I’m testing a 1841 with 2 WIC-1ADSL cards, but the connections are dropping every 30-50mins. If I swap the cars out for HWIC-1ADSL’s then the lines are stable. I’ve had the profiles on the lines dropped the 4mb down and 512k up but I’m still getting the same issue.
I’ve tried a few 1841’s with various IOS’s and different WIC’s but still get the same result.
I just recently (and very expensively) purchased a HWIC-1ADSL for my 1841 router.
Unfortunately, it doesn't display in the configuration - nor any lights appear on it for power/link.
My first guess is I need to upgrade my IOS. The current version on my 1841 is 12.4(17). Which appears to be pretty current.
What is the difference between HWIC-1ADSL-M and HWIC-1ADSL without the "-M"?Can either of the above ADSL cards be used in Cisco 3845 router? We are using HWIC-1ADSL-M in our Cisco 3845 routers everywhere?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have several 877 routers across a few cities and experience infrequent 'drop-out's which are typically characterised by log entries like the example below.
Our biggest problem is that there is a 60-90 second hard-down period rather than just a 1-2 second 'blip' ... and TCP etc. don't cope well with an outage of this duration.
In general the SnR etc. on the links is good and these occurances are quite rare but when they happen it can be very alarming for users and transactions can fail.
configuration (prefereable acheivable at the CPE rather than the DSLAM end) to work:
1. reduce the outage duration... can the interface be instructed to be less sensitive to temporary line noise and just 'suck it up' rather than resynching?
2. improve the stability of the line... perhaps at the cost of a reduced speed?
3. improve logging of the root cause of the interface going 'down'?
%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to down%DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface Vi2 unbound from profile Di1%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to down%LINK-3-UPDOWN:
[Code].....
Here is my current config build for a Cisco 2620 using a Wic-1ADSL to connect to a Qwest ADSL ISP:
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
ip nat inside
no ip mroute-cache
[code]...
For some reason, it won't connect at all. I've changed the callin requirement on the ppp authentication between "callin" to "callout" - even removed the line completely for a no-authentication scenario.The only responses that come back on a repetative nature when doing a debug are:
Vi2 PPP: Authorization NOT required
and
Vi2 PPP: No remote authorization for call-out
We have open a division in the UK and are using DSL as a back up to a T1-E1, so I was going to use a standard DSL Modem but thought the WiC-1ADSL-I-DG would be better. However I can seem to get the card up and running. Here is the interface config and sh int atm.
interface ATM0/1/0
ip address dhcp
ip access-group 102 in
ip inspect SDM_LOW out
[code]....
That's part of the sh int amt.
I have an ASA 5550 appliance that I am upgrading the code on. It is not being used for anything crazy advanced. It is simply an IPSEC tunnel and router. My main concern is stability, so obviously I would not be using a latest release. I want something that's tried and true. I am currently using asa831-k8.bin
View 16 Replies View RelatedI have version A3 hardware with the latest firmware installed. When i use wireless N, after transferring a large file from my PC to my NAS over wireless, the router slows to a crawl once the file is done. The next file i try to transfer moves at about 200-300kB/s as opposed the the previous 8+MB/s. Watching nextflix and gaming is also slow. After i unplug and plug back in the router, everything is fine. It doesn't do it everytime, but does happen often enough to be frustrating.
After experimenting with different wireless N settings, and trust me i've tried like every combination. I set the router to wireless G only, the transfer speeds are about 2-3MB/s but it always has that speed. It's been stable for well over a month now. But i bought an N router, and want faster speeds. What's the warranty period for this router?
I have a Cisco ASA5505 with Frontier ADSL. I broke into their crappy little modem and obtained the settings needed to replace their modem with a 2621 router with a WIC-1ADSL module. I have a static IP from Frontier which is on my ASA5505 and the Dialer interface on the 2621 gets its address from Frontier via DHCP. There are devices behind the ASA which I need access while in the field, IP Cameras, Seed Treater, etc., so I have Anyconnect running on the ASA and can access everything from my laptop, iPhone and iPad from whereever. The issue arises when my laptop is in house and communicating with my parent company and I try to make a cell phone call off the network extender. The call is choppy since there is no QoS and the data is strangling the voice. Since I have control over the 2621, I added another network and NAT it into Frontier without them knowing. I have since placed the network extender on this network as well as a WAP200 that is wide open for my customers when they are in the office. Doesn't fix the problem but...
I have now added Evertek Wireless internet with a static IP also but they use a reservation based on the MAC Address of my interface of the ASA. This plugs directly intot the ASA via ethernet (I would assume their antenna is just a wireless bridge). I set route tracking on the Evertek side and use the Frontier as a backup and all devices on my NAT network still funcion on Frontier DSL and all my nornal data traffic is out Evertek. The issue is that the Evertek Wireless is not very fast or reliable (today in during a snow storm, it could barely keep an internet connection). And I had a problem with Anyconnect using either connection. I got that working. But think that the "ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y dhcp setroute" on the Evertek side messed things up from a routing standpoint when I would connect from the outside on the Frontier side. For testing, I switched the tracking around and now the connection on the Frontier side does not work but that is besides the point.
Frontier is going to try out an ADSL/2 connection next week which brings up another issue; all Frontier connections come into my buidling on a single 4-pair wire so if they go down, all my internet except the Evertek goes down. I have a Raven Slingshot coming for installation shortly that cannot go down; it will provide RTK (sub-inch accuracy GPS) to my customers that have auto-steer and auto-shutoff capabilities in their tractors via cellular data modem. So, while they are planting their crops in the field, if my connection goes down, their tractor will not function.
I also had a Cisco UC320W but it died a few days after it went off warranty so I replaced it with a Dell Server running 3CX IP PBX that supports Cisco SPA525G2 and SPA501G IP Phones. There is a 3CX iPhone app that allows me to receive calls while in the field, it uses a proprietary tunnel that I have open on the ASA. With 4-pair coming into my building, I will be left with a single 1-pair for phones so I am considering a SIP provider instead.
Can/should I move the Evertek ethernet to the third ethernet interface on the 2621 and track the Frontier DSL against the Evertek (backup) on the 2621 side and use the ASA to track the ADSL/2 against the 2621? Should I acquire an 1841 (or some other device that suppports the HWIC) with a ADSL/2 card and use HSRP between the 2621 and 1841? Is that even possible?
I have a WLC 5508 with half a dozen LAPs (AIR-CAP3502I-E-K9).They have been working but sometimes clients detect conectivity problems with the wlan.Here is the message log I can obtain from the controller:
View 1 Replies View Relatedmy old D-link DGL-4300 was rock steady showing 54 Mbps constant speed (link rate) (in Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit Wireless Network Connection Status window). The new E4200 jumps around from 72 Mbps to 114 Mbps to 130 Mbps to 144 Mbps. However, it mainly stays at 72 Mbps. I have seen 150 Mbps briefly but I have never seen 300 Mbps. I have even placed my laptop within 2 -3 ft of the router and have a strong signal (4 bars) but I still have the same link rate issue. I would think that Windows would show 300 Mbps link rate for my connection when it is that close to the router. My laptop is a Toshiba with an integrated Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN wireless adapter. My son also has a Toshiba laptop with the same wireless adapter but he gets lower speeds than mine due to the fact that he is 50' away in another room in the house. His connection also jumps around but it is at lower link rates than mine.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a client family who will be moving into a big one floor (but on a giant slope hill as if it had two floors) house. About 88 feet seems to be the longest distance from a small room with the new cable modem. This is based on Google Maps' aerial shot: [URL] Longest Distance FromACableModemRoom.jpg (right side/east is a huge hill with trees).Will an old wireless Linksys WRT54GL router be able to handle this far distance with fast speeds and stability? If not, then which wireless routers can do it? It would be nice to have third party firmware options like Linksys WRT54GL routers. Also, fast speed like gigabits for fast local file transfers between computers in the big house! 100mb/sec is slow these days! Stability and support are important too. The routers doesn't need to be the latest too
View 9 Replies View RelatedI used to have a 877w in the same place and same setup as my current 887, this time though the DMT Bits Per Bin just will not populate on ADSL2+ altough it did work when it sync ADSL1 (same line/DSLAM, just came up ADSL for some reason).
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe have a customer in the UK, who is starting to deploy ADSL2+ circuits for the new sites they are adding to their BT IPClear MPLS network.We want to standardise with a config for each site, but to date have found that we seem to be using a different config for each site. Some are configured using a dialer interface & some using a virtual template.
Why on some of the sites the virtual template method works & on others we have to configure a dialer interface. Also in regards to the speeds, what should we configure as bandwidth statements & also for traffic shaping. I know that the ADSL2+ circuits can operate at various speeds, but am i right in thinking these higher speeds are the clock rate of the line & with the BT IPClear product, the customer only gets the agreed/paid for bandwidth.
As this figure is different in both directions, when the traffic shaping is configured using vbr-rt command, is the amount entered based on the slower upstream bandwidth on the circuit.
I have a Cisco 877 ADSL2 route rconfigured which isnt working. I think it may be the Telco at fault,I receive the following in a debug ppp negotiation
*Mar 1 01:08:23.300: Vi3 LCP: I CONFREQ [Listen] id 5 len 15
*Mar 1 01:08:23.300: Vi3 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)
*Mar 1 01:08:23.300: Vi3 LCP: MagicNumber 0x7498F253 (0x05067498F253)
*Mar 1 01:08:23.300: Vi3 PPP: Authorization required
[code]....
The relevant ATM and Dialer configs are -
interface ATM0
description AAPT ADSL Line
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
[code]...
I just bought myself a Cisco 877W in hope that I could touch up on my IOS skills. The configuration went well, however I have found that after configuring the Dot11Radio0 interface, the ADSL2+ has slowed down dramatically. I am still syncing at a decent speed (decent enough for how far I live from the exchange), but web browsing and other internet traffic is horrible. Originally, I was downloading at ~500kb/s, but now I can't even navigate to a website to perform testing. :
I have another ADSL2+ modem which works just fine (using it right now to write this post)
I originally thought this may have been a DNS issue. However, performing an nslookup on various sites from both the router itself and a client PC shows that resolution occurs in only a few seconds. With that said, there are some sites which will load in an instant (Google.com, for example) while others will simply refuse to load. DNS server (Server 2k8) is on the LAN with forwarders to ISP DNS addresses.
cofigure a ADSL2+ Conexion in an 1941 router.line protocol are up but didn't have ip adresse in my interface.[code] i don't know how i can find the probleme, and debug's comandes no show me anything.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI plan on moving to a new internet service provider within a few weeks time, and I have a question.I'm going with TekSavvy, and they have a DSL plan which is quite worth it, and I'm in need of a modem when I make the switch. I think I made up my mind on which modem I want, but I just need to know.. can I use ADSL2+ on the DSL service I am going to get?If you need to know what modem I'm going for, I'm going with "TP-LINK TD-W8960N, 300Mbps Wireless N ADSL2+ Modem Router"
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure an 887VA for a pppoe ADSL2+ connection with no luck.I know the ISP requires pppoe (LLC), and the pvc is 8/35.
The CD light is on, and the line is up, but the 887 just won't connect
I am new to the Cisco routers but am trying to get a Cisco 887va working on a Eircom ADSL2 connection.
I was using the config of an old Cisco router as a guide, basically this has encapsulation aal5snap under the ATM interface, I am unable to set this in the 887va, I did read that this needs to be set under the VDSL controller however it will not take the commands. Also how can I set the the dsl operating-mode to auto.
Here is my config
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1958 bytes!! Last configuration change at 13:20:03 UTC Tue Jul 17 2012version 15.1no service [code]...
I need to look at options for terminating multple ADSL2+ circuits in the UK.Is it worth investing in a router to terminate multiple connections? Or do you think I could just use multiple 877 routers connecting to a good core multilayer switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI currently have a Router that is ADSL2 & VPN capable. It currently allows me to work from home and connect to work servers securely. I have used traceroute [URL] in CMD to determine that all web requests/traffic goes through the VPN server rather than just the requests to access files on the VPN server.I don't feel comfortable having all my traffic now go through work servers(the VPN) so I would like to avoid this. I know I have 2 solutions:- Use Split Tunelling on the router where only requests to files on the VPN server will go through the VPN server, all other traffic is not through the VPN. I have heard that this can compromise the whole network as one node is currently 'unsecured' and can affect/compromise the whole network. Is this true?
- Add a second Router that doesn't connect through the VPN. When I finish work I disconnect from the VPN Routers wireless connection and connect through the second routers wireless connection. I would like to take solution 2 because I wont be compromising the whole network but I have some questions:- Is this something you would recommend?
- Is it dangerous? Is it just as compromising as solution 1?
- In Australia we use physical Phone Splitters for our internet physical connection. One side of the splitter connects to a phone line port on the wall. The other side has 2 ports, one for the phone line connection and one for the router/adsl connection. If I have 2 routers I'll need a splitter that has more than 2 ports so I can connect the 2nd router to the internet. Are there Phone Splitters with more than 2 ports and do ISP's allow me to do this?
We have both ADSL2+ and Cable broadband and wish to have them both connected to and accessible on the same network, possibly linked by using the WiFi modem-routers or by adding redundant WiFi modem-routers in bridge mode.The object is to have a seamless each-way fall-back as both broadband feeds have been unreliable in the past, sometimes for weeks at a time and this has had a destructive influence on concurrent college, uni courses and various pocket-money commercial interests.The current situation is to have two separate wired networks running at 100/1000 with limited WiFi access for laptops and mobile device access.All clients would effectively be part of the same workgroup but with a possible future dmz to a small dynamic dns server for non-business convenience and test use. (HTML, PHP, MySQL website development exercises etc.)At present, there are no significant internal security issues within the firewalls provided by the existing modem-routers and there is no significant budget.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI had a Airtel connection with me for which i was provided Beetel 450 BXI ADSL2 + Router to connect to net using wi-fi on my laptop.How ever now i have changed my isp to ortel cable net providers.i access net on my laptop using lan cable connected from cable modem to my laptophow to configure Beetel 450 BXI ADSL2 + Router so that i connect my cable modem to Beetel 450 BXI ADSL2 + Router and access net wi-fi on my laptop. my os is vista.
View 1 Replies View RelatedRegion : Australia
Model : TD-W8970
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version :
ISP :
Im having issues setting up port forwarding with my Synology NAS.
My house is all connected via network cable, going to a main 24-port switch, which is connected to a Modem/Router (TP-LINK in this case). I can access the NAS from anywhere on my home network, send and receive is fine. I previously used a Billion modem/router in the same config and it all worked fine.
The problem is that when going through the Synology setup, it fails to see the tp-link. So therefore I cannot run its port forwarding program to setup all my ports. Which in turn the NAS can't access the internet. I have started going through the port-forward setting on the router interface, and manually entered the ports - i realized that I'm limited to the number of ports i'm allowed to open! I have also run a port testing program, some are successfully opened the others are not.
Is there some button i need to check or switch on the modem?
i have problem connecting Cisco 867VAE this is my config and my diagnostic file ( IOS version ==> c860vae-ipbasek9-mz.151-4.M4.bin )
diag file :
sBelfort#sh atm int atm0
Interface ATM0:
AAL enabled: AAL5,, Maximum VCs: 2, Current VCCs: 0
VCIs per VPI: 1024,
Max. Datagram Size: 2096
PLIM Type: ADSL - 4608Kbps Upstream, DMT, TX clocking: LINE
[code].....
When i enter configuration mode for ATM any DSL commands are not recognized. Believe i have the right IOS.
.ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M15, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin"Last reload type: Normal Reloadversion 15.1service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname Router!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!no aaa new-model!
[Code] .......
I'm looking to increase my internet speeds as much as possible and was wondering how much my central splitter affects internet speeds? I have an ADSL splitter at the moment, im going to link 3 photos which shows the splitter and how it is wired. Also if you look at the black phone line which connects my house you can see that only two wires are being used (blue and white)? Is this the right setup for ADSL2 or should all 4 wires be connected to the splitter? Im getting only about 500kb/s download and 40kb/s upload max right
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a Netgear N150 Adsl router with Orange and the internet light is constantly red and i have no internet connection i can connect to the router but have no ip address.
View 1 Replies View RelatedRegion : Italy
Model : TD-W8970
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : TD-W8970_V1_130201
I just bought online a brand new TD-W8970 modem/router but I'm in trouble with getting ADSL working.I set up a PPPoE connection with the settings from my ISP but the ADSL Led on the device is solid OFF and in the Admin section it says DSL Status: Not Connected.
[code]...
Region : UnitedKingdom
Model : TD-W8970
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version :
ISP : Virgin
I've just replaced my aging ZyXel Wireless Router with a TD-W8970 which connects to the internet with no problems whatsoever. However, I have an ethernet connected Western Digital MyBookLive NAS which is happily allocated an IP addess but does not show up on my network on my PC (Windows Vista - fully patched). A usb connected pen drive and exactly the same. Am I missing something blindingly obvious? On the ZyXel the NAS worked with no problems whatsoever.
The problem with the NAS was my internet security Bitdefender. For some reason, on installing the TP-W8970, it switched my firewall status to public from home/office. Corrected that and the NAS can now be seen over the network. This does not fix the USB attached pen drive not being seen problem though.
Region : India
Model : TD-W8968
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version :
ISP :
According to inSSIDer the router seems to be using two wifi channels (10+6) and inSSIDer is recommending to move to a standard channel (1,6,11).
Region : UnitedKingdom
Model : TD-W8960N
Hardware Version : V3
Firmware Version : 1.4.0 Build 111130 Rel.55990n
ISP : BT Broadband
Just got myself a new Modem/Router (TD-W8960N), and it wasn't until I had it all up and running that I realised it didn't have USB port on the back.Anyways, I was wondering how I could go about fixing this? I stumbled upon this (TP-Link TD-8817) on Amazon and wasn't sure if I could attach this to it in bridged mode or something. This has the USB socket I need. If this was all I needed, how do they connect together? I have a BT connection btw.Also, I have a Justop Android 4.0 TV Box (media player). Would this be able to see the HDD for streaming movies.