISP is giving me 4 static IP's. I have connected my RV042 to the DSL modem and I have now 1 subnet at 192.168.0.0. What I want to create is a WEB server/ Email server, but to sit on a different subnet - 192.168.5.0. For now I have connected the server to the DMZ port, but I am unable to to access it from WAN, only from LAN. How to configure properly the 2 subnets (192.168.0.0 and 192.168.5.0) and how to forward my static address to the server which I which to be on the 192.168.5.0.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to set up an RV042 as a gateway for our home network. I've cloned the MAC address of the cable modem attached to WAN1, and have set up WAN1 to obtain an IP automatically. The System Summary page shows under WAN Status that WAN1 has been assigned an IP address in the right range for Comcast, the provider. The default gateway address looks good, and the DNS server is, in fact, Comcast's main DNS server for this area.
However, when I go to System Management > Diagnostic, the router is unable to resolve basic domain names (e.g., www.cisco.com) or ping addresses outside the LAN. I can ping the router itself successfully. Attempts to access the web through the router fail on domain name look.
RV042 router is giving out the outer certificate instead of server certificate. Outlook anywhere is failing and we are receiving certificate errors for any secure site behind this firewall. I'm not talking about remote management. I'm talking about people trying to access our web site, which is secured, and getting an error because the RV042 is giving its own SSL certificate instead of the Server's certificate. Firmware Version: 1.3.13.02-tm. I don't see any updates for that hardware. I do have it working on an RV042 with the same firmware at a different location. How do we turn that off or keep it from happening? Output from a test site Attempting to resolve the host name xxxx in DNS.The host name resolved successfully. Additional DetailsTesting TCP port 443 on host xxxx to ensure it's listening and open. The port was opened successfully. Testing the SSL certificate to make sure it's valid. The SSL certificate failed one or more certificate validation checks. Test Steps ExRCA is attempting to obtain the SSL certificate from remote server xxxx on port 443. ExRCA successfully obtained the remote SSL certificate. Additional Details Remote Certificate Subject:
SN=California, L=Irvine, C=US, O="Cisco-Linksys, LLC", OU=RV042, CN=68:ef:bd:b8:0f:78, Issuer: SN=California, L=Irvine, C=US, O="Cisco-Linksys, LLC", OU=RV042, CN=68:ef:bd:b8:0f:78.Validating the certificate name. Certificate name validation failed. Tell me more about this issue and how to resolve it Additional Details Host name xxxx doesn't match any name found on the server certificate SN=California, L=Irvine, C=US, O="Cisco-Linksys, LLC", OU=RV042, CN=68:ef:bd:b8:0f:78.
I wish to change ARP table or any else to get a WOL functionnality.
I found how to activate telnet server, but I don't have the right login and password.
We have setup a new internal web server so now we have two internal web server and both or hosting sites on port 80. Currently we have port 80 forwarding to one of the web servers and users are able to hit it from the outside.
Is there any way to configure the RV042 to route web traffic to the correct web server by using the site name or dns? If a user puts in the address{URL}, be routed to one web server but if they put in {URL}, be routed to our second web server. I've checked with our vendors and the both web servers applications need to run on port 80. If we have forwarding setup on the RV042 to forward port 80 to web1 then users can't access web2 from the outside?
Just installed RV042 router. And it's giving out router certificate instead of server certificate so people who are trying to access our secured server are getting errors. I'm not talking about remote management. I'm talking about people trying to access our web site, which is secured, and getting an error because the RV042 is giving its own SSL certificate instead of the Server's certificate. How do we turn that off or keep it from happenning?
The RV042 firm version is v4.0.0.07-tm (Aug 19 2010 19:19:50)
Just installed a RV042 with dual wan connections. Would like to make the WAN 2 (new cable modem as well) the primary connection over WAN1 (DSL), however whenever I switch from WAN1 to WAN2 in Smark Link set up, our email server will not send mail out, even though nothing is blocking the connection.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have configured PPTP Server on RV042, and created 3 accounts. I am able to connect from Windows PC without any problems.
In the router's logging utility, there doesn't appear to be any log entries indicating either successful or failed attempts to connect to PPTP server. The only access logs I see are for access to the router's configuration utility. Is there a way to view PPTP access in the router system log?
I have a RV042 router. The problem that I am having with it is that the DHCP is giving out the wrong Default Gateway and DNS Server. There is no option to change the DHCP server IP on any of the settings pages on the router. I am begining to think that there might not be a way to do it. I see that there is an option for the DNS under the DHCP page but the Public IP that is being handed out is not the one on that page. I also have 2 WAN connections hooked up as well a DSL link and a Cable link (the cable link is the primary one).
The following information is provided in an effort to resolve this issue:
IP of Router 10.0.0.2
IP of DHCP Server (the one that is being handed out):10.0.0.1
IP of DNS (the one that is being handed out): 10.0.0.11
What I want to it be.
IP of Router: 10.0.0.2
IP of DHCP 10.0.0.2
IP of DNS 10.0.0.2
Is there a way to set up a Site-to-site VPN between RV042 & Cisco 2911? I "googled" this and obtained a document, but it is not regarding Cisco 2911: [URL]
Routers are needed to setup it successfully. I have tried on both routers several configuration steps, no success...
i have one machine have 2 Ethernet devices and i need to connect this server to different 2 network with 2 different gateways (192.168.2.x "vpn network" and 192.168.1.x "adsl network" )so if any other one need to connect this ftp server can connected from vpn or adsl
View 1 Replies View RelatedFirst of all i have gateway 2 gateway VPN configuration (both same RV042 with same firmware) + QVNP clients
The first one that i have those lines in my log "Ignoring Vendor ID payload" which doesn't allow clients to be connected from the first time they connect after several retries, or can't connect at all. I've doublechecked ports opened, and 500 is blocked by ISP. Also double checked, tried turning on and of Windows machine firewalls and etc - nothing worked. What would be the solution? should i manage to call my ISP and ask opening the port and it will solve my problem? HTTPS is enabled on router (this one i read in other topic)
The other problem is that one of my routers just stuck and i have manually to turn off, and then to turn on that it would start working as it was. Log files doesn't show anything. Router started to crash after the last Firmware upgrade.
I'm a bit new at this and I wanted to know if this is possible with the RV042 or if there's a better product to use. Our server is at located at location A and locations B and C telnet to the server via a VPN. We're looking at getting another ISP at each location as a backup and abandon older modem backups.
Would I setup a VPN tunnel between (A and B) and (A and C) for each ISP? Also I had a question on local IP addresses and if this would work
location A, ISP 1 -> location B, ISP1
local IP 192.168.1.1 remote IP 192.168.2.1
Public IP aa.aa.aa.aa Public IP bb.bb.bb.bb
[ code]....
I wanted to ask a question about the diagram I have included. We are bringing up 2 MPLS WAN connections and would like some specifics on the best design. We are using BGP to the providers. From there we have big questions. We can run BGP internal and are licensed to do so on the N5K's. The N5Ks are currently using HSRP for inside LAN clients as default gateway. We want to load balance and provide redundant routes using a dynamic approach. Should we use BGP internal utilizing the connections between the routers? Should we use HSRP on the routers? How best to get the routes to the N5K and should we be considering this?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure two 3845 routers to act as dhcp server and dhcp relay. Clients are connected to the router that relays all dhcp requests to the vrf instance which is used to connect it to the router wich is running dhcp server.
Router1
ip vrf dhcp_dns
rd 8:1
int gi0/0
ip vrf forwarding dhcp_dns
ip address 192.168.200.5 255.255.255.248
[code]...
So far I can see dhcp requests coming from the R1 and dhcp server on R2 replies with the dhcp offer but PC is not getting any ip.
Region : Netherlands
Model : TL-WDR4300
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 3.13.23 Build 120820 Rel.73549n
ISP :
I recently purchased an TL-WDR3600. Setup was easy. Both wlan channels work perfectly. All clients can connect to the internet and access my lan connected NAS. I have some wlan devices which needs to be connected sometimes by http: port 80 and also by telnet or ssh. I can connect from a wlan device to a lan device. But NOT from a wlan to wlan or a lan to wlan. I allready diabled WMM and tried some other wlan settings, like disable one channel, changing the channel width etc.
My setup is : ADSL device -->(192.168.1.X dhcp) WAN TL-WDR3600 --> to LAN&WLAN (192.168.0.X dhcp and some LAN connected with static 0.200, 0.210)
Having a problem everytime I try to use load balance on my Rv042 it is slow as a dog and sometimes wont connect at all. if I run in smart backup mode its fine. removed firewall rebooted everything tried numerous configerations upgraded to the latest frimware just about to be convinced
View 2 Replies View Related