I set up RME several years ago on our Ciscoworks several running LMS 3.2 to notify us on any BGP flaps via email notification.I noticed the last couple maintenance period where we had perform Circuit work with our ISP's. We haven't received any emails....I verified those routers are configured to send notifications in the Device Selector and even checked the router logs.
004161: Nov 20 05:04:52 EST: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor X.X.X.X Down BGP Notification sent
004162: Nov 20 05:04:52 EST: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor X.X.X.X 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
The syslog collector status appears to be normal.....
I'm using CiscoWorks LMS 4.0.1 and I need to activate a remote syslog collector.Installation occur without errors and the test subscription is fine but syslog reports are always empty!These two servers need to communicate through a firewall.I'm not able to define a correct rule, a "permit ip any any" does not work also!
Seems to me that regardless of the command set that once you allow a user into Config mode all bets are off. I want to allows certain users only certain actions (like assinging ports to a different vlan) but once in Config mode none of them matter, and the user has free reign.
1. Is it even possible to restrict which commands a users has under Config mode?
2. If so, is there a specific way withing ACS 5.3 or on the router/switch itself that this needs to be defined?
I am in the process of turning our autonomous wireless network into a centrally managed lwapp network. We have a new 5508 with 1140 series APs which will be distributed in three locations nationwide.
My manager saw a presentation that showed the AP just getting plugged in and all of its configurations were downloaded. Right now I am able to get basic global information to install on an AP in the local network but I feel I am missing something. If I have three locations using different IP schemes (eg: 10.0.1.0 for A, 10.0.2.0 for B and 10.0.3.0 for C), the remote locations are getting their DHCP info from the routers.
Is there a way based on location/IP that the APs associate themselves with the correct WLAN or AP group? How much can I automate once the AP discovers the controller? I am reading the manual and searching the web but information is a bit vauge on this. My plan is if an AP fails in a remote location, all I need to do is ship a new AP out to be replaced and when the AP is added to the network the firmware and other information is downloaded and is then ready to be accessed with minimal configuration on the controller end.
Add the ability to send syslog events to multiple syslog servers in the SA500 Series routers. I know the functionality is currently in the RV220W because we utilized it. It would be great if you could configure the syslog servers by event type as well. For example, being able to send the kernel events to syslog server A, and all other events to syslog server B.
Recently i have upgraded the IOS of ASA5550 (in HA mode) to 8.4.2 from 8.0.5, after OS upgrade we found that the syslog from thses firewalls are not getting captured/transfered to centralised syslog server. The server is reachable from the firewalls.
I am trying to get CiscoWorks LMS 4.0 to connect to my routers in order to back up configurations, but I am getting SSH authentication failures reported in the router logs (and archiving fails).
The credentials LMS is using is a username and password with priviledge 15: the account is established in TACACS+. I can log into the devices directly with this user account.However, I cannot TFTP from the routers to the LMS either (I get a permission denied message in the router).
LMS did manage to fetch some configs, but 90% of my devices are having this issue.
I upgraded the LMS 4.0 with LMS 4.0.1 but now the events are removed of Fault View. The equipments than I am monitoring are: ME-3600, ME-3800 and ASR 9000. This is a configuration problem or I have to update something else?
I am running CiscoWorks LMS 4.0.1 since 6 months and I wanted to generate today a report about the interface utilization on 2 Cisco switches (Catalyst 3750G). The corresponding job is created, it runs and then i get "succeeded with info" in the "Run Status" column. When I want to click then on the "View Report" link, I get the following error: "Could not generate the report. Either data is not available for the specified duration or the report job failed."
I tried the same procedure with 2 other switches but I have got the same result.
A while back we were looking into upgrading our SUN/Oracle server to better service our CiscoWorks. Our vendor (partnered Cisco Vendor) told us that Cisco was developing an appliance like WCS and CNR that runs Redhat for CiscoWorks.Does any one have any info on this or could this be a rumor?
We do not run Windows devices on any of our network enterprise and this would be so cool!
Oracle is getting to be a clone of Windows..in our opinion
If this is true, I will happy to sit and wait for it.
We now run LMS 4.0 on a SUN/Oracle T2000 and it seems to be bottlenecking.
When trying to start CiscoWorks Daemon Manager i get the following message:"The CiscoWorks Daemon Manager service on local computer started and the stoped. Some services stop automatically if they are not in use by other services or programs."I have tring starting the service from DOS also and get,E:Program FilesCSCOpxsetupsupport>net start crmdmgtdThe CiscoWorks Daemon Manager service is starting.The CiscoWorks Daemon Manager service could not be started. The service did not report an error. More help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 3534.
I am trying to use Ciscoworks LMS3.2 with RME 4.3.1. to upgrade many, many Cat3750x stacks we have laying around. The problem I am having is that Ciscoworks downloads the new image to the Stack’s master switch only and not to all switches. When I reload the stack after the download, any switch could become the master. I already set up the priority to always have the same master, but the process is unreliable and more than once I ended up with another switch as a master. In any case if the master is not the switch with the new image, the stack will keep the old image as their running image and the switch with the newer image has problems joining the stack (after a while it downgrades and become stable)I know how to do it manually, but I was hoping Ciscoworks would be able to do this for me. It would make my life much easier.
I upgraded CiscoWorks LMS from 3.0 to 3.2 today. Everything worked prior to the upgrade.The upgrade was successful, with no errors, and all services started. check everything and I see no problem. The system creates the file MDCSupportInformation.zip me clean without any content.I add the installation log file;And tell them that after upgrading to 3.2, you carge the following patches:
I'm trying to get user authentication backed off to ACS 5.1, I've got it working but not the way I'd like. This is using the TACACS settings not ACS mode.I've created a local user in CW and assigned it to the correct roles, then created a user in ACS with the same name and a different password and this works fine.My question is can I set the roles on the TACACS server using a shell profile/custom attributes. All the documentation I can find is for ACS v4?
I'm installing CiscoWorks LMS 4.0 on a server running Windows 2008 R2 Standard Ed, 64 bit. I'm using the patch to run the setup program. Now I'm upgrading to 4.0.1 without using the patch.
i am currently trying to use LMS 3.2 Compliance management to verify and alter our access port configurations for 802.1x. Below is our current configuration
I used the below syntax to check the snmpwalk to an interface of a cisco 7606-s router from an LMS 4.0 version cli.
NMSROOT/Objects/jt/bin>snmpwalk -v 2c -c <snmp-string> <ip-addr> 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6 Timeout no response from <ip_address>
This is the error im getting in cli prompt. But i could see that reports are generating.If i try with the loopback ip address, i get proper snmpwalk outputs.. I have increased the timeout and retry options..
I added this wlc in lms and tried to collect inventory. But it is failing after taking long hours.(LMS Version 3.2.1,WLC 4404 -Version 7.0.116)(SNMP walk is successful & using SNMP V2c)I hope the specific package is available in LMS as i could find the WLC 4404 in Device update->Sys Obj ID -> <id of 4404 WLC> Any bug could be the reson for this...?
I have a Cisco 3945 Router and when we try to add the same into the Cisco Works it gives me an error saying " CM0056 Config fetch failed for 192.168.xx.xx Cause: CM0204 Could not create DeviceContext for 1238 Cause: CM0206 Could not get the config transport implementation for 192.168.xx.xx Cause: UNKNOWN Action: Check if required device packages are available in RME. Action: Check if protocol is supported by device and required device package is installed.
We are using LMS version 2.6. Any info on the latest router 3945 with support or not.
After migrating a virtual machine that hosts the CiscoworksLms 4.0, Daemon Manager service does not start.Following is the error:ERROR! The license file is invalid. Please click this link for information about Obtaining a valid license or purchase click here for current licensing information Otherwise, please contact your Cisco representative for purchasing information.I have already entered in the User casuse group of administrators and reset the password but no use Daemon Manager service not up?
We have LMS3.2,CS3.3 and RME 4.3.1 on solaris 9 and I want to know what were cisco patches installed on the server in order to install other patches without any problem.
I am running with LMS 3.2. I have added all the required devices to the LMS and its working fine and taking the backup of Start-up and running configuration as well as vlan information from the devices. My question is that can i configure LMS to take the Show tech-support of all the devices?
I have a problem with System-defined Link Port Interface Utilization Poller. When I generate Interface Utilization Report, this one just displays few Interfaces (see the figure in my attachment). I checked the default poller for interface utilization and recognize that it just associate with few Interface (same as in Interface Utilization Report) instead all. I need to display the utilization of all interfaces in my report
Is Link Port Interface Utilization wrong or Is it necessary to creat user-defined poller that associate with all interfaces of devices?
